So where did you put the protocol for this so all 10 million yearly stroke survivors
now and into the future can find it and bring it to their doctor's attention?
Multimodal ambulatory monitoring of daily activity and health-related symptoms in community-dwelling survivors of stroke: Feasibility, acceptability, and validity.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , Volume 103(10) , Pgs. 1992-2000.
NARIC Accession Number: J90202. What's this?
ISSN: 0003-9993.
Author(s): Lau, Stephen C. L.; Connor, Lisa T.; King, Allison A.; Baum, Carolyn M. .
Publication Year: 2022.
Number of Pages: 9.
Abstract: Study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring, which combines accelerometry with ecological momentary assessment (EMA), to assess daily activity and health-related symptoms among survivors of stroke. Over a 7-day period, 40 stroke survivors completed 8 daily EMA surveys about daily activity and symptoms (mood, cognitive complaints, fatigue, pain) while wearing an accelerometer. Participants also completed retrospective assessments and an acceptability questionnaire. Feasibility was determined using attrition rate and compliance. Acceptability was reported using the acceptability questionnaire. Convergent and discriminant validity were determined by the correlations between ambulatory monitoring and retrospective self-reports. Criterion validity was determined by the concordance between accelerometer-measured and EMA-reported daily activity. All participants completed the study (attrition rate=0 percent). EMA and accelerometer compliance were 93.6 percent and 99.7 percent, respectively. Participants rated their experience with multimodal ambulatory monitoring positively. They were highly satisfied (mean, 4.8 out of 5) and confident (mean, 4.7/5) in using ambulatory monitoring and preferred it over traditional retrospective assessments (mean, 4.7/5). Multimodal ambulatory monitoring estimates correlated with retrospective self-reports of the same and opposing constructs in the predicted directions. More intense accelerometer-measured physical activity was observed when participants reported doing more physically demanding activities and vice versa. Findings support the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring in survivors of mild stroke. Multi-modal ambulatory monitoring has potential to provide a more complete understanding of survivors’ daily activity in the context of everyday life.
Descriptor Terms: CLIENT SATISFACTION, COMPLIANCE, DAILY LIVING, DEVICES, ELECTRONICS, EVALUATION TECHNIQUES, FEASIBILITY STUDIES, MEASUREMENTS, OUTCOMES, PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, REHABILITATION SERVICES, STROKE, TELECOMMUNICATIONS.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Lau, Stephen C. L., Connor, Lisa T., King, Allison A., Baum, Carolyn M. . (2022). Multimodal ambulatory monitoring of daily activity and health-related symptoms in community-dwelling survivors of stroke: Feasibility, acceptability, and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 103(10), Pgs. 1992-2000. Retrieved 12/21/2022, from REHABDATA database.
NARIC Accession Number: J90202. What's this?
ISSN: 0003-9993.
Author(s): Lau, Stephen C. L.; Connor, Lisa T.; King, Allison A.; Baum, Carolyn M. .
Publication Year: 2022.
Number of Pages: 9.
Abstract: Study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring, which combines accelerometry with ecological momentary assessment (EMA), to assess daily activity and health-related symptoms among survivors of stroke. Over a 7-day period, 40 stroke survivors completed 8 daily EMA surveys about daily activity and symptoms (mood, cognitive complaints, fatigue, pain) while wearing an accelerometer. Participants also completed retrospective assessments and an acceptability questionnaire. Feasibility was determined using attrition rate and compliance. Acceptability was reported using the acceptability questionnaire. Convergent and discriminant validity were determined by the correlations between ambulatory monitoring and retrospective self-reports. Criterion validity was determined by the concordance between accelerometer-measured and EMA-reported daily activity. All participants completed the study (attrition rate=0 percent). EMA and accelerometer compliance were 93.6 percent and 99.7 percent, respectively. Participants rated their experience with multimodal ambulatory monitoring positively. They were highly satisfied (mean, 4.8 out of 5) and confident (mean, 4.7/5) in using ambulatory monitoring and preferred it over traditional retrospective assessments (mean, 4.7/5). Multimodal ambulatory monitoring estimates correlated with retrospective self-reports of the same and opposing constructs in the predicted directions. More intense accelerometer-measured physical activity was observed when participants reported doing more physically demanding activities and vice versa. Findings support the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring in survivors of mild stroke. Multi-modal ambulatory monitoring has potential to provide a more complete understanding of survivors’ daily activity in the context of everyday life.
Descriptor Terms: CLIENT SATISFACTION, COMPLIANCE, DAILY LIVING, DEVICES, ELECTRONICS, EVALUATION TECHNIQUES, FEASIBILITY STUDIES, MEASUREMENTS, OUTCOMES, PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, REHABILITATION SERVICES, STROKE, TELECOMMUNICATIONS.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Lau, Stephen C. L., Connor, Lisa T., King, Allison A., Baum, Carolyn M. . (2022). Multimodal ambulatory monitoring of daily activity and health-related symptoms in community-dwelling survivors of stroke: Feasibility, acceptability, and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 103(10), Pgs. 1992-2000. Retrieved 12/21/2022, from REHABDATA database.
No comments:
Post a Comment