Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label tactile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tactile. Show all posts

Sunday, June 9, 2024

A scoping review on examination approaches for identifying tactile deficits at the upper extremity in individuals with stroke

 Unless EXACT 100% REHAB PROTOCOLS follow this, this is totally worthless for survivors needing recovery! Do you people have two functioning neurons to rub together?

A scoping review on examination approaches for identifying tactile deficits at the upper extremity in individuals with stroke

Abstract

Purpose

Accurate perception of tactile stimuli is essential for performing and learning activities of daily living. Through this scoping review, we sought to summarize existing examination approaches for identifying tactile deficits at the upper extremity in individuals with stroke. The goal was to identify current limitations and future research needs for designing more comprehensive examination tools.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework and the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A database search for tactile examination approaches at the upper extremity of individuals with stroke was conducted using Medline (Ovid), The Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL Plus with Full Text (Ebsco), Scopus (Elsevier), PsycInfo (Ebsco), and Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global. Original research and review articles that involved adults (18 years or older) with stroke, and performed tactile examinations at the upper extremity were eligible for inclusion. Data items extracted from the selected articles included: if the examination was behavioral in nature and involved neuroimaging, the extent to which the arm participated during the examination, the number of possible outcomes of the examination, the type(s) of tactile stimulation equipment used, the location(s) along the arm examined, the peripheral nerves targeted for examination, and if any comparison was made with the non-paretic arm or with the arms of individuals who are neurotypical.

Results

Twenty-two articles met the inclusion criteria and were accepted in this review. Most examination approaches were behavioral in nature and involved self-reporting of whether a tactile stimulus was felt while the arm remained passive (i.e., no volitional muscle activity). Typically, the number of possible outcomes with these behavioral approaches were limited (2-3), whereas the neuroimaging approaches had many more possible outcomes (

). Tactile examinations were conducted mostly at the distal locations along the arm (finger or hand) without targeting any specific peripheral nerve. Although a majority of articles compared paretic and non-paretic arms, most did not compare outcomes to a control group of individuals who are neurotypical.

Discussion

Our findings noted that most upper extremity tactile examinations are behavioral approaches, which are subjective in nature, lack adequate resolution, and are insufficient to identify the underlying neural mechanisms of tactile deficits. Also, most examinations are administered at distal locations of the upper extremity when the examinee’s arm is relaxed (passive). Further research is needed to develop better tactile examination tools that combine behavioral responses and neurophysiological outcomes, and allow volitional tactile exploration. Approaches that include testing of multiple body locations/nerves along the upper extremity, provide higher resolution of outcomes, and consider normative comparisons with individuals who are neurotypical may provide a more comprehensive understanding of the tactile deficits occurring following a stroke.

Friday, August 11, 2023

Tactile imagery used to improve rehabilitation of patients with motor disorders

Ask your doctor EXACTLY HOW this can be used to recover from your stroke. No answer, you don't have a functioning stroke doctor.

Tactile imagery used to improve rehabilitation of patients with motor disorders

Brain MRI projection. Credit: Skoltech

Skoltech researchers in collaboration with Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Lomonosov Moscow State University, and Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences demonstrated that sensorimotor regions of the brain can be activated not only through movement, but also tactile imagery. The results are presented in the eNeuro journal.

For rehabilitation of patients after a stroke, trauma, or amputation, researchers employ imagination, which results in physical changes in the human body. For the treatment, patients mentally practice difficult movements—in sport, dance, or while playing musical instruments. This "training" allows rebuilding of through the , including the ability to move for patients with artificial limbs.

Mental imagery is extensively studied in the context of visual images, which helped create a "model" of how it works. "Imagination is a reverse process of sensory perception. First, the is consciously extracted from the memory. Then, it leads to the activation of primary sensory areas. But the model has to be proven with data obtained from other areas—not only sensory, but also tactile, for example," says the leading author, Senior Research Scientist from the Neuro Center Lev Yakovlev.

The study involved 20 who learned how to imagine . Researchers applied vibrostimulation to the patients' skin and asked them to remember the feelings in order to recreate them mentally later. After several procedures, the power of vibration was reduced and the participants were asked to mentally compensate for the lack of sensations.

"When volunteers completed the training, they had to imagine vibration on their arm for 6 seconds, without any stimulation. They succeeded in it, and while they were imagining, we recorded a special reaction of desynchronization in the μ-rhythm of the electroencephalogram, which showed the activation of brain areas responsible for tactile sensations," says Yakovlev.

According to researchers, they used a small number of EEG channels, so it was difficult to determine the exact location of activity sources. Now, the research team will focus on the next stage, which will employ high-density EEG—128 channels—and individual brain scans of the participants obtained through MRI. In doing so, scientists will localize sources of electrical activity related to the tactile imagery process.

"To date, rehabilitation of motor disorders is based on training motor regions of the cortex. It is reasonable—if the ability to move is lost, we have to train those regions which are responsible for it. However, motor areas are closely linked to somatosensory ones, which among other things deal with tactile sense. So, tactile sensations play an important role in the movement regulation.

"The idea of our research is that with the help of tactile imagery we can train not only the brain cortex, but also somatosensory. It can improve neurological rehabilitation of patients," adds Yakovlev.

More information: Lev Yakovlev et al, Event-Related Desynchronization Induced by Tactile Imagery: an EEG Study, eNeuro (2023). DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0455-22.2023 

Journal information: eNeuro




Thursday, August 11, 2022

Tactile Sensation Improves Following Motor Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: The VIGoROUS Randomized Controlled Trial

Margaret Yekutiel wrote a whole book about this in 2001, 'Sensory Re-Education of the Hand After Stroke'. And 21 years later you repeated the same thing? What a waste and indication how out-of-date you are.

Tactile Sensation Improves Following Motor Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: The VIGoROUS Randomized Controlled Trial

First Published June 11, 2022 Research Article Find in PubMed 

Background. 

Up to 85% of people with chronic stroke experience somatosensory impairment, which contributes to poor sensorimotor control and non-use of the affected limb. Neurophysiological mechanisms suggest motor rehabilitation may improve tactile sense post-stroke, however, somatosensory recovery has rarely been reported in controlled trials.  

Objective. 

To compare the effect of four upper limb motor rehabilitation programs on the recovery of tactile sensation in adults with chronic stroke.  

Methods. 

Adults with chronic stroke and mild or moderate upper extremity hemiparesis (n = 167) were enrolled in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Participants completed three weeks of gaming therapy, gaming therapy with additional telerehabilition, Constraint-Induced Movement therapy, or traditional rehabilitation. Here, we report the results of a secondary outcome, tactile sensation, measured with monofilaments, before and after treatment, and 6 months later.  

Results. 

A mixed-effects general linear model revealed similar positive change in tactile sensitivity regardless of the type of training. On average, participants were able to detect a stimulus that was 32% and 33% less after training and at 6-month follow-up, respectively. One-third of participants experienced recategorization of their level of somatosensory impairment (e.g., regained protective sensation) following training. Poorer tactile sensation at baseline was associated with greater change. Conclusions. About one-third of individuals with mild/moderate chronic hemiparesis experience sustained improvements in tactile sensation following motor rehabilitation, regardless of the extent of tactile input in the rehabilitation program. Potential for sensory improvement is an additional motivator for those post-stroke. Characteristics of those who improve and mechanisms of improvement are important future questions. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02631850

Saturday, June 18, 2022

Tactile Sensation Improves Following Motor Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: The VIGoROUS Randomized Controlled Trial

 Since this seems to work, it is your responsibility to create a protocol on this and distribute it to all 10 million yearly stroke survivors, future and past survivors also. Your responsibility since our fucking failures of stroke associations can't be bothered to have a database of stroke protocols and methods to reach every survivor. 

Tactile Sensation Improves Following Motor Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: The VIGoROUS Randomized Controlled Trial

First Published June 11, 2022 Research Article 

Background. 

Up to 85% of people with chronic stroke experience somatosensory impairment, which contributes to poor sensorimotor control and non-use of the affected limb. Neurophysiological mechanisms suggest motor rehabilitation may improve tactile sense post-stroke, however, somatosensory recovery has rarely been reported in controlled trials.  

Objective. 

To compare the effect of four upper limb motor rehabilitation programs on the recovery of tactile sensation in adults with chronic stroke.  

Methods. 

Adults with chronic stroke and mild or moderate upper extremity hemiparesis (n = 167) were enrolled in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Participants completed three weeks of gaming therapy, gaming therapy with additional telerehabilition, Constraint-Induced Movement therapy, or traditional rehabilitation. Here, we report the results of a secondary outcome, tactile sensation, measured with monofilaments, before and after treatment, and 6 months later.  

Results. 

A mixed-effects general linear model revealed similar positive change in tactile sensitivity regardless of the type of training. On average, participants were able to detect a stimulus that was 32% and 33% less after training and at 6-month follow-up, respectively. One-third of participants experienced recategorization of their level of somatosensory impairment (e.g., regained protective sensation) following training. Poorer tactile sensation at baseline was associated with greater change.  

Conclusions. 

About one-third of individuals with mild/moderate chronic hemiparesis experience sustained improvements in tactile sensation following motor rehabilitation, regardless of the extent of tactile input in the rehabilitation program. Potential for sensory improvement is an additional motivator for those post-stroke. Characteristics of those who improve and mechanisms of improvement are important future questions. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02631850

 

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

Tactile Sensation Improves Following Motor Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: The VIGoROUS Randomized Controlled Trial

'Improves' is NOT GOOD ENOUGH!  What will it take to have all research lead to 100% recovery?  How many people need to be replaced before we get to that?

Tactile Sensation Improves Following Motor Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: The VIGoROUS Randomized Controlled Trial

First Published June 11, 2022 Research Article 

Background. 

Up to 85% of people with chronic stroke experience somatosensory impairment, which contributes to poor sensorimotor control and non-use of the affected limb. Neurophysiological mechanisms suggest motor rehabilitation may improve tactile sense post-stroke, however, somatosensory recovery has rarely been reported in controlled trials.  

Objective. 

To compare the effect of four upper limb motor rehabilitation programs on the recovery of tactile sensation in adults with chronic stroke.  

Methods. 

Adults with chronic stroke and mild or moderate upper extremity hemiparesis (n = 167) were enrolled in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Participants completed three weeks of gaming therapy, gaming therapy with additional telerehabilition, Constraint-Induced Movement therapy, or traditional rehabilitation. Here, we report the results of a secondary outcome, tactile sensation, measured with monofilaments, before and after treatment, and 6 months later. 

Results. 

A mixed-effects general linear model revealed similar positive change in tactile sensitivity regardless of the type of training. On average, participants were able to detect a stimulus that was 32% and 33% less after training and at 6-month follow-up, respectively. One-third of participants experienced recategorization of their level of somatosensory impairment (e.g., regained protective sensation) following training. Poorer tactile sensation at baseline was associated with greater change.  

Conclusions. 

About one-third of individuals with mild/moderate chronic hemiparesis experience sustained improvements in tactile sensation following motor rehabilitation, regardless of the extent of tactile input in the rehabilitation program. Potential for sensory improvement is an additional motivator for those post-stroke. Characteristics of those who improve and mechanisms of improvement are important future questions. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02631850

 

Tuesday, July 13, 2021

Sensory Stimulation of the Foot and Ankle Early Post-stroke: A Pilot and Feasibility Study

Since the outcome measure wasn't 100% recovery you used the tyranny of low expectations to get the survivors to  accept the outcomes. You'll have to ask your doctor to get the protocol for mobilization and tactile stimulation.

Sensory Stimulation of the Foot and Ankle Early Post-stroke: A Pilot and Feasibility Study

  • 1School of Allied Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
  • 2Acquired Brain Injury Recovery Alliance (ABIRA), School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
  • 3National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Brain Injury MedTech Co-operative, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • 4School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom

Background: Somatosensory stimulation of the lower extremity could improve motor recovery and walking post-stroke. This pilot study investigated the feasibility of a subsequent randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether task-specific gait training is more effective following either (a) intensive hands-on somatosensory stimulation or (b) wearing textured insoles.

Objectives: Determine recruitment and attrition rates, adherence to intervention, acceptability and viability of interventions and outcome measures, and estimate variance of outcome data to inform sample size for a subsequent RCT.

Methods: Design: randomized, single-blinded, mixed-methods pilot study.

Setting: In-patient rehabilitation ward and community.

Participants: n = 34, 18+years, 42–112 days following anterior or posterior circulation stroke, able to follow simple commands, able to walk independently pre-stroke, and providing informed consent.

Intervention: Twenty 30-min sessions of task-specific gait training (TSGT) (delivered over 6 weeks) in addition to either: (a) 30–60 min mobilization and tactile stimulation (MTS); or (b) unlimited textured insole (TI) wearing.

Outcomes: Ankle range of movement (electrogoniometer), touch-pressure sensory thresholds (Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments), motor impairment (Lower Extremity Motricity Index), walking ability and speed (Functional Ambulation Category, 5-m walk test, pressure insoles) and function (modified Rivermead Mobility Index), measured before randomization, post-intervention, and 1-month thereafter (follow-up). Adherence to allocated intervention and actual dose delivered (fidelity) were documented in case report forms and daily diaries. Focus groups further explored acceptability of interventions and study experience.

Analysis: Recruitment, attrition, and dose adherence rates were calculated as percentages of possible totals. Thematic analysis of daily diaries and focus group data was undertaken. Standard deviations of outcome measures were calculated and used to inform a sample size calculation.

Results: Recruitment, attrition, and adherence rates were 48.57, 5.88, and 96.88%, respectively. Focus groups, daily-diaries and case report forms indicated acceptability of interventions and outcome measures to participants. The 5-m walk was selected as primary outcome measure for a future trial [mean (SD) at end of intervention: 16.86 (11.24) MTS group and 21.56 (13.57) TI group]; sample size calculation indicated 60 participants are required per group.

Conclusion: Recruitment, attrition and adherence rates and acceptability of interventions and outcomes justify a subsequent powered RCT of MTS+TSGT compared with TI+TSGT.

Introduction

Every 2 s, someone in the world experiences a stroke; there are more than 1.2 million stroke survivors in the United Kingdom (UK) alone (1). Many stroke survivors—between 65% (2) and 85% (3)—experience somatosensory impairment. This impacts adversely on the ability to detect, discriminate, and recognise sensations from the body because somatosensory function includes tactile sensation, vibration, pressure, proprioception, temperature, and pain (4). Somatosensory impairment of the lower limb is experienced by between 45% (5) and 56% (6) of stroke survivors and makes performance of everyday tasks difficult (5, 7). Consequently, potential for achieving independent walking post-stroke is decreased (8).

Regaining the ability to walk is a priority for many stroke survivors. Identifying best treatments to address balance, gait, and mobility has been identified by the James Lind Alliance as one of the top 10 research priorities for stroke (9). Progress is promised by interventions aiming to reduce motor impairment and thus recovery of body functions toward their pre-stroke state by utilising the principles of activity-driven neuroplasticity (10). Interventions to facilitate activity-driven neuroplasticity are placed into a framework of priming, augmentation, and practise (11).

Priming interventions prepare the sensorimotor system for motor function, specifically when limited or no volitional control of movement exists. Priming can be achieved through the provision of somatosensory stimulation as a precursor to task-specific training (11). Therapists can deliver intensive proprioceptive and tactile stimulation through a hands-on intervention known as mobilization and tactile stimulation (MTS) (12). Research into MTS for the contralesional hand post-stroke found reduction of motor impairment and improved upper-limb function (13, 14). MTS is also applied to the foot (15, 16). It is hypothesised that greater somatosensory awareness and alignment of the foot, through intensive somatosensory stimulation using MTS, improves the ability to place and transfer weight over the foot, permitting adaptation to different floor surfaces. However, this has not yet been tested.

Augmenting interventions may also enhance somatosensation during task-specific activity. For example, standing on textured materials (17) and wearing textured insoles (TIs) in shoes to improve perceptual motor performance (18). TIs are designed to stimulate sensory receptors on the plantar surface of the foot: tactile (19), pressure (20), and vibration (21). Afferent information from the foot and ankle is, therefore, crucial for postural control and walking capacity (22). TIs that enhance sensory awareness of the foot during motor activity are also expected to improve contact of the foot with the supporting surface and thus interaction between the foot and the floor, which is important for functional activity (23). The use of TIs is a “hands-off,” low-cost augmentation strategy that has been shown to reduce mediolateral sway in healthy populations (24), and change spatiotemporal gait parameters in people with multiple sclerosis (25). However, TIs have not yet been investigated in a stroke population, stimulating the contralesional side.

Practice interventions use task-specific training, which is recommended when stroke survivors can repeat and practice movements or tasks (11). Task-specific training has been shown to improve motor function post-stroke (2628). More specifically, task-specific gait training (TSGT) is an effective intervention after stroke (26, 2931).

It is known that afferent input can influence motor control (32, 33). However, it is not known whether combining TSGT with somatosensory stimulation—either priming using MTS, or augmentation by wearing TIs—would increase the effect. The hypothesis is that MTS (priming intervention) immediately before TSGT has greater efficacy than TSGT combined with wearing TIs (augmentation intervention) in reducing sensorimotor impairment and improving functional ability of the more paretic lower limb after stroke. Before this hypothesis can be tested in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) it was important to undertake a pilot study to determine the viability of a subsequent RCT (34, 35).

The objectives for this study were to:

1. Estimate recruitment rate for a subsequent RCT.

2. Estimate attrition rate for a subsequent RCT.

3. Estimate the adherence rate to the interventions and their acceptability to participants.

4. Investigate acceptability and feasibility (effective delivery and success of blinding) of a battery of outcome measures, to inform primary and secondary outcome measures for a future trial.

5. Undertake a sample size calculation for a subsequent RCT, using the estimated variance of the selected primary outcome measure.

6. Monitor the type and frequency of adverse events.

 

 

Tuesday, February 16, 2021

Impairments of cortico-cortical connectivity in fine tactile sensation after stroke

Describes a problem, offers NO SOLUTION.  USELESS.

Impairments of cortico-cortical connectivity in fine tactile sensation after stroke

 

Abstract

Background

Fine tactile sensation plays an important role in motor relearning after stroke. However, little is known about its dynamics in post-stroke recovery, principally due to a lack of effective evaluation on neural responses to fine tactile stimulation. This study investigated the post-stroke alteration of cortical connectivity and its functional structure in response to fine tactile stimulation via textile fabrics by electroencephalogram (EEG)-derived functional connectivity and graph theory analyses.

Method

Whole brain EEG was recorded from 64 scalp channels in 8 participants with chronic stroke and 8 unimpaired controls before and during the skin of the unilateral forearm contacted with a piece of cotton fabric. Functional connectivity (FC) was then estimated using EEG coherence. The fabric stimulation induced FC (SFC) was analyzed by a cluster-based permutation test for the FC in baseline and fabric stimulation. The functional structure of connectivity alteration in the brain was also investigated by assessing the multiscale topological properties of functional brain networks according to the graph theory.

Results

In the SFC distribution, an altered hemispheric lateralization (HL) (HL degree, 14%) was observed when stimulating the affected forearm in the stroke group, compared to stimulation of the unaffected forearm of the stroke group (HL degree, 53%) and those of the control group (HL degrees, 92% for the left and 69% for the dominant right limb). The involvement of additional brain regions, i.e., the distributed attention networks, was also observed when stimulating either limb of the stroke group compared with those of the control. Significantly increased (P < 0.05) global and local efficiencies were found when stimulating the affected forearm compared to the unaffected forearm. A significantly increased (P < 0.05) degree of inter-hemisphere FC (interdegree) mainly within ipsilesional somatosensory region and a significantly diminished degree of intra-hemisphere FC (intradegree) (P < 0.05) in ipsilesional primary somatosensory region were observed when stimulating the affected forearm, compared with the unaffected forearm.

Conclusions

The alteration of cortical connectivity in fine tactile sensation post-stroke was characterized by the compensation from the contralesional hemisphere and distributed attention networks related to involuntary attention. The interhemispheric connectivity could implement the compensation from the contralateral hemisphere to the ipsilesional somatosensory region. Stroke participants also exerted increased cortical activities in fine tactile sensation.

Background

Fine tactile sensation plays an important role in motor relearning after stroke, and participates not only in initiating effective motor behaviors but also in fine-tuning subsequent movements for fine motor control [1,2,3]. It is notable however, that there is a relatively marginal amount of knowledge regarding its dynamics in the process of post-stroke rehabilitation. This is mainly due to a lack of effective evaluation on neural responses to fine tactile stimulation. On the one hand, the traditional measures of fine tactile impairments in clinical practice are disadvantageous in terms of reliability and repeatability without direct cortical detection [3]. For example, the two-point discrimination test depends not only on the pressure applied to the finger by the examiner to induce tactile stimulation, but also on the cognitive and discriminative levels of patients in terms of subtle differences due to the inherently subjective nature of tactile sensation [3]. On the other hand, functional neuroplasticity widely occurs in multiple brain regions, including local and remote areas with respect to the lesion site reorganized after a stroke. This would further result in the cortical reorganization and connectivity disturbance, as previously reported in studies on motor functions [4, 5]. A redistributed pattern from the ipsilesional hemisphere to the contralesional hemisphere is commonly observed during motor or cognitive tasks in stroke participants [6, 7]. However, compared to the extensively studied motor impairments, little is known about the neuroplasticity associated with sensory impairments post-stroke. This is principally due to a lack of evidence regarding the strategies of cortical recruitment particularly in the area of fine tactile sensation.

There are some studies on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) which examined the changes of cortical recruitment in relation to the tactile impairment post-stroke, as revealed by functional connectivity (FC) [8, 9]. For example, Bannister et al. exploited rsfMRI to examine the relationship between the recovery of tactile sensation and the resting-state FC following a stroke. The results indicated that the changes of resting-state FC between somatosensory regions and distributed regions, including vision and attention networks, were associated with improved tactile sensation within the first 6 months post-stroke [8]. Goodin et al. also used rsfMRI to investigate the effect of different lesion sites in the hemispheres on the functional connectivity of tactile sensation in stroke participants [9]. It was found that the patients with lesions in the right hemisphere had greater intra-hemispheric connectivity from the ipsilesional primary somatosensory cortex (S1) to inferior parietal regions than those with left lesions and unimpaired controls. However, these studies revealed only the alterations of static cortical networks during the resting-state after stroke. Furthermore, fMRI is limited in terms of temporal resolution, despite the advantages of higher spatial resolution and deeper imaging of brain activities beyond the cortical level than electroencephalogram (EEG). In this sense, the fMRI is inadequate when seeking the detection of the cortical activities in transient tactile stimulation, since the sensory neurons change their levels of sensitivity to a constant stimulus over time, i.e., sensory adaptation [10]. Thus, the available results on tactile impairments post-stroke might not be suitable to reveal the strategies of the alteration in cortical connectivity during the tactile sensation, which is a typically transient process [11].

In comparison to fMRI, when evaluating the cortical connectivity, EEG offers a higher degree of temporal resolution when seeking to capture neural activities during transient tasks [12, 13]. In this regard, the EEG-derived FC [14, 15], demonstrating the interaction of information among cortical regions, has been proven to be effective in capturing the alteration of cortical connectivity in transient motor tasks in stroke survivors [16, 17]. For instance, Strens et al. compared the EEG-derived FC during a 25% maximal handgrip task in chronic stroke participants and unimpaired persons [16]. The results revealed greater FC between the ipsilesional supplementary motor area (SMA) and sensorimotor area in the stroke than the unimpaired controls, which might have a dynamically compensatory effect for brain lesion after a stroke. The EEG-derived FC has also been applied to measure the post-stroke alteration in cortical connectivity during the repeated finger extensions with a frequency of 1 Hz. It was found that the intensity of FC between contralesional motor/premotor cortex and SMA was increased in stroke subjects compared with the unimpaired controls [17]. Despite the successful evaluations of the EEG-derived FC for motor neuroplasticity following stroke, its investigation on sensory neuroplasticity has not been well carried out. Such an investigation would have the potential to further develop current understandings of the alteration in cortical connectivity in relation to the tactile impairments post-stroke.

The alteration of cortical connectivity in its functional structure can be visualized by the graph theory-based approach from a network perspective [18, 19], where the EEG channels at different cortical locations and their FCs are topographically represented as nodes and links among them [20]. The graph theory analysis has been adopted to reveal the stroke-induced changes in functional brain networks from local (e.g., single-node connectivity) to global level (e.g., connectivity of the entire brain) represented by indices at difference scales [21]. Thus the examination of the dynamic information processing and neural communication during motor or cognitive tasks was facilitated [22]. De Vico Fallani et al. also examined the functional brain organization in stroke subjects whilst engaging in the finger tapping, where inefficient brain networks were found in stroke participants with a lower capacity to integrate the information from remote brain regions and a lower capacity of processing information in local brain regions, compared with unimpaired persons [21]. Additionally, in a study by Philips et al. on persons with chronic stroke [23], the reduction of graph theoretical indices represented by the parameters of global efficiency, local efficiency and the density of intrahemispheric FC on the unaffected hemisphere was found to correlate with post-stroke motor improvements measured by the increments in the upper-extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMUE) after a physical treatment for 12 weeks. However, little has been done using the graph theoretical analysis to understand the functional structure in relation to the connectivity alteration in the brain following the post-stroke tactile impairments.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the post-stroke alteration of cortical connectivity in response to fine tactile stimulation via the textile fabric by EEG-derived functional connectivity analysis. Whole brain EEG was recorded from 64 scalp channels in 8 persons with chronic stroke and 8 age-matched unimpaired controls before and during the unilateral forearm skin contact with cotton fabric. Functional connectivity was then estimated using the EEG coherence method [24]. The fabric stimulation induced functional connectivity (SFC) was analyzed by means of a cluster-based permutation test based on the estimated FC [25]. Furthermore, the multiscale topological properties of functional brain networks were assessed using the graph theory-based method to reveal the functional structure of the connectivity alteration in the brain during transient fine tactile sensation after stroke on multiple levels. Finally, the alteration of brain connectivity in relation to the tactile impairments post-stroke was discussed in detail.

More at link.

Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Evaluating the effects of delivering integrated kinesthetic and tactile cues to individuals with unilateral hemiparetic stroke during overground walking

Useless. No mention of where to get the protocols used.  

Evaluating the effects of delivering integrated kinesthetic and tactile cues to individuals with unilateral hemiparetic stroke during overground walking


Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation201815:33
Received: 29 June 2017
Accepted: 27 March 2018
Published: 16 April 2018


Abstract

Background

Integration of kinesthetic and tactile cues for application to post-stroke gait rehabilitation is a novel concept which needs to be explored. The combined provision of haptic cues may result in collective improvement of gait parameters such as symmetry, balance and muscle activation patterns. Our proposed integrated cue system can offer a cost-effective and voluntary gait training experience for rehabilitation of subjects with unilateral hemiparetic stroke.

Methods

Ten post-stroke ambulatory subjects participated in a 10 m walking trial while utilizing the haptic cues (either alone or integrated application), at their preferred and increased gait speeds. In the system a haptic cane device (HCD) provided kinesthetic perception and a vibrotactile feedback device (VFD) provided tactile cue on the paretic leg for gait modification. Balance, gait symmetry and muscle activity were analyzed to identify the benefits of utilizing the proposed system.

Results

When using kinesthetic cues, either alone or integrated with a tactile cue, an increase in the percentage of non-paretic peak activity in the paretic muscles was observed at the preferred gait speed (vastus medialis obliquus: p<<  0.001, partial eta squared (η2) = 0.954; semitendinosus p <  0.001, partial η2 = 0.793) and increased gait speeds (vastus medialis obliquus: p <  0.001, partial η2 = 0.881; semitendinosus p = 0.028, partial η2 = 0.399). While using HCD and VFD (individual and integrated applications), subjects could walk at their preferred and increased gait speeds without disrupting trunk balance in the mediolateral direction. The temporal stance symmetry ratio was improved when using tactile cues, either alone or integrated with a kinesthetic cue, at their preferred gait speed (p <  0.001, partial η2 = 0.702).

Conclusions

When combining haptic cues, the subjects walked at their preferred gait speed with increased temporal stance symmetry and paretic muscle activity affecting their balance. Similar improvements were observed at higher gait speeds. The efficacy of the proposed system is influenced by gait speed. Improvements were observed at a 20% increased gait speed, whereas, a plateau effect was observed at a 40% increased gait speed. These results imply that integration of haptic cues may benefit(not will benefit) post-stroke gait rehabilitation by inducing simultaneous improvements in gait symmetry and muscle activity.