Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, September 1, 2017

Study challenges conventional wisdom on fats, fruits and vegetables

Your doctors and nutritionists should be running around in circles to get new diet protocols out for all their patients. You should expect something new in the next week. If not, call the hospital president and ask when the hell competent staff will be hired. You obviously can't do anything with this until you get new directions from your doctor.
https://www.mdlinx.com/family-medicine/top-medical-news/article/2017/08/31/7411851

Reuters Health News
Global dietary guidelines should possibly be changed to allow people to consume somewhat more fats, to cut back on carbohydrates and in some cases to slightly scale back on fruits and vegetables, a large study suggests.
Over the course of about 7 years, diets with roughly 35% of calories from fats were tied to a lower mortality rate than diets with about 60% of calories from carbohydrates.
"What we are suggesting is moderation as opposed to very low and very high intakes of fats and carbohydrates," said Mahshid Dehghan from McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
The World Health Organization currently advises people to get no more than 30% of energy from fats and to avoid saturated fats found in things like animal products. Those recommendations are based on data from North America and Europe, however.
Dehghan and colleagues write in The Lancet, in a paper online August 29, that cardiovascular disease is a global epidemic, with 80% of the burden being found in low– and middle–income countries.
The new data are drawn from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study, which recruited people ages 35 to 70 in 18 countries between 2003 and 2013. The researchers had dietary and other information from 135,335 people who were followed for roughly 7 years.
During the study period, the researchers identified 5,796 deaths and 4,784 cardiovascular events in the study population.
When the researchers separated people into quintiles based on carbohydrate consumption, they found that people who ate the most carbohydrates were 28% more likely to die from any cause during the study than those who ate the least.
When people were divided into quintiles based on how their fat consumption, those who consumed the most fat – of any kind – were about 23% less likely to die during the study than those who ate the least. The findings were consistent no matter what type of fat was consumed.
"We are hoping that dietary guidelines are reconsidered in light of the new findings," Dehghan told Reuters Health.
Guidelines could relax restrictions on fat while focusing on carbohydrate intake, for example.
A second analysis from the PURE study also suggests that the benefits of eating fruits and vegetable aren't limitless.
WHO guidelines suggest five servings of fruits, vegetables or legumes each day, according to coauthor Victoria Miller, who is also with McMaster University.
Those guidelines, again, are mostly based on evidence from North America and Europe. In other parts of the world, five servings of fruit each day may be too expensive.
"Our findings show the lowest risk of death was among people who ate three to four servings with little additional benefit beyond that range," said Miller.
If dietary guidelines were adjusted to reflect a smaller recommended amount, she told Reuters Health, it would be more achievable and more people would meet that goal.
Miller also emphasized that people who are meeting or exceeding the daily goal of fruits, vegetables and legumes shouldn't take the findings as a license to eat less of those foods.
"We don’t want to tell people who are eating more than the recommendation to eat less," she said. "That’s not the message."
—Andrew M. Seaman

No comments:

Post a Comment