‘First, Do No Harm’: Patient Safety for Healthcare Professionals

 But this misses the acts of omission that don't impact the current patients but do impact all the following patients. 

Example: 

1. Your stroke medical team does no analysis why their stroke patient did not 100% recover.

2. If they did and determine that research already out there if completed and creates protocols would have solved that recovery issue. If they did nothing then that is also a deliberate act of omission and does harm future patients.

3. Until stroke medical professionals take responsibility for getting survivors 100% recovered, I consider them failing at the 'do no harm' edict.

‘First, Do No Harm’: Patient Safety for Healthcare Professionals

By: Elite LearningMarch 16, 2021

Share:

It’s a fact of life: Mistakes happen. When those mistakes involve medical errors, however, the costs can be devastating to patients, families, and healthcare providers. No one is infallible, but healthcare professionals have a responsibility to not only understand issues related to patient safety, but also foster a culture of safety within their organization.

A brief history of patient safety

Established in 1951, The Joint Commission is a leading independent nonprofit organization dedicated to improving patient safety in healthcare environments worldwide.

Best expressed through their National Patient Safety Goals, The Joint Commission works to illuminate high-priority patient safety issues—like preventing hospital-acquired infections and medication errors, maintaining safety during surgeries, ensuring correct patient identification, enhancing communication between staff, and identifying patients at risk for suicide.

Top priorities: The “never-evers”

A patient is wheeled into the surgical suite for a partial mastectomy on her right breast. The surgeon—whether due to exhaustion, poor communication, or misunderstanding—prepares for surgery on the patient’s left breast. A surgical nurse notes the discrepancy and calls for a time-out to clarify, thankfully sparing the patient a wrong-site procedure.

This is an example of a “never-ever event.” First introduced in 2001 by Dr. Ken Kizer, former CEO of the National Quality Forum, the term is used to describe especially shocking medical errors (such as wrong-site or wrong-patient surgery) that should never occur.

In most cases, a never-ever event will have three main features. First, it is an unambiguous event. No one would argue, for example, that leaving a piece of equipment in the patient’s body after surgery is a positive outcome. Second, it is a serious event. The human body does not function well with pieces of gauze or broken instruments inside it. Finally, a never-ever event is usually preventable. A careful inspection of the surgical tools beforehand, paired with a thorough check after the procedure, would have likely spared the patient this never-ever event.

To learn more about client and patient safety in healthcare, enroll in the following CE courses: Protecting Patient Safety: Preventing Medical Errors, 2nd Edition, Keeping Clients Safe: Error and Safety in Behavioral Health Settings, 2nd Edition, and Patient Safety: A Critical Practice Concern.

Hospital-acquired conditions (HACs)

Some patient safety issues are unique to the hospital setting. From human error to lax hygiene practices to missteps due to understaffing, these conditions can be life-threatening and often fall into the “never-ever” category. Some of the most common hospital-acquired conditions are:

• Foreign objects retained after surgery, also referred to as unintended retention of foreign objects (URFOs) or retained surgical items (such as sponges, towels, needles, or broken surgical instruments)
• Intravascular air embolism, where air trapped in the arterial or venous circulation blocks blood flow
• Blood incompatibility, where a patient is given the incorrect donor blood, causing their immune system to turn against the donated blood
• Falls and trauma, an HAC that’s most common in older adults but can occur in patients of any age, dependent on pathophysiology and medication
• Poor glycemic control, where blood glucose levels are improperly managed
• Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs)
• Vascular catheter-associated infection

Checking all the boxes

Effective patient safety practices begin with clear, well-documented communication standards, rigorous hygiene, and simple vigilance. Checklists may be onerous, but they can save lives. For example, a healthcare provider may want to ask the following questions before, during, and after a procedure:

• In the surgical suite, has the patient’s identity been verified using two different forms of ID?
• Have all members of the surgical team followed proper hygiene guidelines?
• Is the patient’s medication clearly labeled? Have any allergies or pre-existing conditions been noted?
• As the patient prepares for discharge, have the requirements relating to their medication been explained to them in ways they can understand?

Taking the extra minute to ensure compliance with standard safety procedures is time well spent. For a patient, those few extra minutes of care may be the difference between life and death.

This article is based on the 4-hour Nursing CE course, “Patient Safety: A Critical Practice Concern,”  written by Adrianne E. Avillion, D.Ed., RN.