You do realize that the actual goal is to prevent depression? And the way to do that is EXACT 100% RECOVERY PROTOCOLS. Your patient will be too busy counting reps and looking forward to recovery to get depressed. We've known for years that survivors get depressed and you blithering idiots are doing nothing to prevent depression.
Solve the primary problem of 100% recovery and you don't have to work on the secondary problem of depression.
33% survivor depression (26 posts to September 2016)
Psychometric comparisons of three depression measures for patients with stroke
American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) , Volume 76(4) , Pgs. 7604205140.
NARIC Accession Number: J89991. What's this?
ISSN: 0272-9490.
Author(s): Chiu, En-Chi; Chen, Yi-Ju; Wu, Wen-Chi; Chou, Chiung-Xia; Yu, Min-Yuan.
Publication Year: 2022.
Number of Pages: 6.
Abstract: Study compared the reliability and validity of three depression measures in a sample of patients with stroke: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES–D), Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI–II), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Fifty-nine outpatients in southern Taiwan completed the three depression measures. Cronbach’s alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to examine the internal consistency and test–retest reliability, respectively, of the three measures. An independent-samples t test was conducted to compare two groups of patients with different levels of disability to investigate discriminative validity. Pearson correlations were calculated among the three measures to examine concurrent validity. The three measures had good internal consistency (α = .85–.92) and sufficient test–retest reliability (ICC = .84–.91). The minimal detectable change (percentage of minimal detectable change) was 10.6 (63.3 percent), 13.5 (98.3 percent), and 5.8 (49.9 percent) for the CES–D, BDI–II, and GDS, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in CES–D score (and no significant differences on the other two measures. The correlations among the three measures ranged from .79 to .89. All three depression measures had sound internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity in patients with stroke. Of the three measures, the CES–D had better discriminative validity, and the GDS demonstrated greater reliability and smaller random measurement error in patients with stroke.
Descriptor Terms: DEPRESSION, MEASUREMENTS, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, OUTCOMES, PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Chiu, En-Chi, Chen, Yi-Ju, Wu, Wen-Chi, Chou, Chiung-Xia, Yu, Min-Yuan. (2022). Psychometric comparisons of three depression measures for patients with stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) , 76(4), Pgs. 7604205140. Retrieved 10/25/2022, from REHABDATA database.
NARIC Accession Number: J89991. What's this?
ISSN: 0272-9490.
Author(s): Chiu, En-Chi; Chen, Yi-Ju; Wu, Wen-Chi; Chou, Chiung-Xia; Yu, Min-Yuan.
Publication Year: 2022.
Number of Pages: 6.
Abstract: Study compared the reliability and validity of three depression measures in a sample of patients with stroke: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES–D), Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI–II), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Fifty-nine outpatients in southern Taiwan completed the three depression measures. Cronbach’s alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to examine the internal consistency and test–retest reliability, respectively, of the three measures. An independent-samples t test was conducted to compare two groups of patients with different levels of disability to investigate discriminative validity. Pearson correlations were calculated among the three measures to examine concurrent validity. The three measures had good internal consistency (α = .85–.92) and sufficient test–retest reliability (ICC = .84–.91). The minimal detectable change (percentage of minimal detectable change) was 10.6 (63.3 percent), 13.5 (98.3 percent), and 5.8 (49.9 percent) for the CES–D, BDI–II, and GDS, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in CES–D score (and no significant differences on the other two measures. The correlations among the three measures ranged from .79 to .89. All three depression measures had sound internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity in patients with stroke. Of the three measures, the CES–D had better discriminative validity, and the GDS demonstrated greater reliability and smaller random measurement error in patients with stroke.
Descriptor Terms: DEPRESSION, MEASUREMENTS, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, OUTCOMES, PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Chiu, En-Chi, Chen, Yi-Ju, Wu, Wen-Chi, Chou, Chiung-Xia, Yu, Min-Yuan. (2022). Psychometric comparisons of three depression measures for patients with stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) , 76(4), Pgs. 7604205140. Retrieved 10/25/2022, from REHABDATA database.
No comments:
Post a Comment