Robotic Characterization of Ipsilesional Motor Function in Subacute Stroke

Why are we discussing and describing this crap rather than coming up with solutions? Are you that goddamned lazy? Isn't the focus of stroke research supposed to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery? NOTHING LESS!
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1545968317704903

Show all authors

Jennifer A. Semrau, PhD, Troy M. Herter, PhD, Jeffrey M. Kenzie, Sonja E. Findlater, Stephen H. Scott, PhD, Sean P. Dukelow, MD, PhD

First Published April 26, 2017

Abstract

Background. Poststroke impairments of the ipsilesional arm are often discussed, but rarely receive focused rehabilitation. Ipsilesional deficits may affect daily function and although many studies have investigated them in chronic stroke, few characterizations have been made in the subacute phase. Furthermore, most studies have quantified ipsilesional deficits using clinical measures that can fail to detect subtle, but important deficits in motor function.  
Objective. We aimed to quantify reaching deficits of the contra- and ipsilesional limbs in the subacute phase poststroke.  
Methods. A total of 227 subjects with first-time, unilateral stroke completed a unilateral assessment of motor function (visually guided reaching) using a KINARM robot. Subjects completed the task with both the ipsi- and contralesional arms. Subjects were assessed on a variety of traditional clinical measures (Functional Independence Measure, Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment, Purdue Pegboard, Behavioral Inattention Test) to compare with robotic measures of motor function.  
Results. Ipsilesional deficits were common and occurred in 37% (n = 84) of subjects. Impairments of the ipsilesional and contralesional arm were weakly to moderately correlated on robotic measures. Magnitude of impairment of the contralesional arm was similar for subjects with and without ipsilesional deficits. Furthermore, we found that a higher percentage of subjects with right-hemisphere stroke had ipsilesional deficits and more subjects with left-hemisphere subcortical strokes did not have ipsilesional deficits.  
Conclusions. Magnitude of contralesional impairment and lesion location may be poor predictors of individuals with ipsilesional impairments after stroke. Careful characterization of ipsilesional deficits could identify individuals who may benefit from rehabilitation of the less affected arm.