Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label silos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label silos. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF A MOBILE APP FOR EVERYDAY STROKE REHABILITATION

Once again working on the edges of useful stroke research, the rehabilitation silo only works fully 10% of the time. In other words a complete failure. 

PRELIMINARY EVALUATION  OF A MOBILE APP FOR  EVERYDAY STROKE  REHABILITATION


Sonia Lawson*, Jin Guo, Ted Smith, Ziying Tang, Jinjuan Feng
*
Dept. of Occupational Therapy &
Occupational Science
,
Dept.
of Computer and
Information Sciences
Towson
University
ABSTRACT
A smartphone-based    rehabilitation    approach called ARMStrokes was developed that provides real-time  support  for  stroke survivors to  complete rehabilitation exercises  for
upper  extremity  recovery.  A pilot study of 10 stroke survivors was conducted to
examine  the  usability  and usefulness of  the application.  In  addition,  a  web-based  collaborative communication  system  was  evaluated for usability and  efficiency  by    therapists,  physicians,  and caregivers  monitoring  client  adherence  to  prescribed
home exercise  programs.  Post-test   quantitative improvements  were  noted  and  feedback  from focus groups involving stroke survivors, caregivers, and therapists  have  been  positive.  The  findings  assisted with  modifications  to  the  app  and the collaborative system.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Case Series of a Knowledge Translation Intervention to Increase Upper Limb Exercise in Stroke Rehabilitation

These people are still going down the wrong path; assuming that the rehabilitation silo is the way to improve recovery. WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, You go earlier in the cause and effect cycle and stop the neuronal cascade of death by these 5 causes in the first week.  I really do wonder if any people in stroke have two functioning neurons they can rub together. And they don't even tell us the fucking results. Did the survivors have a better recovery? JEESH! Did these researchers get their hands slapped by our MIA great stroke association president?
http://ptjournal.apta.org/content/early/2016/06/22/ptj.20150694.abstract
Louise A. Connell, Naoimh E. McMahon, Sarah F. Tyson, Caroline L. Watkins, Janice J. Eng

Medium f*cking whoopee.

Abstract

Background and Purpose Current approaches to upper limb rehabilitation are not sufficient to drive neural reorganisation and maximise recovery after stroke. To address this evidence-practice gap we developed a knowledge translation intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel. The intervention involves collaborative working with stroke therapy teams to change their practice, and increase therapy intensity by therapists prescribing supplementary self-directed arm exercise. The purposes of this case series are: (1) to provide an illustrative example of how a research-informed process changed clinical practice and (2) to report on staff and patients' perceptions (Who gives a shit about perceptions?)of the utility of the developed intervention.
Case Descriptions A participatory action research approach was used in three stroke rehabilitation units in the United Kingdom. The intervention aimed to change four therapist level behaviours: (i) screening patients for suitability for supplementary self-directed arm exercise, (ii) provision of exercises, (iii) involving family/carers in assisting with exercises and (iv) monitoring and progressing exercises. Data on changes in practice were collected by therapy teams using a bespoke audit tool. Utility of the intervention was explored in qualitative interviews with patients and staff.
Outcomes Components of the intervention were successfully embedded in two of the three stroke units. At these sites almost all admitted patients were screened for suitability for supplementary self-directed exercise. 77%, 70% and 88% of suitable patients across the three sites were provided exercises. Involving family/carers, and monitoring and progressing exercises, were not performed consistently.
Conclusions This study is an example of how a rigorous research-informed knowledge translation process resulted in practice change. Further research is needed to demonstrate that these changes can translate into increased intensity of upper limb exercise and affect patient outcomes.
  • Received December 24, 2015.
  • Accepted May 30, 2016.

Thursday, June 16, 2016

Improving rehabilitation after stroke - DR PENELOPE MCNULTY

Sorry doctor you are completely wrong. You are stuck in current thinking rather than what is possible with a little bit of research.  The easiest way to improve rehabilitation is by stopping the neuronal cascade of death by these 5 causes. You are going down the route of improving the rehabilitation silo which currently only has a success rate of 10% full recovery. A great stroke association leader would be traveling the world making sure doctors don't make stupid statements like these. They would be promoting a defined strategy that would solve all the problems in stroke.

Improving rehabilitation after stroke - DR PENELOPE MCNULTY
Every year more than 60,000 Australians suffer a stroke and this number will only increase with the aging population the growing epidemics of obesity, physical inactivity and diabetes.
Because there is no cure for stroke, the only method to improve functional movement is through rehabilitation. But we need to understand how rehabilitation works, and which patients will benefit most.
We are studying patients who have weakness on one side of their body 3-12 months after a single stroke. We are comparing a new and promising strategy, Wii therapy, against the current best practice – constraint induced movement therapy in a randomised control trial.
Both therapies have been shown to improve upper limb functional movement after an intense 2 week program of rehabilitation.

Friday, June 19, 2015

Ottawa region among best at rapid stroke treatment but rehab needs work

Big whoopee Eh!
They still are looking at this wrong. The assumption that rehabilitation is the be all and end all is wrong. With only 10% getting to full recovery the rehab silo is a failure, so you have to get earlier in the process and stop the neuronal cascade of death. Doesn't anyone in stroke ever use their brain at all?
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/stroke-rate-in-ottawa-region-drops

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Why are stroke survivors being written off? A UK article

They are written off because the appalling full recovery rate is only 10%. The rehabilitation silo is not where the focus should be on helping survivors. In order to help survivors we need to limit the damage that occurs during the first week in the neuronal cascade of death. That would allow the existing rehabilitation pushed by therapists to get most patients close to normal functioning. But until a strategy is written up and followed for how to attack all the problems in stroke will anything useful get done.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/mar/31/stroke-survivors-being-written-off-care-homes

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

All physios involved in stroke care should participate in national audit, urges CSP

This article just proves once again that there is no understanding that if you are going to improve stroke recovery you need to get much earlier in the process by stopping the neuronal cascade of death in the first week. These people think that improvements in their silo are  the answer. Highly unlikely since only 10% fully recover, even if you triple that rate it is still a failure at 30%.
http://www.csp.org.uk/news/2015/01/08/all-physios-involved-stroke-care-should-participate-national-audit-urges-csp

Monday, November 10, 2014

Stroke Unit Care Benefits Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage

But you didn't follow the results all the way thru to % recovery.  That would prove that even with less death and disability they still don't know how to get survivors to 100% recovery. We have stroke medical staff so focused on their specialty that they can't see the failure in the big picture. Only 10% get to full recovery. Once again we see no new research, just lazy meta-analysis.
FIX that!!!
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/44/11/3044.abstract
  1. Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, MD
  2. on behalf of the Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration
+ Author Affiliations
  1. From the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom (P.L., P.F.); Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Norway (O.M.R.); Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland (M.K., H.P.); Acute Stroke Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Greece (K.V.); Department of Stroke Medicine, King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom (L.K.); Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (B.I.); Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Sweden (C.B.); Institute of Ageing and Health, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (H.R.); and Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (M.S.D., R.A.-S.S.).
  1. Correspondence to Peter Langhorne, PhD, Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Level 4, Walton Building, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, United Kingdom. E-mail Peter.Langhorne@glasgow.ac.uk

Abstract

Background and Purpose—Patients with any type of stroke managed in organized inpatient (stroke unit) care are more likely to survive, return home, and regain independence. However, it is uncertain whether these benefits apply equally to patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke.
Methods—We conducted a secondary analysis of a systematic review of controlled clinical trials comparing stroke unit care with general ward care, including only trials published after 1990 that could separately report outcomes for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. We performed random-effects meta-analyses and tested for subgroup interactions by stroke type.
Results—We identified 13 trials (3570 patients) of modern stroke unit care that recruited patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke, of which 8 trials provided data on 2657 patients. Stroke unit care reduced death or dependency (risk ratio [RR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.471–0.92; P=0.0009; I2=60%) with no difference in benefits for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61–1.00) than patients with ischemic stroke (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70–0.97; Pinteraction=0.77). Stroke unit care reduced death (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64–0.97; P=0.02; I2=49%) to a greater extent for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54–0.97) than patients with ischemic stroke (RR, 0.82; 95%, CI 0.61–1.09), but this difference was not statistically significant (Pinteraction=0.58).
Conclusions—Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage seem to benefit at least as much as patients with ischemic stroke from organized inpatient (stroke unit) care.

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

How many hours of therapy do you need to do to recover from a stroke?

Malcolm Gladwell's highly popular book, Outliers, estimates 10,000 hours as the time it takes to become a high-level athlete or musician.
First you would need to accurately know how many muscles were affected by your stroke, split between just damaged in the penumbra and the dead ones. I'm sure your neurologist has no f*cking clue as to the answer to that question.
The damaged ones are the only ones counted here

A (slightly tongue-in-cheek) tally of the body’s many muscles

The grand total

Well, this is how I calculate it. We have …
  • 200 muscles that might get discussed in a gym
  • 100 more muscles that are pretty obscure, but any self-respecting massage therapist still knows about them
  • 400 more muscles that are really danged obscure, but various specialists know about them, and a handful of them are of special interest
  • several million hair-raising muscles
  • several billion smooth muscles cells blended together
  • exactly 1 heart muscle
So I’m going to go with a grand total of approximately 50,100,000,701 muscles, accurate to within 99%.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's say you blew out all of your motor cortex on one side and taking the first three bullets that would mean 350 muscles needing retraining.
I'll make it simple and assume that there is one specific exercise for each muscle, Think of body builders and what they do to get that definition.
350 * 10,000 = 3.5 million hours needed to totally recover.
24 hours a day * 365 days = 8760 hours in a year
If you worked constantly all year you might be able to recover one muscle
3.5m/8760 = 399.54 years before you are completely recovered and you are not going to be able to ever sleep again. Lots of Red Bulls for you.
And do you really think your therapist has stroke protocols for each voluntary muscle in the body?

This is why the rehabilitation silo as currently set up is not where the solution to stroke recovery is. The solution is preventing neuronal death in the first week. Then rehabilitation might have a chance to get people to recovery. 

I look forward to therapists and neurologists around the world telling me exactly why I'm wrong and providing exact calculations for recovery.  That'll be the day, by Buddy Holly.

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Nexstim Announces New Stroke Therapy Produced Significant Gains in Motor Function Post-Stroke

And once again rehabilitation departments(RIC this time) are not looking beyond their own silo. Damn, do they not have any understanding that if you stop the neuronal cascade of death you will have less dead and damaged neurons and thus your existing protocols will work much better. I'm working on a letter to the president of the RIC laying out all their failures.
http://www.fortmilltimes.com/2014/02/14/3288083/nexstim-announces-new-stroke-therapy.html
Every two seconds someone in the world suffers a stroke. A study from the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago approached stroke rehabilitation through a new combination of therapies which produced significantly greater gains in patients’ motor function 6 months post-stroke. The combination of non-invasive navigated transcranial stimulation (nTMS) along with occupational therapy (OT) opened the door to improving the quality of life for stroke survivors. The study presented Thursday at the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Stroke Association’s (ASA) International Stroke Conference, yielded results from the active group of improved function by 13+ points in UEFM score.
“The results obtained in the Contrastim trial provide evidence that non-invasive neurostimulation has major potential for improving motor function in stroke sufferers.” – Jarmo Laine, MD, Nexstim VP of Medical Affairs
The Study
Dr. Richard Harvey and his team at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC) presented their research (presentation #152) which looked at the combination of non-invasive nTMS along with OT in post-stroke patients.
“It helped me greatly. It’s just immeasurable the progress that I have made.” – Dwayne Nelson, stroke trial patient
Treatment consisted of 20 minutes of pre-functional OT, 17 minutes of nTMS, followed by 60 minutes of upper limb task-oriented OT. Patients received treatment during 3 visits per week, for 6 weeks, as the standard of care in the US. They then returned for follow-up visits at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. The study found that Nexstim’s non-invasive Navigated Brain Stimulation (NBS) System used as an adjunct to therapy promoted lasting improvements in patients’ motor function compared to the sham group.
“What we found is that there are areas of the brain, usually where the lesion is, that are less active than they used to be, and that there are actually areas on the brain on the opposite hemisphere, the healthy side of the brain, that are more active than they used to be.” – Lynn Rogers, PhD, Director, Neuralplasticity Laboratory, RIC

More about the technology at the link.

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Satisfaction with care and rehabilitation among people with stroke, from hospital to community care

Why would you expect satisfaction when only 10% fully recover? And having rehab performed by a professional doesn't mean anything when they still don't know what they are doing.
The conclusion is wrong, you need to stop the neuronal cascade of death resulting is much less disability. They can't think outside their own silo.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/scs.12116/abstract;jsessionid=20D81ED08D41E6B1BCC06E1CA1A6F803.f04t03?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false
  1. Helena Tholin MSc, RPT Physiotherapy Supervisor1,2,*,
  2. Anette Forsberg PhD, RPT Lecturer1,3
Article first published online: 5 FEB 2014
DOI: 10.1111/scs.12116

Keywords:

  • stroke;
  • quality of care;
  • rehabilitation;
  • patient participation;
  • qualitative approaches;
  • research in practice

Background

Despite recent improvements in Swedish stroke care some patients still experience a lack of support and follow-up after discharge from hospital. In order to provide good care according to the National Board of Health and Welfare, systematic evaluations of stroke care must be performed. Quality indicators in the national guidelines could be useful when measuring quality of care in all parts of the stroke care chain.

Aim

To investigate how people with stroke experienced their care, rehabilitation, support, and participation from hospital to community care.

Method

Qualitative interviews were performed with 11 people in 2009–2010 covering their experiences of care, rehabilitation, support, and participation. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis.

Result

The interviewees were satisfied with their hospital care, but reported both positive and negative experiences of the continuing care. Most of them appreciated intense, specific, and professional rehabilitation, and had experienced these qualities in the rehabilitation they received in most parts of the stroke care chain. Those who received support from the community services expressed satisfaction with the staff, but also felt that autonomy was lost. Several did not feel involved in the health care planning, but instead relied on the judgement of the staff.

Conclusion

To ensure high quality throughout the whole stroke care chain, people with stroke must be invited to participate in the care and the planning of care. To offer evidence-based stroke rehabilitation, it is important that the rehabilitation is specific, intense, and performed by professionals, regardless of where the rehabilitation is performed. A changed view of the patient's autonomy in residential community services should be developed, and this process must start from the staff and residents.

Friday, January 10, 2014

National stroke summit tour convenes physicians across the U.S. to advance optimal stroke care delivery

It just started and already should be considered a failure. See if you can attend and challenge everything they say.
Nothing in here on;
1. Interventions in the ambulance.
2. Diagnosis in the ambulance.
3. Anything at all to stop the neuronal cascade of death.
4. The 12% efficacy rate of tPA
5. They are stuck in assuming that their silo is the most important.

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/national-stroke-summit-tour-convenes-physicians-across-the-us-to-advance-optimal-stroke-care-delivery-239419661.html
The Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) today has launched a 2014 national tour that will bring together physicians and medical personnel across the nation involved in stroke care to address current stroke treatment in the U.S. and the value of neurointerventional therapy in optimal stroke care delivery.  Ranked the fourth leading cause of death in the United States by the American Stroke Association, stroke is a complex disease that requires the input of a diverse group of medical professionals in a short period of time to facilitate timely and accurate diagnosis and treatment to achieve optimal outcomes.
"This is an exciting initiative for our society and our physicians," said Philip Meyers, MD, Associate Professor of Radiology and Neurological Surgery at Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, Director of Neuroendovascular Services at New York Presbyterian Hospitals and President of SNIS. "Instead of waging the war on stroke in isolation at our individual hospitals, SNIS physicians are facilitating a national conversation on some of the most important treatment issues and challenges facing the stroke community today."
Stroke Summit 2014: Excellence in Patient Care launched today in Houston and is scheduled in 12 cities across the U.S. in the next three months, including, Dallas, Miami, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Las Vegas. The summits will host the multiple physicians and personnel considered to be part of any hospital "stroke team," including first responders, emergency room physicians, radiologists, neurologists, neurointerventional surgeons and others. Currently, these medical professionals practice in over one thousand primary and approximately 60 comprehensive stroke centers across the United States, all of which are certified to offer coordinated systems of care, including stroke prevention, optimal use of EMS, effective acute and subacute stroke care, and rehabilitation.  
The stroke summit initiative is anticipated to highlight the complex and nuanced factors involved in the treatment of stroke, a condition that, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), occurs every 40 seconds and leads to more than 130,000 deaths annually.  Despite its impact, however, various measures over the last two decades have resulted in a decline in death rates – more than 30 percent from 1995 to 2005.  SNIS and other stakeholders in the stroke community are committed to taking action to further reduce the impact of stroke on individuals, families and communities.
"We've made great strides in the battle against stroke through public education campaigns, advances in science that include neurointerventional techniques and the creation of specialty stroke centers with the necessary personnel, equipment and therapies to treat stroke effectively," said Meyers. "Alongside all these initiatives, it is equally important to focus efforts inside the hospital environment where collaboration among the stroke team to execute appropriate stroke treatment can make the real difference for patients who entrust their lives to us in their time of crisis."
The most prevalent type of stroke is acute ischemic stroke which occurs when a blood vessel that carries oxygen and nutrients to the brain is blocked by a clot. When this happens, part of the brain is deprived of the blood and oxygen it needs, causing brain cells to die at a rate of two million per minute and increasing the risk of permanent brain damage, disability or death. Neurointerventional therapy is a minimally invasive treatment that can eliminate the clot directly at the site of the blockage.  Under fluoroscopic (x-ray) guidance, physicians thread a catheter through the arteries from the point of entry at the groin up to the site of the stroke in the brain.  Through the catheter, clot-busting drugs or devices are utilized to eliminate the blockage and restore normal blood flow through the vessel.
Neurointerventional techniques to treat stroke have evolved over the past decade, expanding the treatment window from three hours up to eight for certain patients and providing thousands of new options for minimally invasive stroke care.
About SNISFounded in 1992, the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) includes physicians who specialize in minimally invasive techniques to treat neurovascular conditions, including stroke, aneurysms, carotid stenosis and spinal abnormalities. Drawing on diverse backgrounds and expertise including interventional neuroradiology, neurosurgery and neurology, these physicians are continuing to forge new pathways in the development of the distinct specialty of neurointervention. Over the past two decades, practitioners of this field have paved the way for the scientific research and study that has resulted in new technology and revolutionary treatment approaches that have transformed the neurosciences. In keeping with the mission of SNIS, the society remains committed to working in partnership to advance the science and medical environment that will result in enhanced quality of care for patients across the globe. www.snisonline.org. Follow us on Twitter @SNISinfo.
CONTACT: Thy-Ann Nguyen, TogoRun, Office: 202-828-5070, Cell: 703-638-2938, t.nguyen@togorun.com
SOURCE Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Stroke’s Global Burden of Death and Disability Highlights Need for Awareness, Prevention, and Rehabilitative Strategies

A great paper from the Dana Foundation. I'll comment on several sections. Full paper available at link.
http://www.dana.org/media/detail.aspx?id=44906

Few medical conditions, neurological or otherwise, exact a greater public-health toll than stroke, a fact underscored by a new published report on the global burden of stroke. An acute brain injury that may begin insidiously years prior, stroke is now the second leading cause of death and the third most common cause of disability worldwide. Nearly 17 million people in the world will have a first stroke in the next year, and 33 million people are stroke survivors.
In the U.S., stroke is the No. 1 cause of serious long-term disability. Approximately 800,000 strokes occur annually in this country, and about 130,000 people die annually from stroke. The risk of stroke has decreased by roughly 70 percent in the U.S. since incidence was first tracked in the mid-1900’s, a downward trend that has not plateaued, suggesting there is still room for improvement. Stroke risk factors are well known, and experts estimate that 80 percent of strokes could be prevented with better management of hypertension, blood lipids, and glucose.
Getting Aggressive About Prevention
“Most people believe there could be substantial, dramatic stroke reduction if we just really aggressively managed the risk factors we currently know about,” says Walter Koroshetz, M.D., deputy director of the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke and a member of the Dana Alliance for Brain Initiatives. “In many diseases, you need a major scientific breakthrough to make a difference. That’s not true with stroke.”
Except you could reduce stroke risk by hundreds of percents following these;
Green tea and coffee 20%  - Green tea, coffee may reduce stroke risk by 20 percent

Potassium 21%   Why eat three bananas a day?
 Marijuana buds 50%  A Marijuana Bud A Day Keeps The Stroke Away

 Dietary magnesium 8% Higher magnesium intake associated with reduced ischemic stroke risk
Mediterranean diet 30% - Mediterranean Diet Proven Key In Avoiding Heart Disease And Stroke

lycopene - tomatoes 55%  -Tomatoes Linked to Lower Stroke Risk


Fish 6% - Does Eating Two Fish a Day REALLY Keep the Chance of Stroke Away?

 Chocolate eating 17%Eating small bar of chocolate cuts risks of stroke in men


Walking 43% - Walking wards off stroke for women
Speed walking 50% - Speed Walking Halves Stroke Risk
Dietary fiber 7% -    More Dietary Fiber Might Help Thwart Stroke
Total 307%

Opening the Window for Acute Treatment
Public-health advocates have tried for years to drive home the message that strokes require immediate medical attention, ever since a treatment became available that could help some people with ischemic stroke, which occurs when blood flow to part of the brain is restricted by a clot or narrowed blood vessel. Tissue plasminogen activator, or tPA, is still the only drug approved for treating acute stroke, but its use is severely limited, largely because published guidelines call for it to be administered within three hours of stroke onset for most patients. Some experts have criticized these guidelines and are calling for them to be revised.
With a pathetic 12% efficacy that means that they are lying about 88% of the results 

Public Awareness Still Lacking
The advent of tPA has triggered a system-wide reorganization of stroke urgent care that is still evolving nearly 17 years later. For example, specialized stroke centers have been established where expert care, along with the tools and technologies for swift, accurate diagnosis, is readily available. A tiered system based on minimum requirements, much like the system that designates hospitals as Level 1-4 trauma centers depending on their capabilities, is being put in place for stroke care as well, so that patients can be transported to the most advanced center in their area. While there have been vast improvements, a number of obstacles remain. Primary among them is public awareness, experts say.
“Public knowledge about stroke is still very low,” says Caplan. “This is the more difficult problem, because a lot of people don’t know they’ve had a stroke.”
The real problem here is that there is no easy objective way to diagnose a stroke. Friends have been in ERs for hours because the stroke hadn't established severe enough effects to be obvious. That should be accomplished with the tricorder possibly thru one of these 17 ways. 
Better Rehab Through Brain Science
The Global Burden of Disease report underscores the dichotomy between richer, developed countries like the U.S., where the majority of people who suffer a stroke survive, and poorer, developing countries where people are more likely to die from a stroke. While cutting stroke deaths is a major global-health goal, better recovery and rehabilitation strategies are desperately needed to address the ever-growing population of stroke survivors who struggle to function with varying degrees of disability.
“We have in the U.S. alone 800,000 people who have a stroke each year. So the question becomes, what can be done to return functional recovery to those patients?” says Koroshetz. “That’s where the really interesting science is, because it intersects with the area of neuroplasticity–how the brain learns to function for a particular purpose and how it rewires itself to get lost function back.”
You have this all wrong, you need to stop the neuronal cascade of death resulting in much less death and disability. The silo of rehabilitation is not where the breakthroughs are going to occur because no one knows exactly how to make neuroplasticity repeatable.
Brain Recovery Not Passive
Armed with such investigational tools, neuroscience has already revealed some fundamental principles of recovery in the brain. “The general rule, at least in the cortex, is that somehow the brain recovers function after an initial injury, whether it’s a stroke or some other lesion,” says Koroshetz. “Now people are studying how that happens, and the hope is that we can translate that to therapeutic strategies.”
One key finding already, Koroshetz says, is that recovery from injury is not “passive.” Rather, it requires enhancement by active exposure to sensory stimuli or motor practice. He points to the LEAPS study, which was the first large randomized, controlled clinical trial that investigated recovery of locomotor function in people who had had a stroke. The NIH-funded study compared two fairly intensive therapies: treadmill walking vs. strength and balance training performed at home with a physical therapist. A third group, serving as controls, received “standard of care”–whatever physical therapy or rehab they were getting as part of their regular medical care.
‘Standard of Care’ Substandard?
What the hell is the standard of care for stroke? Does anyone know?

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Have You Told Congress to Stop the Therapy Caps Yet?

More proof that the NSA hasn't figured out yet that the therapy silo is not where the focus needs to be. The stupidity continues,if you want less disabled survivors you stop the neuronal cascade of death in the first week. These 177 possibilities need research. If they really want to help existing survivors they would sponsor research that finds out how to make neuroplasticity easily and consistently repeatable.GAH, more proof that 2 functioning brain cells do not exist there.
Todays email.

Stroke Advocacy Network - Take Action

Dear dean,
Stop the Therapy Cap
We’ll give it to you straight. If you haven’t had a chance to tell Congress that access to outpatient physical, occupational and speech therapy services must be maintained for stroke survivors on Medicare, do it soon before it’s too late!
On Jan. 1, 2014, Medicare will cap, or limit, outpatient therapy services to a certain dollar amount each year, even if the patient needs more care. Today, a process exists for stroke survivors to get more therapy services than the caps allow. This “exceptions process” lets healthcare providers and stroke survivors decide on a treatment plan that makes sense for the survivor’s recovery, not just Medicare’s financial bottom line. However, the exceptions process is scheduled to expire on Dec. 31. Only Congress can prevent that from happening. Congress has five weeks to take action and extend the exceptions process beyond 2013.
Five weeks seems like a long time. Maybe you haven’t taken action on this issue yet because you’re thinking “oh, this can wait.” But it can’t. Many organizations and individuals are asking Congress to take action on their issues in the short time Congress has left to work in 2013. The stroke community must make its voice heard on the Medicare therapy caps issue to ensure that it gets on Congress’ list of “to do’s” this year.
Take action today on this important issue
We’ve made contacting them easy. We’ve drafted a message that you can personalize and send to your members of Congress.
Five minutes of your time could help stroke survivors across the country who need more therapy than the caps allow to recover to their fullest potential. Join us and make a difference today!
Sincerely,
signed by Coral Cosway
Coral Cosway
Director, Policy Advocacy

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

A changing stroke rehabilitation environment: Implications for upper limb interventions

These people are stuck in their own silo. The way to better upper limb recovery is through less dead and damaged neurons by stopping the neuronal cascade of death.
http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/45672/1/Jones_PH_AuthorDraft.pdf
Abstract— Functional recovery of the upper limb is poor and as
many as 50% of stroke survivors still have impairments at 6
months post stroke, despite rehabilitation efforts. With the move
towards early supported discharge and community-based
rehabilitation, novel solutions are needed to deliver the amount of
quality therapy that is required for optimum recovery. We
propose a rehabilitation aid that provides patients with
augmented visual feedback of their motor performance during
task orientated upper limb therapy with the aim of facilitating
motor relearning and maximising patients functional outcomes.

Six pages of obvious conclusions.
In one word - repetition.

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Kirk working to improve care for stroke patients

If he is your senator you need to contact him and tell him that rehabilitation silo is not the area that needs focus. Prevention of the neuronal cascade of death will help more than any focus on rehab. He needs to talk to intelligent stroke survivors rather than the stroke medical teams because they don't have any clue about getting to 100% recovery.
http://www.wics.com/template/inews_wire/wires.regional.il/30face81-wics.com.shtml

Physiotherapy for patients with mobility problems more than 1 year after stroke: a randomised controlled trial

Once again proving that therapy is not the easy solution to recovery problems.  Probably not enough repetitions. This should lead to the recognition that stopping the neuronal cascade of death will result in less dead and damaged neurons.  Why can't these people look at the big picture and make appropriate corrections rather than staying within their own silo(area of expertise)?
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2802%2907443-3/fulltext
The Lancet, Volume 359, Issue 9302, Pages 199 - 203, 19 January 2002
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07443-3Cite or Link Using DOI

Summary

Background

Community physiotherapy is often prescribed for stroke patients with long-term mobility problems. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of this treatment in patients who had mobility problems 1 year after stroke.

Methods

We screened 359 patients older than 50 years for a single-masked, randomised controlled trial to assess the effects of community physiotherapy. Assessments were made at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months in 170 eligible patients assigned treatment or no intervention. The primary outcome measure was mobility measured by the Rivermead mobility index. Secondary outcome measures were gait speed, number of falls, daily activity (Barthel index scores), social activity (Frenchay activities index), hospital anxiety and depression scale, and emotional stress of carers (general health questionnaire 28). Analyses were by intention to treat.

Findings

Follow-up was available for 146 patients (86%). Changes in scores on the Rivermead mobility index (score range 0—15) differed significantly between treatment and control groups at 3 months (p=0·018), but only by a median of 1 point (95% CI 0—1), with an interpolated value of 0·55 (0·08—1·04). Gait speed was 2·6 m/min (0·30—4·95) higher in the treatment group at 3 months. Neither treatment effect persisted at 6-months' and 9-months' follow-up. Treatment had no effect on patients' daily activity, social activity, anxiety, depression, and number of falls, or on emotional stress of carers.

Interpretation

Community physiotherapy treatment for patients with mobility problems 1 year after stroke leads to significant, but clinically small, improvements in mobility and gait speed that are not sustained after treatment ends.
 

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

New Technologies for Stroke Rehabilitation

These 2 pages don't really tell us anything new. But it does show an incredibly bad case of thinking only in your own silo.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?hl=en&q=http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/srt/aip/815814.pdf&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm2IaBx6ZydMRbYx8oICgpg5HOWUeg&oi=scholaralrt
These observations result in line with the proposal to change the research question from “is a specific technology effective?” into “how may I use this technology in an effective way?” as suggested by Iosa [5] and “for which patients is this technology effective” as suggested by Morone [6]. Robotic devices, for example, were shown to be more effective for severely affected patients, whereas rehabilitative outcomes after robotic training resulted similar to those of conventional manual therapy for moderately affected patients.

The bolded questions really needs to be changed to; How do I get patients to not need this type of therapy or technology?
The answer to that is to reduce the damage of the stroke by applying hyperacute therapies that stop the neuronal cascade of death.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Setting up great stroke units may need painful decisions

This is a great example of a profession that needs to step out of its silo and recognize that they wouldn't have to make these difficult decisions if the patients coming in were less disabled because they had been treated with hyperacute therapies that stopped the neuronal cascade of death, saving millions of neurons from dying. Think people, think.
http://www.nursingtimes.net/nursing-practice/clinical-zones/older-people/setting-up-great-stroke-units-may-need-painful-decisions-/5051892.article?blocktitle=Practice-comment&contentID=6854
The launch of the National Stroke Strategy in 2007 enabled those of us working in stroke care to start making changes to improve stroke care and stroke services. The follow-up Progress in Improving Stroke Care report published in 2010, showed that while we were improving nationally there was still so much more that we could do.
The launch of the National Stroke Strategy in 2007 enabled those of us working in stroke care to start making changes to improve stroke care and stroke services. The follow-up Progress in Improving Stroke Care report published in 2010, showed that while we were improving nationally there was still so much more that we could do.
So how do we provide the best possible care that includes all the standards set out by the stroke strategy? To most, it involves establishing a fully functioning, 24/7 centre of excellence that provides all the staff and facilities required to deliver excellent stroke care.
However the reality is very different. Developing these services is costly and with the NHS in its current financial climate, trusts are trying to save money, not spend it. The situation is further complicated by stroke services being split over a number of hospital sites or bordering hospital trusts.
Often the outcome is to restructure and amalgamate services, to potentially save money and become more efficient, by condensing the stroke pathway either by reducing or removing services from some places. This can be done across a number of trusts or, in larger trusts, across multiple sites to provide one main site for development.
Naturally, this causes upset to the staff involved and to the patients themselves. For nurses the first question is: will I lose my job? No one should lose their job but they should be prepared for a change of role or environment.
With restructuring services, the pathway will change but it can provide opportunities. For example, a reduction in beds can save money, which can then be used to implement and develop an early supported discharge team or to establish nurse-led transient ischaemic attack clinics. However, the biggest and most important question should be: what will happen to my patients? How will they benefit?
There is always a battle for local services for local people, with the general public protesting against any potential closures or changes to their services. But, to me, the principle of right patient, right bed, right treatment will always outweigh the need for services to be local.
What in fact makes a service local? Is it a 10-minute, 20-minute or a one-hour commute? We all have an idea on the amount of time it is acceptable to travel for treatment. Now, think about that time in terms of the actual treatment you will receive.
Is 10 minutes to the nearest hospital that may or may not have the stroke services you require so important? Or is 30 minutes to the larger, neighbouring hospital that offers 24/7 access to hyper-acute stroke care including CT scans, thrombolysis and a bed on the acute stroke unit more acceptable? I need to know that, if I or one of my family have a stroke, that we will receive the best possible care and treatment. If that means a change in services to develop a centre of excellence, I know which outcome I’m backing.