Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label so what?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label so what?. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

Stroke Clot Composition Linked to Functional Outcomes, Death

So what?  Your doctors and stroke hospital will do no followup to solve this problem.

Stroke Clot Composition Linked to Functional Outcomes, Death

Study hints at personalized treatment potential

The relative composition of ischemic stroke clots was associated with mortality and disability prognosis, according to a large study.

Those who had clots rich in red blood cells (RBCs) had better outcomes, while platelet content contributed to greater risk, reported Raul G. Nogueira, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh, during the American Stroke Association's International Stroke Conference (ISC), held virtually and in person in New Orleans.

For each 10% increase in RBC content of a clot, the odds ratio of functional independence at 90 days after a stroke (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 or return to baseline function) rose a relative 18% and the odds of death fell 16%, both statistically significant.

For each 10% higher platelet content in the clot, the unadjusted odds of such a good neurologic outcome fell by a relative 11% and odds of mortality rose 16%, again both significant.

While RBC content has long been tied to softer clots easier to remove with endovascular therapy, the role of platelets has been "somewhat neglected," Nogueira noted at an ISC press conference.

Still, "they have the potential to modify the mechanical properties of the clot and therefore affect the outcomes after thrombectomy," he said. "Also, the more erythrocytic components you have, the more friable the clot is, so it has a higher tendency to break apart and cause distal embolization."

Indeed, in the study, platelet composition appeared to modify the advantage of an RBC-rich clot, with significant interaction terms. Good functional outcome at 90 days was seen in 62.8% of patients with RBC-rich, platelet-poor clots, and 50.8% of those with RBC-rich, platelet-rich clots (P=0.052). Mortality at 90 days occurred in 10.0% and 18.8%, respectively (P=0.045).

The study utilized clot samples retrieved as part of the observational EXCELLENT registry for first-line, real-world use of the EmboTrap thrombectomy device in an "all-comer" population. Of the 36 participating centers, 25 collected clots for immunohistological and MSB staining analysis, yielding 543 for analysis at central laboratories in the U.S. and Europe.

RBC-rich clots were defined as those with more than 45% RBCs, which were then subdivided into those with more than the median 30.7% platelet composition, deemed platelet rich, and those with a platelet-to-fibrin ratio at or below the median 1.52, considered low in fibrin. The samples were fairly evenly divided among the subtypes.

Fibrin content wasn't a significant factor in mortality and functional outcomes, nor was there a significant interaction of platelet contribution to RBC-poor clots.

"These nuances are important," commented ISC program vice-chair Tudor G. Jovin, MD, of the Cooper Neurological Institute in Camden, New Jersey, at the press conference.

The next step for research is to identify clot composition, not histologically after removal, but through imaging, biomarkers, or some other means before thrombectomy, he suggested. "This study is getting us a step closer to this paradigm of individualized medicine where we figure out before the clot is removed what the essential component of the clot composition is, so that we can tailor treatments accordingly."

Analyses accounting for other variables, such as anticoagulation use by the patient and calcification in the clot, are ongoing, Nogueira noted.

Conference program chair Louise McCullough, MD, PhD, of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, pointed to other results presented at the conference showing benefits from adding intra-arterial thrombolytics after complete revascularization with thrombectomy.

If we could quickly determine if a clot is RBC-rich right in the interventional suite, "it may be we could stratify who would benefit," she said during the press conference that she moderated.

It's possible that high-RBC clots, which are more prone to embolization, could benefit even more from this type of "cleaning-up approach," Nogueira agreed.

Other potential personalization would be to give an intra-arterial antiplatelet for platelet-rich clots compared with adjunctive tissue plasminogen activator, McCullough told MedPage Today.

Another key question that clot composition could potentially answer in the future is how to prevent subsequent strokes, commented Tapan Mehta, MD, MPH, of the Ayer Neuroscience Institute at Hartford Hospital in Connecticut, who has also researched clot composition.

Looking for the source of the clot after the fact -- whether carotid artery or cardiac emboli -- is the best clinicians can do now, he told MedPage Today. "But if somehow we could correlate the red blood cell, fibrin, and platelet content consistently to the origin of the clot, that would be a huge help ... because we can change the type of prophylactic medication we use: whether we use aspirin, whether we use Coumadin [warfarin], or whether we use one of the newer anticoagulants."

Disclosures

The EXCELLENT registry was sponsored by Cerenovus.

Nogueira disclosed consulting fees for advisory roles with Anaconda, Biogen, Cerenovus, Genentech, Hybernia, Imperative Care, Medtronic, Phenox, Philips, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Stryker Neurovascular, Shanghai Wallaby, and Synchron, as well as stock options for advisory roles with Astrocyte, Brainomix, Cerebrotech, Ceretrieve, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Vesalio, Viz-AI, RapidPulse, and Perfuze.

 

Saturday, May 18, 2019

UCI Medical Center for Neurology uses video games to help stroke patients

So what? Have they evaluated all these other video games and chosen the best? I prefer the cockroach stomping game.  

UCI Medical Center for Neurology uses video games to help stroke patients

Video at link.

The neurology department at University of California, Irvine has unveiled an ongoing clinical trial that uses video games to help stroke patients rehabilitate.










IRVINE, Calif. (KABC) -- The neurology department at University of California, Irvine has unveiled an ongoing clinical trial that uses video games to help stroke patients rehabilitate.

Kevin Irish just finished a 12-week trial using the new therapy.

"Fun, and it was a great way to... help me be accountable to do my exercises everyday," said Irish.

One year ago, Irish had a stroke. His whole right side was paralyzed. He struggled to learn how to walk again and to use his right arm. When he was approached about the clinical trial through the neurology department, he signed up right away.

"Six weeks of aggressive arm rehab produce substantial gains that are equivalent whether you're in the clinic or getting it at home," said Dr. Steven C. Cramer, UCI professor of neurology.

Cramer and his team created a gaming system that is delivered to a patient's home. It uses different attachments and interactions to ensure patients are completing their therapy at home. Doctors are also able to use video conferencing to check on their patients. Using games like Blackjack, Duck Hunt and others, the team found stroke patients improved their motor skills and were able to do so in the comfort of their own homes.

"We sit together, a group of us, occupational therapists, physical therapists, neurologists, programmers, gamers, and we ask how can we get people to move more, do more rehab, get better," said Cramer.

Since the start of the trial, Irish's walking has improved as well as his use of his right arm. He hopes others seek out innovative rehabilitation like this.

"I'm always looking for something that's going to help me get better," said Irish. "I'm a long way away from where I'd like to be, but I've come a long way as well."

Cramer hopes to expand the trial to include longer time frames and other therapies

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Relationship between hand grip strength and functional capacity after stroke

So what? No protocols to increase hand grip strength.
http://search.naric.com/research/rehab/redesign_record.cfm?search=2&type=all&criteria=I243588&phrase=no&rec=243588&article_source=CIRRIE&international=1&international_language=&international_location=
Relação entre a força de preensão manual e capacidade funcional após Acidente Vascular Cerebral.  Revista Neurociências , Volume 23(1) , Pgs. 74-80.

NARIC Accession Number: I243588.  What's this?
Author(s): Soraia Micaela Silva; João Carlos Ferrari Corrêa; Camila Da Silva Braga; Fernanda Ishida Corrêa.
Publication Year: 2015.
Abstract: The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between grip strength (GS) and functional capacity following post stroke sequelae. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 35 individuals with chronic hemiparesis following a stroke. Handgrip strength was evaluated, along with sensorimotor recovery with the Fugl-Meyer scale, the degree of functional independence in motor activities with the Functional Independence Measure, and the functional mobility with the Timed Up and Go test. For statistical analysis, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used. There was a positive and strong correlation between the GS and motor sensory-recovery (r=0.7; p=0.001), and a negative and moderate correlation between the GS and functional mobility (r =-0.4; p=0.02). However, there was no significant correlation between the GS and functional independence (r =0.3; p=0.11). Based on these analyses, it can be inferred that in this population, the GS is a strong indicator of sensory-motor recovery after stroke, and a moderate indicator of functional mobility.
Descriptor Terms: Functional capacity, Hemiplegia, Muscles, Stroke.
Language: Portuguese
Geographic Location(s): Brazil, South America.

Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Request Information.
Get this Document: http://www.revistaneurociencias.com.br/edicoes/2015/2301/original/986original.pdf.

Citation: Soraia Micaela Silva, João Carlos Ferrari Corrêa, Camila Da Silva Braga, Fernanda Ishida Corrêa. (2015). Relationship between hand grip strength and functional capacity after stroke.  Relação entre a força de preensão manual e capacidade funcional após Acidente Vascular Cerebral.  Revista Neurociências , 23(1), Pgs. 74-80. Retrieved 10/11/2017, from REHABDATA database.

Saturday, September 17, 2016

Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Hand Dexterity in Chronic Hemiparesis: A Randomized Trial

So what if it does? Useless without a protocol being written for it. Does no one ever think of the survivors?
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/strokeaha/early/2016/09/08/STROKEAHA.116.013791.full.pdf
1
N
euromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the paretic wrist and finger extensors is routinely used in
stroke rehabilitation to promote recovery of muscle strength and upper extremity function. A recent review of 31 randomized controlled trials concluded that there is strong evidence that NMES applied in the context of task practice improves upper extremity function in subacute and chronic stroke.
1
This is corroborated by a recent systematic review with meta-analysis that concluded that functional electrical stimulation improves activity compared with training alone.
2
Cyclic NMES (cNMES) is a commonly used and widely available method of administering NMES in stroke rehabilitation.
3
With cNMES, stimulation is delivered according to an on–off cycle, with the cycle timing, repetitions, and intensity of stimulation set by the therapist. Thus, cNMES requires no active participation from the patient, and because the patient does not control the timing or intensity of stimulation,
cNMES is not easily used to assist functional task practice (FTP). Nevertheless, several studies have shown that cNMES can reduce upper limb motor impairment compared with control groups
4,5
although the longevity of effect is inconsistent across studies.
6
Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) is a new NMES modality that enables the patient to actively open their paretic hand and perform functional tasks. With CCFES, the patient controls the stimulation to their paretic hand in real-time by opening and closing their strong hand. An instrumented glove worn on the strong hand modulates the stimulation intensity to the paretic hand extensors so that both hands open synchronously (Figure I in the online-only Data Supplement
).
7
CCFES may be more effective than cNMES because the stimulation is intention driven; the patient
Background and Purpose
It is unknown whether one method of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for poststroke
upper limb rehabilitation is more effective than another. Our aim was to compare the effects of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) with cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (cNMES).
Methods
Stroke patients with chronic (>6 months) moderate to severe upper extremity hemiparesis (n=80) were randomized to receive 10 sessions/wk of CCFES- or cNMES-assisted hand opening exercise at home plus 20 sessions of functional task practice in the laboratory for 12 weeks. The task practice for the CCFES group was stimulation assisted. The primary outcome was change in Box and Block Test (BBT) score at 6 months post treatment. Upper extremity Fugl–Meyer and
Arm Motor Abilities Test were also measured.
Results
At 6 months post treatment, the CCFES group had greater improvement on the BBT, 4.6 (95% confidence interval
[CI], 2.2–7.0), than the cNMES group, 1.8 (95% CI, 0.6–3.0), between-group difference of 2.8 (95% CI, 0.1–5.5),
P
=0.045. No significant between-group difference was found for the upper extremity Fugl–Meyer (P
=0.888) or Arm Motor Abilities Test (P=0.096). Participants who had the largest improvements on BBT were <2 years post stroke with moderate (ie, not severe) hand impairment at baseline. Among these, the 6-month post-treatment BBT gains of the CCFES group, 9.6 (95% CI, 5.6–13.6), were greater than those of the cNMES group, 4.1 (95% CI, 1.7–6.5), between-group difference of 5.5 (95% CI, 0.8–10.2), P=0.023.
Conclusions
CCFES improved hand dexterity more than cNMES in chronic stroke survivors.
Clinical Trial Registration
URL:
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov
. Unique identifier: NCT00891319.
(
Stroke
. 2016;47:00-00. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013791.)
Key