Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, June 4, 2021

Mechanical Design and Analysis of the End-Effector Finger Rehabilitation Robot (EFRR) for Stroke Patients

They never say if this will be able to provide 100% recovery  in the time you'll be able to use this in the hospital.

Mechanical Design and Analysis of the End-Effector Finger Rehabilitation Robot (EFRR) for Stroke Patients 

 
1 Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System Laboratory of Hebei Province, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
2 Key Laboratory of Advanced Forging & Stamping Technology and Science of Ministry of Education, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China
3 Academy for Engineering & Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
4 State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150080, China
5 College of Arts & Design, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Giovanni Legnani
Machines 2021, 9(6), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines9060110
Received: 26 April 2021 / Revised: 19 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 26 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design and Control of Advanced Mechatronics Systems)

Abstract

Most existing finger rehabilitation robots are structurally complex and cannot be adapted to multiple work conditions, such as clinical and home. In addition, there is a lack of attention to active adduction/abduction (A/A) movement, which prevents stroke patients from opening the joint in time and affects the rehabilitation process. In this paper, an end-effector finger rehabilitation robot (EFRR) with active A/A motion that can be applied to a variety of applications is proposed. First, the natural movement curve of the finger is analyzed, which is the basis of the mechanism design. Based on the working principle of the cam mechanism, the flexion/extension (F/E) movement module is designed and the details used to ensure the safety and reliability of the device are introduced. Then, a novel A/A movement module is proposed, using the components that can easily individualized design to achieve active A/A motion only by one single motor, which makes up for the shortcomings of the existing devices. As for the control system, a fuzzy proportional-derivative (PD) adaptive impedance control strategy based on the position information is proposed, which can make the device more compliant, avoid secondary injuries caused by excessive muscle tension, and protect the fingers effectively. Finally, some preliminary experiments of the prototype are reported, and the results shows that the EFRR has good performance, which lays the foundation for future work.

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there are more than 15 million people around the world suffer strokes every year, and about 5 million of them are permanently disabled. Moreover, the global lifetime risk of stroke from the age of 25 years onward has increased from 22.8% in 1990 to 24.9% in 2016. Stroke is still the main cause of death worldwide [1,2,3]. Stroke causes damage to the nervous system, and can cause patients to lose part or all of their ability for activities of daily living (ADL), which brings a heavy burden to the family and society. Currently, the functional impairment of the fingers poststroke is rarely considered life-threatening. Together with the limited resources (time, cost, number of the caregivers and equipment etc.), it rates low on the priority of rehabilitation tasks [4,5,6]. In some ways, this increases the number of people with finger injury sequelae. Therefore, research on finger rehabilitation after stroke should be given more attention.
Rehabilitation robots can assist poststroke patients with continuous, repetitive training with a standardized process, reducing the workload of therapists and providing more clinical options for patients. Hand rehabilitation robots can be divided into end-effector devices, exoskeletons and glove type in terms of wearing form [7]. Among all the end-effector devices, Amadeo [8,9] is the most commercially successful hand rehabilitation robot available. HandCARE [10] adopts ropes to fix fingers, and a clutch system is designed to allow all the fingers to be driven by only one motor. Rutgers Master II [11] is a four-degree-of-freedom pneumatically driven finger rehabilitation device which has been clinically tested. It achieves active flexion/extension (F/E) motion for four fingers, and the maximum output force can reach 16.4 N. Reha-Digit [12] is a passive rehabilitation device: patients need to put the fingers into four plastic roller sets during the training process. SAFE [13] drives the patient’s fingertips to do rehabilitation exercises by using rigid connecting rod structures. In addition, some universities have conducted researches on end-effector finger rehabilitation devices [14,15]. As for the exoskeletons, the robot developed by Gifu University [16] controls all of the fingers independently by arranging side-by-side dual motors on the back of the hand. The researchers at the University of Texas at Austin [17,18] applied the series elastic actuator (SEA) to finger rehabilitation. Their device uses Bowden cables to transmit power and obtains joint information through angle sensors, and it is lightweight and easy-to-wear by moving the motors outside of the back of the hand. The rehabilitation robotic exoskeleton hand [19] realizes finger F/E training through two worm gears, and passive pins are set to achieve adduction/abduction(A/A) motion simultaneously and a virtual reality system has been developed for rehabilitation scenarios. The Powered Finger–Thumb Wearable Hand Exoskeleton [20] adopts an under-driven cord control form and designed a self-alignment mechanism that prevents misalignment for the joints between the human and machine, besides, parallel mechanism has been attempt to applied on the hand rehabilitation [21]. The glove-type devices have developed significantly in recent years due to their good adaptability. Their driving form includes pneumatic [22,23], cord drive [24], layered reed drive [25,26,27] and so on.
Force-based control is one of the control strategies for finger rehabilitation robots [28]. Cheng et al. [29] proposed a controller combing the iterative learning control (ILC) and the active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) to adapt the repeating training manner and overcome the external interference in a wearable hand rehabilitation robot. Park et al. [30] used proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control to design a control strategy capable of automatically switching between position and force control. Chiri et al. [31] utilized the PID control strategy to compensate for the external forces exerted by the patient on the robot. Huang et al. [32] proposed a variable integral PID (VIPID) controller to track the patients’ finger trajectory which has better performance than the conventional ones. Jones et al. [33] used a PI controller to compensate the auxiliary torque for fingers, and the control of either position or torque can be implemented in this device. Polygerinos et al. [34] presented a sliding-mode controller (SMC) for their finger rehabilitation robot with the obvious advantage of not requiring an explicit model of the system for the synthesis of the controller.
The large number of degrees of freedom (DoF) and strong interjoint coupling in human fingers make the development of finger rehabilitation robots difficult, leading to the complex structure and difficulty in wearing most of the existing devices. The inability of the fingers to perform A/A motion is one of the signs of nerve damage [35], which affects the patient’s ability to ADL. The active A/A exercise can carry out targeted muscle strength training on the palmar interossei and the dorsal interossei, and fully open the range of motion of the MCP joint [36]. However, few existing robots can achieve active A/A training and cannot fully open the joint mobility of the fingers, which affects the rehabilitation outcome and patient experience. As for the control strategy, it is mainly based on the PID, and the corresponding strategy is developed for the characteristics of the developed equipment.
This paper presents the design and development of an end-effector finger rehabilitation robot (EFRR) (see Figure 1). EFRR utilizes a fixed pulley-track module for finger F/E motion, and a novel synchronous pulley set has been proposed for active A/A motion driven by a single motor. This allows patients to open up their joint mobility fully. EFRR has two thumb rehabilitation structures with left/right symmetry, which makes it possible for functional impairment of the left/right hand to train on the device and can reduce the cost greatly. The design above is also the result of a comprehensive consideration of wearing convenience, hand weight bearing, and manufacturing cost. In terms of control strategy, an adaptive control strategy based on fuzzy PD is designed according to the characteristics of the EFRR, which makes it compliant during the training process and ensures the safety of patients.
Figure 1. Prototype of the EFRR. EFRR: end-effector finger rehabilitation robot.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the innovative structural design of the EFRR, including the design principles and rationale; Section 3 introduces the adaptive control strategy based on fuzzy PD; Section 4 shows the preliminary experiments conducted at the EFRR and the related analysis; finally, Section 5 concludes this study and provides suggestions for future work.
More at link.

No comments:

Post a Comment