Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, July 15, 2023

Social Isolation Tied to Brain Volume in Older Adults

 

Well, the solution to this is 100% recovery before you lose the first two groups of friends as described by Aristotle.  Your doctor's responsibility.

Aristotle believes that there are three different kinds of friendship; that of utility, friendship of pleasure, and virtuous friendship. 

The latest here:

Social Isolation Tied to Brain Volume in Older Adults

Relationship between brain atrophy and social contact may be "a vicious cycle"

A photo of a senior woman sitting on her couch.

Frequency of social contact was tied to brain volume in cognitively normal older adults, a cross-sectional study in Japan showed.

Total brain volume was smaller in people who had the lowest frequency of social contact versus those with the highest frequency (67.3% vs 67.8%), reported Toshiharu Ninomiya, MD, of Kyushu University in Fukuoka, and co-authors in Neurologyopens in a new tab or window.

Less social contact was linked with smaller temporal lobe, occipital lobe, cingulum, hippocampus, and amygdala volumes. White matter lesion volume increased with fewer social interactions, from 0.26% in the most social group to 0.30% in the least.

Relationships between social contact and brain volumes appeared to be partly mediated by depressive symptoms, "which could be a potential mechanism underlying the link between social isolation and cognitive function or dementia," the researchers said.

The findings are in line with recent data from the Framingham Studyopens in a new tab or window, which found that dementia incidence tripled in lonely older adults who otherwise were expected to have relatively low risk. A longitudinal analysis of U.K. Biobankopens in a new tab or window participants also linked social isolation with lower brain volume and a higher risk of subsequent dementia.

Loneliness and social isolation are serious public health risks, especially in older adults, noted Alexa Walter, PhD, and Danielle Sandsmark, MD, PhD, both of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, in an accompanying editorialopens in a new tab or window.

"A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine reportopens in a new tab or window found that more than one-fourth of adults [over] 65 years are socially isolated," Walter and Sandsmark wrote. "Social isolation has been associated with a variety of negative health outcomes including premature mortality, increased risk of coronary heart disease and stroke, increased reporting of depressive symptoms, as well as increased dementia risk and cognitive decline."

Ninomiya and co-authors evaluated MRI and survey data from 8,896 dementia-free participants in the ongoing Japan Prospective Studies Collaboration for Aging and Dementia (JPSC-ADopens in a new tab or window). Women comprised 57% of the study group, which had a mean age of 73.

Participants rated their frequency of social contact as every day, several times a week, several times a month, or seldom. They answered questions about depression, educational level, marital status, living situation, and occupation. The survey also asked about regular medications including antihypertensive or antidiabetic drugs, medical history, smoking, and exercise.

Cognitive function was higher in participants who had daily social contact compared with those who had the least contact (28 vs 27 on the Mini-Mental State Examination; scores between 25 and 30 are considered normal). Depressive symptoms were lower in the daily-contact group compared with the seldom-contact group (P<0.001).

Less social contact also was associated with lower education, unemployment, hypertension, smoking, alcohol use, and a history of cardiovascular disease.

Mediation analysis suggested that 15% to 29% of the associations between frequency of social contact and each brain volume were mediated by depressive symptoms. The direct effects of social contact frequency on brain volumes ranged from 71% to 85%, the model hypothesized.

Several mechanisms may explain the link between low social contact and brain atrophy, Ninomiya and colleagues noted. "[S]ocially isolated individuals were more prone to have diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and unhealthy lifestyles, including smoking and physical inactivity," they observed.

Decreased cognitive stimulation due to less social contact may cause brain atrophy, the researchers suggested. Fewer social interactions also could be an early symptom of structural brain changes like atrophy or white matter lesions, they pointed out.

"Since the present analysis had a cross-sectional design, causal interpretations of the association between low frequency of social contact and brain atrophy should be avoided," Ninomiya and co-authors cautioned.

"Rather, it is expected that the relationship between low frequency of social contact and brain atrophy may be bidirectional, with a vicious cycle existing between social isolation, brain atrophy, and cognitive function decline," they noted.

The analysis had other limitations, the researchers acknowledged. The survey did not collect information about loneliness, and findings may not apply to younger populations.

Disclosures

This study was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development and Suntory Holdings Limited.

Ninomiya reported receiving grants from Suntory Holdings. Co-authors had nothing to disclose.

The editorialists reported no relevant disclosures.

Primary Source

Neurology

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowHirabayashi N, et al "Association between frequency of social contact and brain atrophy in community-dwelling older people without dementia: The JPSC-AD study" Neurology 2023; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207602.

Secondary Source

Neurology

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowWalter AE, Sandsmark D "The importance of social contact on brain atrophy among older individuals" Neurology 2023; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207720.

No comments:

Post a Comment