http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166242
- Remedios López-Liria,
- Francisco Antonio Vega-Ramírez,
- Patricia Rocamora-Pérez,
- José Manuel Aguilar-Parra,
- David Padilla-Góngora
x
- Published: November 11, 2016
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166242
Objective
To
compare home-based rehabilitation (RITH) and standard outpatient rehabilitation
in a hospital setting, in terms of improving the functional recovery and
quality of life of stroke patients.
Study Design and Setting
This
was a prospective cohort study in Andalusia (Spain).
Participants
One
hundred and forty-five patients completed the outcome data.
Measures
Daily
activities were measured by the Barthel index, Canadian Neurological Scale (to
assess mental state), Tinetti scale (balance and gait), and Short Form Health
Survey-36 (SF-36 to compare the quality of life).
Results
No
statistically significant differences were found between the two groups
regarding the clinical characteristics of patients in the initial measurement,
except for age and mental state (younger and with greater neurological
impairment in the hospital group). After physical therapy, both groups showed
statistically significant improvements from baseline in each of the measures.
These improvements were better in RITH patients than in the hospital patients
on all functionality scales with a smaller number of sessions.
Conclusions
Home rehabilitation is at
least as effective as the outpatient rehabilitation programs in a hospital
setting, in terms of recovery of functionality in post-stroke patients. Overall
quality of life is severely impaired in both groups, as stroke is a very
disabling disease that radically affects patients’ lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment