Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, December 15, 2022

Healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review

The real barrier is that they are just guidelines, the researchers didn't do their jobs properly and hand over fully complete protocols.  With protocols you'll know they work and survivors will gladly do the reps necessary to recover. Do you blithering idiots ever think at all?

 Healthcare professionalsperceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation:
A systematic review

Healthcare professionalsperceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice
guidelines for stroke rehabilitation:
A systematic review
Adrienne Cormican 1 , Shashivadan P Hirani2 ,
and Eamonn McKeown

Abstract

Objective:  
To identify healthcare professionals perceived barriers and facilitators to clinical practice
guideline implementation within stroke rehabilitation.
Data sources: CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, Cochrane library, Academic Search Complete and
Scopus.  
Additional papers were identified through hand searching.
Review methods: 
 The review followed the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-
Analysis Protocols systematic review approach. Any empirical research that provided qualitative data on
healthcare professionals perceived factors influencing clinical guideline implementation in stroke rehabili-
tation was included. One reviewer screened all titles and abstract reviews (n = 669). Another two
reviewers independently screened 30% of title and abstract reviews, followed by full-text reviews (n = 61).
Study quality was assessed using the mixed-method appraisal tool.
Results:  
Data from 10 qualitative, six quantitative and six mixed-method studies published between
2000 and 2022, involving 1576 participants in total, were analysed and synthesised using modified thematic synthesis approach. The majority of participants were therapists n = 1297 (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists). Organisational factors (time constraints,
resources) alongside healthcare professionals lack of knowledge and skills were the most cited barriers to guideline implementation. Contradictory attitudes and beliefs towards stroke guidelines applicability to real-life clinical practice and their evidence base were reported. Organisational support in the form of training, local protocols, performance monitoring and leadership were reported as perceived facilitators.
Conclusion:  
Barriers and facilitators are multifactorial and were identified at guideline, individual, team and organisational levels. There is a need to translate perceived barriers and facilitators into implementation interventions especially addressing organisational level barriers.

No comments:

Post a Comment