Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, January 22, 2026

The best approach against cognitive decline in the elderly

 Your competent? doctor has read all these hundreds of research articles and CHOSEN THE EXACT BEST PROTOCOL to prevent your cognitive decline, right? Or doesn't your doctor acknowledge that responsibility to get you recovered? Ask him/her EXACTLY WHAT IS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY! I bet you won't like the answer because I'm sure 100% recovery is not in there!

  • cognitive decline (359 posts to December 2011)
  • cognitive deficits (17 posts to December 2016)
  • cognitive disorders (18 posts to July 2015)
  • cognitive impairment (161 posts to August 2021)
  • cognitive recovery (24 posts to March 2015)
  • cognitive rehabilitation (26 posts to December 2015)
  • cognitive training (68 posts to August 2012)
  • The best approach against cognitive decline in the elderly

    Highlight

    In a randomized clinical trial of 2,111 older adults at risk for cognitive decline and dementia, a structured lifestyle intervention demonstrated significantly greater benefit on global cognition over two years compared with a self-guided intervention.

    Background

    • Identifying effective interventions to slow or prevent cognitive decline associated with dementia is a public health priority due to the growing number of affected individuals and the profound economic, psychological, and social impacts of the disease.

    • Late cognitive decline is often attributable to mixed pathologies, and effective treatment is likely to require a diversified therapeutic strategy to address the different mechanisms associated with Alzheimer's disease and vascular disease.

    • Recent advances in the use of anti-amyloid antibodies demonstrate evidence of slowing the specific clinical progression of Alzheimer's disease, however, these treatments are only approved for individuals with confirmed disease.

    • Non-pharmacological strategies targeting modifiable risk factors offer a promising, low-cost, accessible, and safe approach with the potential to reduce the incidence of dementia by up to 45%.

    • The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) demonstrated significant cognitive benefit after two years of intervention in multiple domains in older adults at high risk of dementia.

    • The World-Wide FINGERS network was launched in 2017 to promote global collaboration, protocol alignment, and data sharing between non-pharmacological risk reduction trials.

    Methodology

    • Randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial that included 2,111 participants at five clinical sites in the United States, with recruitment from May 2019 to March 2023 and final follow-up until May 14, 2025.

    • Inclusion criteria were defined to select a population at higher risk of cognitive decline, including ages between 60 and 79 years, sedentary lifestyle, and inadequate diet, in addition to at least two other factors such as family history of memory impairment, cardiometabolic risk, race and ethnicity, advanced age, and gender.

    • Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the structured intervention (n = 1,056) or the self-guided intervention (n = 1,055), both of which encouraged increased physical and cognitive activity, a healthy diet, social engagement, and cardiovascular health monitoring.

    • The primary comparison was the difference between the intervention groups in the annual variation in global cognitive function, assessed by a composite measure of executive function, episodic memory, and processing speed, over two years.

    Key findings Among the 2,111 enrolled participants (mean age 68.2 years [standard deviation, 5.2]; 1,455 [68.9%] women), 89% completed the second-year assessment. The overall cognitive composite score increased over time relative to baseline in both groups. The benefit of the structured intervention was systematic for both APOE-ε4 carriers and non-carriers (P = 0.95 for interaction), but appeared greater for adults with lower versus higher baseline cognition (P = 0.02 for interaction). Fewer adverse events were reported in the structured intervention group (151 serious and 1,091 non-serious) compared to the self-guided intervention group (190 serious and 1,225 non-serious), with a positive COVID-19 result being the most common overall adverse event in the structured intervention group. In Practice "The US POINTER study yielded three main findings. First, in a large cohort of older adults at high risk of cognitive decline associated with dementia, multi-domain lifestyle interventions were safely and with high adherence. Second, the most structured, accountable, and intense intervention resulted in a statistically significant relative improvement in cognitive benefit over two years. Third, this benefit was consistent across several important subgroups," the authors wrote. Source The study was led by Dr. Laura D. Baker, PhD, and Dr. Mark A. Espeland, PhD, of Wake Forest University School of Medicine, USA. It was published online on July 28 in the journal JAMA. Limitations The generalizability of the results may be limited by the inclusion of only five centers, the selective inclusion criteria to increase the likelihood of risk of cognitive decline, and the requirement for randomization and completion of a two-year trial with extensive phenotyping. The study was not designed to assess outcomes of cognitive impairment or dementia. The self-guided intervention group did not serve as a true no-intervention control. Participants were not blinded to the intervention assignment. The durability, scalability, and long-term clinical significance of the intervention remain unknown. While there is no evidence that missing data biased the results, this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. Conflicts of Interest Dr. Mark A. Espeland reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and remuneration from Annovis Bio, Acumen Pharma, and Nestlé. Dr. Whitmer reported receiving grants from the NIH. Dr. Yu reported receiving grants from Biogen, Eisai, AriBio, Suven, and Novo Nordisk. Dr. Kivipelto reported serving on scientific advisory boards for Combinostics, Eisai, Eli Lilly, and Nestlé. The study was supported by the Alzheimer's Association. The U.S. Highbush Blueberry Council provided monthly reimbursements to participants assigned to the structured intervention. Other conflict of interest disclosures are included in the original article. This content was produced using various editing tools, including artificial intelligence (AI), as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment