Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, October 16, 2020

Tele-Rehab After Stroke Shows Promising Results

 Better is NOT GOOD ENOUGH. 100% RECOVERY IS THE ONLY GOAL IN STROKE. If that is not your goal as a stroke researcher, get the hell out. We don't need people in stroke that accept the tyranny of low expectations.

Tele-Rehab After Stroke Shows Promising Results

Stroke patients who engage in rehabilitation training at home through live video consultations may recover their motor skills better than those who attend rehabilitation sessions in person at an outpatient facility, results of a new study suggest.

The researchers say that the convenience of undergoing rehabilitation at home may have helped patients stick to their rehabilitation programs.

The Chinese study was published online in Neurology on September 30.

"During the pandemic, when travel and human contact might not be possible, it's important to find out if it's safe and effective for stroke patients to recover at home, using video consultations for their therapy," said study author Chuancheng Ren, PhD, of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

The study involved 52 patients who had had a stroke an average of 14 days previously.

They were randomly assigned to either home-based motor training tele-rehabilitation or conventional rehabilitation at an outpatient facility. There were no significant differences with regard to the demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. Patients were classed as having stroke of mild to moderate severity (mean NIHSS, 5).

Both groups underwent the same intervention, comprising 10 sessions. Each session included occupational therapy, physical therapy, and electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation.

There were two primary outcomes: an impairment-based measure, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment; and an activity-based measure, the modified Barthels Index. Assessments were made immediately post intervention and after 12 weeks of follow-up.

Results showed that both interventions produced a positive effect in both measures at both time points, fulfilling noninferiority criteria for the tele-rehabilitation group.

In fact, the tele-rehabilitation group showed a superior effect at the postintervention measure of the Fugl-Meyer, an improvement of 11.1 points vs 5.3 for the conventional group, a difference that reached significance (P = .01).

In addition, resting state functional MRI showed improved brain connectivity between the bilateral M1 areas in the remote training group compared to the conventional training group.

The researchers found that the number of treatment sessions and the total duration of therapy were higher in the remote training group, which completed an average of 109 hours of physical/occupational therapy compared to 97 hours in the conventional rehab group.

The total amount of electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation was similarly increased in the remote group. However, the researchers say that this alone would not account for the better outcomes.

"The home-based motor training tele-rehabilitation approaches used in the current trial were designed to make the rehabilitation training accessible for stroke patients with movement disorders at home; they also lessen the travel burden," the authors note.

This strategy provided a convenient way for patients to conduct rehabilitation, which improved patient compliance, they state. Moreover, the tele-rehabilitation approach could offer more opportunities for patients to participate and learn from the realistic family and social environment.

"These unintended and individualized exercises, including daily routines and social participation activities, together with the rehabilitation prescription training, may jointly explain the positive role of the tele-rehabilitation approach in motor recovery."

In an accompanying editorial, Susan Hillier, PhD, and Brenton Hordacre, PhD, University of South Australia, note that an increase of at least 10 points in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment is needed to show meaningful improvement, so the functional improvement in the tele-health group is considered clinically relevant.

They describe the resting-state functional connectivity findings as "both reassuring and important," because they engender confidence in the reported behavioral improvements. The MRI findings also imply that resting-state measures have value in stroke recovery, underlining the need to develop further knowledge of this functional brain measure following stroke, they comment.

"We welcome these kinds of trials that help guide our decision-making for service provision and that consider brain level change as well as patient-level," the editorialists conclude.

This study was supported by Shanghai Strategic Emerging Industries Project Plan and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Neurol. Published online September 30, 2020. Abstract, Editorial

 

No comments:

Post a Comment