Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation

 

Absolutely useless! 'Measurements' DO NOTHING UNLESS THEY ARE DIRECTLY MAPPED TO RECOVERY PROTOCOLS! I'd have you all fired! This proves the absolute fucking stupidity of the stroke medical world!

Send me hate mail on this: oc1dean@gmail.com. I'll print your complete statement with your name and my response in my blog. Or are you afraid to engage with my stroke-addled mind? No excuses are allowed! You're medically trained; it should be simple to precisely state EXACTLY WHAT GOOD 'measurements' do to get survivors recovered with NO EXCUSES! Your definition of competence in stroke is obviously much lower than stroke survivors' definition of your competence! Swearing at me is allowed, I'll return the favor. Don't even attempt to use the excuse that brain research is hard.

Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation

Keh-chung Lin, ScD, OTR;1–2 Li-ling Chuang, PhD, PT;1 Ching-yi Wu, ScD, OTR;3* Yu-wei Hsieh, MS;1Wan-ying Chang, BS41School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei,Taiwan; 3Graduate Institute of Clinical Behavioral Science and Department of Occupational Therapy, Chang Gung
University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; 4Rehabilitation Department, Taipei Hospital, Department of Health, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

In this study, we compared the responsiveness and validity of the Box and Block Test (BBT), the Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). We randomized 59 patients with stroke into one of three rehabilitation treatments for 3 weeks. We administered six outcome measures (BBT, NHPT, ARAT, Fugl-Meyer Assessment [FMA], Motor Activity Log [MAL], and Stroke Impact Scale [SIS]hand function domain) pretreatment and posttreatment. We used the standardized response mean (SRM) to examine responsiveness and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient(rho) to examine concurrent validity. The BBT, NHPT, and ARAT were moderately responsive to change and not significantly different (SRM = 0.64–0.79). The correlations within the BBT, NHPT, and ARAT were moderate to good at pretreatment(rho = –0.55 to –0.80) and posttreatment (rho = –0.57 to –0.71). The BBT and ARAT showed fair to moderate correlations with the FMA, MAL, and SIS hand function domain at pretreatment and posttreatment (rho = 0.31–0.59), whereas the NHPT demonstrated low to fair correlations with the FMA and MAL (rho = –0.16 to –0.33) and moderate correlations with the SIS hand function domain (rho = –0.58 to –0.66). Our results indicate that the BBT, NHPT, and ARAT are suitable to detect changes over time. While simultaneously considering the responsiveness and validity attributes, the BBT and ARAT can be considered more appropriate for evaluating dexterous function than the NHPT. Further studies with larger samples are needed to validate these findings. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; Relative Effects and Predictive Models of Contemporary Upper Limb Training Programs in Stroke Patients; NCT00778453; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00778453?term=NCT00778453&rank=1. Key words: bootstrapping, cerebrovascular accident, clinimetrics, dexterity, function, outcome, rehabilitation, responsiveness, upper limb, validity. Abbreviations: ADL = activity of daily living, AOU = amountof use, ARAT = Action Research Arm Test, BAT = bilateral arm training, BBT = Box and Block Test, CIT = constraint-induced therapy, dCIT = distributed CIT, FMA = Fugl-Meyer Assessment, MAL = Motor Activity Log, NHPT = Nine-Hole Peg Test, SIS = Stroke Impact Scale, SRM = standardized response mean, UL = upper limb, WMFT = Wolf Motor Function Test.* Address all correspondence to Ching-yi Wu, ScD, OTR; Department of Occupational Therapy, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-Hwa 1st Road, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan 333,Taiwan; 886-3-2118800, ext 5761; fax: 866-3-2118800, ext3163. Email: cywu@mail.cgu.edu.tw DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2009.09.0155

No comments:

Post a Comment