Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, July 22, 2020

COVID-19 Could Spur Stroke Lytic Shift to Tenecteplase

As all we have right now is fucking failures of stroke associations you have absolutely no assurance that this transition will occur and will occur properly because every single hospital has to do this on their own. And with your hospital not following and implementing research you are screwed if you have a stroke right now.  Your doctor shouldn't be guessing on what to do. AN EXACT PROTOCOL SHOULD BE FOLLOWED.  

COVID-19 Could Spur Stroke Lytic Shift to Tenecteplase


by Nicole Lou, Staff Writer, MedPage Today
A senior man in a hospital bed being attended to by a nurse
The COVID-19 pandemic could hasten the switch to tenecteplase (TNKase) from other thrombolytic therapies for stroke treatment, thanks to its workflow advantages and the need to conserve alteplase (Activase) because of its growing use in COVID-19 patients, some specialists argued.
Before the pandemic, some stroke centers had already transitioned to tenecteplase from alteplase, because it is given as a single, 5-second IV bolus that takes about 2 minutes to mix, prepare, and administer rather than the more than 1 hour for weight-based bolus and subsequent infusion of alteplase.
"The simpler tenecteplase workflow may be additionally advantageous during the COVID-19 pandemic," wrote Steven Warach, MD, PhD, of the University of Texas at Austin, and Jeffrey Saver, MD, of UCLA, in a viewpoint article published online in JAMA Neurology.
"Eliminating the alteplase 1-hour infusion and the dedicated second intravenous catheter that it requires reduces staff time in close proximity to the patient and removes the intravenous infusion pump that accompanies the patient through other hospital departments and wards, presenting its own set of surfaces for a virus to settle on and staff to touch," they noted.
Another reason to make the switch: recent findings suggesting that alteplase might help COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. "With COVID-19-associated supply chain disruptions also occurring, some centers and regions in the world temporarily do not have access to alteplase for its ischemic stroke indication," Warach and Saver said.
Tenecteplase is recommended by guidelines as an alternative to alteplase, but is not FDA approved for use in stroke.
As such, the viewpoint authors offered several suggestions for centers making the transition from alteplase to tenecteplase:
  • Hospitals should achieve consensus across key clinical and administrative stakeholder and oversight groups, including early engagement of neurology, emergency medicine, and pharmacy departments.
  • Review the clinical trial evidence and add tenecteplase to the hospital formulary if not already available.
  • Off-label use of tenecteplase can be justified by pointing out that the standard use of alteplase for stroke at 3-4.5 hours is also off-label, but accepted based on expert consensus of the published evidence.
  • To assuage liability concerns, appropriate clinical oversight bodies should document the approval and adoption of tenecteplase as the local standard of care for stroke thrombolysis.
  • Centers should implement tenecteplase at one default dosage (0.25 mg/kg) to avoid confusion during a stroke emergency.
  • Clinicians should be told not to follow the acute MI-based prescribing information in the tenecteplase kit for a stroke patient, because dosage differs.
  • Hospitals should systematically replace alteplase with tenecteplase on their electronic health record ordering and monitoring tools.
  • Keep a clinical registry of tenecteplase stroke cases and participate in national COVID-19 stroke registries.
Overall, many systems are already moving toward tenecteplase for acute stroke, regardless of COVID-19, commented Louise McCullough, MD, PhD, of UTHealth and McGovern Medical School in Houston, who said she agreed with the points made by Warach and Saver.
Tenecteplase is a plasminogen activator with greater fibrin specificity and reduced clearance compared with alteplase, qualities that allow for single-bolus administration. Trials have shown it is noninferior to alteplase in safety and efficacy.
  • author['full_name']
    Nicole Lou is a reporter for MedPage Today, where she covers cardiology news and other developments in medicine. Follow
Disclosures
Warach reported financial compensation from Genentech for chairing the Data Monitoring Committee for the TIMELESS trial of tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke.
Saver disclosed grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim.

No comments:

Post a Comment