Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 33,991 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Friday, April 17, 2026
"Like Having Family Nearby": An LLM-Powered Family-Resembling Avatar for offering Psychological Support and Training Guidance during Stroke Rehabilitatio
Monday, June 30, 2025
Early psychological therapy effective against depression and anxiety in stroke survivors: study
You don't need psychological therapy if you solve the primary problem by creating 100% recovery protocols! Needing this means you're a COMPLETE FAILURE AS A STROKE HOSPITAL! Are you that stupid you can't see the solution in front of your face?
Early psychological therapy effective against depression and anxiety in stroke survivors: study
Friday, June 6, 2025
A record-linkage study of post-stroke primary care psychological therapy effectiveness in England
You don't need psychological therapy if you solve the primary problem by creating 100% recovery protocols! Are you that stupid you can't see the solution in front of your face?
A record-linkage study of post-stroke primary care psychological therapy effectiveness in England
- Jae Won Suh,
- Vaughan Bell,
- Joshua E. J. Buckman,
- Céline El Baou,
- Roopal Desai,
- Caroline Fearn,
- Natalie L. Marchant,
- Marcus Richards,
- Claudia Cooper,
- Stephen Pilling,
- Amber John,
- Joshua Stott &
- Rob Saunders
Nature Mental Health (2025)Cite this article
42 Altmetric
Abstract
At least one-third of stroke survivors are affected by depression or anxiety, but no large-scale studies of real-world clinical practice have assessed whether psychological therapies are beneficial for these patients. Here we show that psychological treatment is effective for stroke survivors on average, using national healthcare records from National Health Service Talking Therapies services in England, including 7,597 patients with a hospital diagnosis of stroke before attendance. Following psychological treatment, stroke survivors experienced moderate reductions in depression and large reductions in anxiety symptoms. Patients who started attending the services a year or more after a stroke were less likely to reliably recover from symptoms of depression or anxiety than those seen within six months of a stroke, irrespective of differences in baseline characteristics including age, gender, local area deprivation and symptom severity. Compared with a matched sample of patients without a stroke, stroke survivors were less likely to reliably recover and more likely to reliably deteriorate after psychological treatment, although adjusting for level of physical comorbidity attenuated these relationships. It is crucial that clinicians working with stroke survivors screen for symptoms of depression and anxiety and consider referring patients to primary care psychological therapies as early as possible.
Thursday, January 2, 2025
Psychological Interventions to Improve Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction Post-stroke: A Scoping Review
You wouldn't need psychological interventions if you had 100% RECOVERY PROTOCOLS! Do the correct research: 100% recovery and you don't need to waste time on all these secondary problems because your survivor didn't get 100% recovered! Do you people have two functioning neurons to rub together?
My conclusion is you don't understand ONE GODDAMN THING ABOUT SURVIVOR MOTIVATION, DO YOU? You create EXACT 100% recovery protocols and your survivor will be motivated to do the millions of reps needed because they are looking forward to 100% recovery. GET THERE!
There would be no need for this useless research.
Psychological Interventions to Improve Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction Post-stroke: A Scoping Review
Published: January 02, 2025 >
DOI:
10.7759/cureus.76784
Cite this article as: Iwamoto Y, Imura T, Mitsutake T, et al. (January 02, 2025) Psychological Interventions to Improve Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction Post-stroke: A Scoping Review. Cureus 17(1): e76784. doi:10.7759/cureus.76784
Cognitive strategies in post-stroke patients significantly influence upper limb motor function recovery. Integrating upper extremity and psychological interventions may enhance rehabilitation outcomes. This scoping review aimed to summarize studies evaluating the effectiveness of combining these approaches to improve upper extremity motor dysfunction in patients with post-stroke syndrome. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing combined upper extremity and psychological interventions versus upper extremity interventions alone were included. Studies published between November 25, 2024, and the study’s conclusion were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Only English-language studies were reviewed. Three RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Two studies utilized cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP), while one employed cognitive-oriented strategy training augmented rehabilitation (COSTAR). The CO-OP studies demonstrated that combined psychological and physical interventions significantly improved motor function compared to physical interventions alone. However, the COSTAR-based study reported greater efficacy for upper extremity interventions alone. This review highlighted the mixed efficacy of combined interventions. While CO-OP showed potential benefits, the COSTAR findings suggest variability in the effectiveness of different cognitive strategies. Both approaches prioritized activity and goal setting rather than directly targeting motor recovery. Although the findings are inconclusive, this is the first review to explore the role of combined psychological and upper extremity interventions for post-stroke motor dysfunction, providing a foundation for further research.
Introduction & Background
Improving upper extremity motor dysfunction is crucial in post-stroke rehabilitation. Severe sequelae in the upper extremity affect 43%-69% of patients with post-stroke motor dysfunction [1,2]. Post-stroke upper extremity motor dysfunction limits activities of daily living [3] and social reintegration [4] and causes an economic burden [5]. Furthermore, post-stroke upper extremity dysfunction is correlated with anxiety, low quality of life, and a higher incidence of disability [6,7]. Only 5%-20% of patients achieve complete improvement in upper extremity motor dysfunction six months post-stroke despite the importance of improving upper extremity motor dysfunction [8,9]. Therefore, clinicians are required to select and provide patients with appropriate interventions to improve upper limb motor dysfunction.
Various upper limb interventions have improved upper limb motor dysfunction in stroke patients. Upper extremity motor dysfunction improvement, which requires sufficient physical activity and high-quality upper limb interventions, involves the basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex [10]. Upper limb interventions induce structural plasticity changes in the nervous system, which develops compensatory neural networks and improves motor dysfunction [11]. A previous guideline has determined constraint-induced movement therapy, electrical stimulation, and mirror therapy with a high evidence level to improve upper extremity motor dysfunction [12]. Therefore, interventions with a high evidence level aimed at enhancing upper limb motor dysfunction have already been determined.
Stroke patients often experience not only motor dysfunction but also mental status changes, such as post-stroke depression [13] and cerebrovascular dementia [14]. These mental status changes influence participation in rehabilitation and the overall recovery process [15-17]. Accordingly, it is hoped that improvements in mental state will lead to improvements in motor function and ADL, as well as improvements in the effectiveness of rehabilitation. Therefore, interventions addressing upper limb motor dysfunction also need to consider psychological aspects. Psychological interventions that use cognitive strategies have been recommended for improving skill transfer and subsequent functioning and participation [18-20]. Previous research on cognitive strategies has described them as goal-oriented, consciously controllable processes that facilitate or support performance as subjects develop internal procedures for them to perform desired skills [21]. Interventions using cognitive strategies have helped improve motor dysfunction [22,23]. However, evidence for psychological interventions to enhance post-stroke upper extremity motor dysfunction is inconsistent in previous guidelines [12]. Consistent evidence on psychological interventions remains lacking despite the importance of psychological interventions in improving motor dysfunction.
Previous systematic reviews revealed the effects of psychological interventions on improving mental health in patients with post-stroke syndrome, but not on improving motor dysfunction [24]. However, the usefulness of combining upper extremity interventions with psychological interventions for post-stroke upper extremity motor dysfunction remains unclear. Furthermore, various psychological intervention methods, including emotional [13], cognitive [25], motivation [26,27], planning and executing [28] aspects, are available, and summarizing the interventions that are effective when combined with upper extremity interventions is important. This scoping review aimed to comprehensively investigate and summarize the usefulness of a combination of upper extremity and psychological interventions for upper extremity motor dysfunction in stroke patients. Our overarching research questions were “Is it useful to combine upper extremity interventions with psychological interventions for upper extremity motor dysfunction post-stroke?” and “What psychological interventions are useful?”
More at link.
Wednesday, November 22, 2023
Psychological support after stroke: unmet needs and workforce requirements of clinical neuropsychological provision for optimal rehabilitation outcomes
Why are you working on this secondary problem? Solve the primary problem of 100% recovery and this problem magically goes away! Don't you people ever think?
Psychological support after stroke: unmet needs and workforce requirements of clinical neuropsychological provision for optimal rehabilitation outcomes
Abstract
Stroke services must detect and manage psychological and neuropsychological problems that occur after stroke, such as cognitive and language impairments, post-stroke apathy, post-stroke emotionalism, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, personality changes and suicidality. Stroke neuropsychology plays a key role in the assessment, understanding and management of these consequences of stroke, as well as contributing to complex case management, staff supervision and training. Where these provisions are absent from the stroke rehabilitation pathway, this significantly limits potential rehabilitation outcomes. To manage the scale of psychological and neuropsychological needs post stroke, clinical guidance recommends the use of a matched care system, in which these needs are triaged and matched with corresponding levels of support. Recent workforce guidelines provide clear professional recommendations for psychological staffing skill mix and threshold requirements for clinical oversight and clinical governance assurances.
Thursday, June 11, 2020
The role of rehabilitation psychology in stroke care described through case examples
You would need zero psychiatric or psychology care after stroke if you had 100% recovery protocols. Patients would be too busy doing and counting the reps needed to recover to even have any negative thoughts. Solve the correct problem, 100% recovery, not this secondary issue. Do you ever actually think about stroke?
The role of rehabilitation psychology in stroke care described through case examples
Neurorehabilitation , Volume 46(2) , Pgs. 195-204.NARIC Accession Number: J83614. What's this?
ISSN: 1053-8135.
Author(s): Perna, Robert ; Harik, Lindsey.
Publication Year: 2020.
Number of Pages: 10.
Abstract:
Article describe the role of rehabilitation psychology in treating common post-stroke complaints and, ultimately, optimizing post-stroke outcomes. Two case examples of individuals in post-acute stroke rehabilitation describe psychological issues that were negatively affecting outcomes and how they were managed. Given the abrupt and significant life-changing nature of stroke, it is often necessary to manage a diverse array of psychological issues that often cannot be simply managed via psychotropic medications. Psychological disturbances may affect rehabilitation outcomes through a reduction in adherence to home exercise programs, reduced energy level, increased fatigue, reduced frustration tolerance, and potentially less motivation and hope about the future. Understanding the patients’ emotional adjustment and issues can help them maximize their rehabilitation, recovery, and community integration. For the cases discussed, psychology consultations were central in helping optimize their rehabilitation and functional outcomes.(So you are making them feel better about not getting recovered? Good job.)
Descriptor Terms: ANXIETY DISORDERS, CASE STUDIES, DEPRESSION, INTERDISCIPLINARY ACTIVITIES, INTERVENTION, OUTCOMES, PSYCHOLOGY, REHABILITATION, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Get this Document: https://content.iospress.com/articles/neurorehabilitation/nre192970.
Citation: Perna, Robert , Harik, Lindsey. (2020). The role of rehabilitation psychology in stroke care described through case examples. Neurorehabilitation , 46(2), Pgs. 195-204. Retrieved 6/11/2020, from REHABDATA database.
Tuesday, September 17, 2019
Psychological factors after stroke: Are they stable over time?
Wrong focus. Stop focusing on secondary problems. Solve the primary problem, 100% recovery.
Psychological factors after stroke: Are they stable over time?
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (formerly the Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine) , Volume 51(1) , Pgs. 18-25.NARIC Accession Number: J81526. What's this?
ISSN: 1650-1977.
Author(s): Wijenberg, Melloney L. M.; Van Heugten, Caroline M.; Van Mierlo, Maria L.; Visser-Meily, Johanna M. A.; Post, Marcel W. M..
Publication Year: 2019.
Number of Pages: 8.
Abstract: Study followed 324 patients in the first 2 years after stroke to examine whether psychological factors are stable over time. The following psychological factors were assessed using self-report questionnaires at 2 months and at 2 years post-stroke: proactive coping, self-efficacy, extraversion, optimism, passive coping, neuroticism and pessimism. Changes over time, associations and dimensions among psychological factors were considered. Only passive coping scores showed no change between 2 months and 2 years post-stroke. Participants showed less proactive coping, lower self-efficacy, less extraversion, less optimism, more neuroticism and more pessimism over time. At both time-points, the psychological factors clustered into an “adaptive psychological factor” (proactive coping, self-efficacy, extraversion) and a “maladaptive psychological factor” (passive coping, neuroticism). Across all psychological factors, changes toward less-favorable outcomes were found. Clinicians should pay attention to adaptive and maladaptive psychological factors among stroke patients during long-term care.(Wrong, wrong, wrong. Get survivors 100% recovered and this problem goes away. Does no one in stroke have any brains at all?)
Descriptor Terms: LONGITUDINAL STUDIES, PERSONALITY, PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Get this Document: https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/abstract/10.2340/16501977-2688.
Citation: Wijenberg, Melloney L. M., Van Heugten, Caroline M., Van Mierlo, Maria L., Visser-Meily, Johanna M. A., Post, Marcel W. M.. (2019). Psychological factors after stroke: Are they stable over time?. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (formerly the Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine) , 51(1), Pgs. 18-25. Retrieved 9/17/2019, from REHABDATA database.
Sunday, January 22, 2017
Development and implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines for psychological interventions in post-stroke rehabilitation
You wouldn't need to solve psychological problems after stroke if you got them 100% recovered in a reasonable amount of time. Attack the true cause, not the side effects.
Development and implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines for psychological interventions in post-stroke rehabilitation
Abstract
Methods: In order to foster implementation of the recommendations, we incorporated the following steps: 1) in order to base the content on best available evidence, we conducted a systematic search for guidelines, reviews and literature, 2) we surveyed all neurological rehabilitation facilities in Germany for information on current structures and practices, and 3) we discussed a preliminary draft of the recommendations with national experts (psychologists, physicians, scientists, therapists for oc[removed]void(0);cupational, speech and physical therapy, nurses, patients). In addition, a sample of stroke patients was asked for their opinion on certain recommendations.
In a final step we then consulted psychologists and medical directors of all neurological rehabilitation centres (N=344 questionnaires; N=172 centers), and asked for their appraisal on each recommendation (approval, rejection, or alternate suggestions).
Findings: Response rate was 35% (n=121). We received 870 suggestions. Approval was 97% on average (range: 88-100%).
Conclusion: The broad participation of clinicians, scientists and patients allowed us to develop detailed recommendations based on current evidence and best practice. Now, evidence-based and widely accepted recommendations for psychological interventions in post-stroke rehabilitation are available.(Where the fuck is the protocol located?) We expect that their implementation will improve neurological rehabilitation.
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
7 Habits of Chronically Unhappy People
Is your psychologist from the hospital discussing stroke protocols with you to discover happiness?
I use Tiny Buddha. But never follow anything I do.
7 Habits of Chronically Unhappy People
Here are the 7 qualities of chronically unhappy people.
1. Your default belief is that life is hard.
2. You believe most people can't be trusted.
3. You concentrate on what's wrong in this world versus what's right.
4. You compare yourself to others and harbor jealousy.
5. You strive to control your life.
6. You consider your future with worry and fear.
7. You fill your conversations with gossip and complaints.
Details at link.
Friday, May 17, 2013
Effectiveness of psychological interventions in chronic stage of stroke: A systematic review
There is really no intervention that would help me right now unless it is a physical improvement.
But you might be different.
Effectiveness of psychological interventions in chronic stage of stroke: A systematic review
NARIC Accession Number: J65524. What's this?
ISSN: 1074-9357.
Author(s): Mehta, Swati; Pereira, Shelialah; Janzen, Shannon; McIntyre, Amanda; McClure, Andrew; Teasell, Robert W..
Publication Year: 2012.
Number of Pages: 9.
Abstract: Study examined the effectiveness of interventions for psychological issues faced by individuals post stroke when initiated in the chronic stage of stroke. MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Similar interventions were grouped and results summarized. Data on the study design, participant characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events were extracted from each of the selected studies. Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria. All 9 studies examined effectiveness on mood and 3 on adjustment. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation had the strongest evidence of effectiveness in improving mood followed by pharmacotherapy. Exercise appeared to be effective in improving adjustment and coping among individuals in the chronic stage of stroke. Overall, interventions provided in the chronic stage of stroke appear to be effective in improving mood and adjustment up to 3 months after intervention. The use of multidisciplinary interventions and acceptance models may be important in the overall adjustment process.
Descriptor Terms: CHRONIC ILLNESS, INTERVENTION, LITERATURE REVIEWS, OUTCOMES, PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service?: Y.