Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label 'monitor'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'monitor'. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

A Study to Estimate How Often Post-stroke Spasticity Occurs and to Provide a Standard Guideline on the Best Way to Monitor Its Development

 WOW! Crapola research; 'monitoring' NOT CURING SPASTICITY! And it's a useless observational trial. I'd fire everyone involved!

A Study to Estimate How Often Post-stroke Spasticity Occurs and to Provide a Standard Guideline on the Best Way to Monitor Its Development

ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT06055725
SponsorIpsen
Information Provided byIpsen Medical Director
Study Start (Actual)2023-11-01
Primary Completion (Estimated) 2027-11-30
Study Completion (Estimated)2027-11-30
Enrollment (Estimated)1058
Study TypeObservational
Last Update Posted2026-05-01

Brief Summary

This study will monitor patients during the first year following their stroke. Stroke is a very serious condition where there is a sudden interruption of blood flow in the brain. The main aim of the study will be to find out how many of those who experience their first-ever stroke then go on to develop spasticity that would benefit from treatment with medication. Spasticity is a common post-stroke condition that causes stiff or ridged muscles. The results of this study will provide a standard guideline on the best way to monitor the development of post-stroke spasticity.

Sunday, May 10, 2026

Validity of FuncUseRatio for ecological monitoring of functional arm use after stroke: toward precision neurorehabilitation

 Since you DID NOTHING to map EXACT recovery protocols to the deficits found; COMPLETELY FUCKING USELESS RESEARCH! You're fired! 

Comeuppance is going to be a real bitch for you when you are the 1 in 4 per WHO that has a stroke!

Validity of FuncUseRatio for ecological monitoring of functional arm use after stroke: toward precision neurorehabilitation

    We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

    Abstract

    Background

    The use of the paretic arm in activities of daily living after stroke is critical to prevent further decline in function over time. Accelerometers offer the opportunity to monitor arm activity during real-life daily activities in home environments. However, commonly used accelerometric metrics may be influenced by passive movements unrelated to functional arm use. In this study, we evaluate the validity of FuncUseRatio for monitoring activities of daily living after stroke.

    Methods

    Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 enrolled 23 healthy participants who performed 22 arm functional movements representative of activities of daily living. Movements of both arms were simultaneously recorded using wrist-worn accelerometers and a Vicon motion capture system allowing a direct comparison between accelerometer-derived forearm orientation and Vicon measurements (gold standard). Experiment 2 included 25 individuals after stroke who performed ecological activities (meal preparation, eating, and dressing). Arm movements were recorded using accelerometers and synchronized video analysis (ground truth), enabling comparison between accelerometer-derived FuncUseRatio and structured video-based arm-use computation.

    Results

    In Experiment 1, forearm orientation estimated from accelerometer data showed excellent consistency with Vicon measurements under dynamic conditions required for FuncUse computation. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were ICC(C,1) = 0.92 (95% CI 0.82–0.96, p < 0.01) for the right forearm and ICC(C,1) = 0.94 (95% CI 0.86–0.97, p < 0.01) for the left forearm, confirming strong agreement between the two systems. In Experiment 2, FuncUseRatio derived from accelerometer data demonstrated excellent agreement with the structured video-based analysis ratio, considered the ground truth, with (ICC(A,1) = 0.96, 95% CI 0.90–0.98, p < 0.01).

    Conclusion

    The FuncUseRatio is a valid measure for assessing functional arm use during activities of daily living in ecologically relevant settings. Its implementation may enable early detection of reduced paretic arm use, including when the patient is at home, facilitate timely reassessment to understand its underlying causes, and thereby allow the implementation of specific arm rehabilitation strategies before any decline in function or participation occurs.

    Monday, September 1, 2025

    A Study to Estimate How Often Post-stroke Spasticity Occurs and to Provide a Standard Guideline on the Best Way to Monitor Its Development

    WHAT ABSOLUTE FUCKING STUPIDITY! 'Monitoring' spasticity rather than curing it!  YOU'RE ALL FIRED FOR EXTREME INCOMPETENCE!

    You don't know about this earlier research? 
  • 30% get spasticity (28 posts to March 2016)
  • Proving your absolute incompetence?
    A Study to Estimate How Often Post-stroke Spasticity Occurs and to Provide a Standard Guideline on the Best Way to Monitor Its Development

    ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06055725
     Sponsor Ipsen Information Provided by Ipsen Medical Director Study Start (Actual)2023-11-01 Primary Completion (Estimated) 2027-11-03 Study Completion (Estimated)2027-11-30 Enrollment (Estimated) 1051 Study Type Observational Last Update Posted2025-08-27 

    Brief Summary

    This study will monitor patients during the first year following their stroke. Stroke is a very serious condition where there is a sudden interruption of blood flow in the brain. The main aim of the study will be to find out how many of those who experience their first-ever stroke then go on to develop spasticity that would benefit from treatment with medication. Spasticity is a common post-stroke condition that causes stiff or ridged muscles. The results of this study will provide a standard guideline on the best way to monitor the development of post-stroke spasticity.

    Tuesday, August 5, 2025

    A Study to Estimate How Often Post-stroke Spasticity Occurs and to Provide a Standard Guideline on the Best Way to Monitor Its Development

     

    For FUCKING STUPIDITY'S SAKE!  Monitoring DOES NOTHING FOR RECOVERY! 

    I'd have all of you fired for extreme stupidity!

    Send me personal hate mail on this: oc1dean@gmail.com. I'll print your complete statement with your name and my response in my blog. Or are you afraid to engage with my stroke-addled mind? No excuses are allowed! You're medically trained; it should be simple to precisely state EXACTLY HOW monitoring gets spasticity cured with NO EXCUSES! Your definition of competence in stroke is obviously much lower than stroke survivors' definition of your competence! Swearing at me is allowed, I'll return the favor. Don't even attempt to use the excuse that brain research is hard.

    Have you ever thought' 'Just maybe survivors want spasticity cured?' Or doesn't that even compute?

    A Study to Estimate How Often Post-stroke Spasticity Occurs and to Provide a Standard Guideline on the Best Way to Monitor Its DevelopmentClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT06055725

    ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT06055725

    SponsorIpsen

    Information Provided byIpsen Medical Director

    Study Start (Actual)2023-11-01

    Primary Completion (Estimated) 2027-11-03

    Study Completion (Estimated)2027-11-30

    Enrollment (Estimated)1051

    Study TypeObservational

    Last Update Posted2025-07-30

    Last Update Posted2025-07-30

    Study Overview

    Brief Summary

    This study will monitor patients during the first year following their stroke. Stroke is a very serious condition where there is a sudden interruption of blood flow in the brain. The main aim of the study will be to find out how many of those who experience their first-ever stroke then go on to develop spasticity that would benefit from treatment with medication. Spasticity is a common post-stroke condition that causes stiff or ridged muscles. The results of this study will provide a standard guideline on the best way to monitor the development of post-stroke spasticity.ClinicalTrials.gov