The impact of bimanual reach training with augmented position sense feedback on post-stroke upper limb somatosensory and motor impairment

 I see nothing that suggests spastic arms were tested. There would be no reaching at all regardless of position sense. I need spasticity to be cured before I'll ever be able to reach again. 

The impact of bimanual reach training with augmented position sense feedback on post-stroke upper limb somatosensory and motor impairment

• Beverley C. Larssen,
• Ronan Denyer,
• Mahta Khoshnam Tehrani,
• Anjana Rajendran,
• Carlo Menon &
• Lara Boyd 

Abstract

Background

Impaired arm position sense is a common somatosensory impairment after stroke, which significantly impacts the performance of functional activities using the upper limb. However, few clinical interventions target loss of position sense after stroke. Our aim was to use interlimb force-coupling to augment position sense of the stroke-affected arm during a bilateral reaching task and investigate the impact of training with this feedback manipulation on measures of arm position matching ability and both bilateral and unilateral motor control.

Methods

Twenty-four participants with a history of stroke were randomized (N = 12/group) to perform mirrored bimanual aiming movements with either interlimb force-coupling (Augmented PF) or uncoupled symmetrical reaches with only visual feedback about movement position. Participants completed 11 sessions (295 bimanual reaches/session) using a Kinarm End-Point robot. Performance on measures of arm position sense (Arm Position Matching, APM), motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer Upper Limb, FM), motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test, WMFT), unilateral reach accuracy and speed (Visually Guided Reaching, VGR), and bilateral reach symmetry were collected before and after training to characterize changes in upper limb somatosensory and motor control performance.

Results

APM Task Scores improved for both groups. This improvement was specifically observed through reduced APM variability, but not accuracy. FM scores also improved for both groups. The group that did not practice with force-coupling between limbs improved on measures of bilateral movement symmetry on a mirrored reaching task and had faster VGR movement times in post-test.

Conclusion

Symmetrical reach training with or without augmented PF led to reduced motor impairment and benefited upper limb position matching ability by reducing APM variability. Augmenting position sense during reaching did not provide additional benefits for position matching accuracy. Advantages for unilateral movement speed and bilateral reach symmetry measures in the group that practiced without interlimb coupling may reflect specificity of practice effects due to similarity between test and training conditions for this group.