Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, July 19, 2025

Changes in Infarct Volume and Cerebral Edema After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Stroke Randomized to ApTOLL or Placebo: A Secondary Analysis of April Trial

 So, still a failure! NO MENTION OF GETTING TO 100% RECOVERY! The only goal in stroke! Successful thrombectomy is only the first step to survivor recovery. Since you don't have any follow on steps to get to full recovery I'd consider this incomplete research!

Changes in Infarct Volume and Cerebral Edema After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Stroke Randomized to ApTOLL or Placebo: A Secondary Analysis of April Trial


Hernández-Pérez MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8279-7954 mhernandez@igtp.cat Adrián Valls-Carbó MD Macarena Hernández-Jiménez PhD, MSc https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3329-3965 Carlos Molina MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6058-6259 José Vivancos Mora MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9339-2917 Mar Castellanos MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3116-1352 Jaime Masjuan MD, PhD Show All Marc Ribo MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-043X Author Info & Affiliations Stroke New online https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048917Information & Authors Metrics & Citations Get Access References

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

APRIL, a randomized placebo-controlled phase Ib/IIa trial, showed safety and reduced mortality and disability at 90 days(NOT GOOD ENOUGH! Survivors want full recovery! GET THERE!) of ApTOLL 0.2 mg/kg in combination with endovascular treatment in patients with acute large vessel occlusion within a 6-hour window. We studied the effect of ApTOLL against placebo on final infarct volume, infarct growth, and cerebral edema.

METHODS:

Post hoc analysis of a trial was conducted between 2020 and 2022 in Spain and France. Patients allocated to ApTOLL doses of 0.05 and 0.2 mg/kg and placebo were selected. The early infarct growth rate was defined as admission relative cerebral blood flow <30% volume/time elapsed from last-known well to imaging, considering fast progressors when >10 mL/h. An imaging core laboratory evaluated final infarct volume and cerebral edema on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery or noncontrast computed tomography at 72 hours if fluid-attenuated inversion recovery was not available. Cerebral edema was evaluated according to the SITS-MOST (Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study) edema scale (cerebral edema degree [CED]; less severe: CED1; more severe: CED2; and with midline shift: CED3). Infarct growth was calculated as the final infarct volume: relative cerebral blood flow <30% volume at admission. Associations were studied through linear or ordinal models adjusted by prespecified variables. Admission relative cerebral blood flow <30% volume, fast recruitment, and final expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, among others, were examined for interaction with ApTOLL on final infarct volume and CED.

RESULTS:

A total of 136 of 139 patients had sufficient radiological data. Median admission relative cerebral blood flow <30% was 18 mL, and median final infarct volume was 36.53 mL. Edema grade was CED1 in 45%, CED2 in 34%, and CED3 in 21% patients. Compared with placebo, ApTOLL 0.2 mg/kg was independently associated with a lower final infarct volume (relative reduction, –45.2% [95% CI, −65% to −15%]), a lower infarct growth (61.51% [95% CI, −79% to −29%]), and a lower edema grade (cOR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.15–0.96]). No associations were found for ApTOLL 0.05 mg/kg. The study of interactions showed a greater benefit of ApTOLL 0.2 mg/kg among patients with larger core volume at admission, fast progressors, and patients achieving incomplete reperfusion (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction <2b).

CONCLUSIONS:

ApTOLL 0.2 mg/kg in combination with mechanical thrombectomy significantly reduced final infarct volume, infarct growth, and cerebral edema at 72 hours. ApTOLL seemed to be more effective under conditions prone to infarct growth.

Graphical Abstract

Get full access to this article

No comments:

Post a Comment