You still don't know that the NIHSS subjective stroke scale is worthless? Until you get an objective damage diagnosis you can never map rehab protocols to them to see what protocols wok.
Inconsistent classification of mild stroke and implications on health services delivery
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , Volume 101(7) , Pgs. 1243-1259.
NARIC Accession Number: J84556. What's this?
ISSN: 0003-9993.
Author(s): Roberts, Pamela S. ; Krishnan, Shilpa ; Burns, Suzanne P. ; Ouellette, Debra Pappadis, Monique R..
Project Number: 90SFGE0002, 90DP0028 (formerly H133A120020).
Publication Year: 2020.
Number of Pages: 17.
NARIC Accession Number: J84556. What's this?
ISSN: 0003-9993.
Author(s): Roberts, Pamela S. ; Krishnan, Shilpa ; Burns, Suzanne P. ; Ouellette, Debra Pappadis, Monique R..
Project Number: 90SFGE0002, 90DP0028 (formerly H133A120020).
Publication Year: 2020.
Number of Pages: 17.
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review on
classifications of mild stroke based on stroke severity assessments
and/or clinical signs and symptoms. Electronic searches of PubMed,
PsycINFO (Ovid), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health
(CINAHL–EBSCO) databases included keyword combinations of mild stroke,
minor stroke, mini stroke, mild cerebrovascular, minor cerebrovascular,
and transient ischemic attack. Five reviewers independently screened
titles and abstracts for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers
independently screened each full-text article for eligibility. The 5
reviewers checked the quality of the included full-text articles for
accuracy. Data were extracted by 2 reviewers and verified by a third
reviewer. Sixty-two studies were included in the final review. Ten
unique definitions of mild stroke using stroke severity assessments were
discovered, and 10 different cutoff points were used. The National
Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was the most widely used measure to
classify stroke severity. Synthesis also revealed variations in
classification of mild stroke across publication years, time since
stroke, settings, and medical factors including imaging, medical
indicators, and clinical signs and symptoms. Inconsistencies in the
classification of mild stroke are evident with varying use of stroke
severity assessments, measurement cutoff scores, imaging tools, and
clinical or functional outcomes. Continued work is necessary to develop a
consensus definition of mild stroke, which directly affects treatment
receipt, referral for services, and health service delivery.
Descriptor Terms: CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS, HEALTH CARE, LITERATURE REVIEWS, SERVICE DELIVERY, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Roberts, Pamela S. , Krishnan, Shilpa , Burns, Suzanne P. , Ouellette, Debra Pappadis, Monique R.. (2020). Inconsistent classification of mild stroke and implications on health services delivery. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 101(7), Pgs. 1243-1259. Retrieved 10/14/2020, from REHABDATA database.
Descriptor Terms: CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS, HEALTH CARE, LITERATURE REVIEWS, SERVICE DELIVERY, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Roberts, Pamela S. , Krishnan, Shilpa , Burns, Suzanne P. , Ouellette, Debra Pappadis, Monique R.. (2020). Inconsistent classification of mild stroke and implications on health services delivery. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 101(7), Pgs. 1243-1259. Retrieved 10/14/2020, from REHABDATA database.
No comments:
Post a Comment