Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label ticagrelor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ticagrelor. Show all posts

Monday, June 20, 2022

Ticagrelor Induced Angioedema Following Carotid Artery Stenting

 

When your doctor suggests this(CAS)have them guarantee no complications.

Problems to consider:

You might want to ask your doctor about this?

New ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI after treatment were found in 51% of cases after stenting.  Link here

 

1.  Talk to your doctor about why you would want to put inflexible metal stents in flexible arteries.

2. You might want to prevent stent placement complications per European Society of Cardiology

A - Minor complications

  • Carotid artery spasm

  • Sustained hypotension / bradycardia

  • Carotid artery dissection

  • Contrast encephalopathy (very rare)

  • Minor embolic neurological events (TIAs)

B - Major complications

  • Major embolic stroke

  • Intracranial hemorrhage

  • Hyperperfusion syndrome

  • Carotid perforation (very rare)

  • Acute stent thrombosis (very rare)

  • Complications at the site of the vascular access

Ticagrelor Induced Angioedema Following Carotid Artery Stenting

First Published April 23, 2022 Case Report 

Ticagrelor is a frequent component of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following carotid artery stent placement. Hemorrhagic complications remain the focus of most reports, however, other adverse events must also be known to the prescribing physician. Angioedema is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication reported following ticagrelor administration and we present 1 such case here with a review of the existing literature.

 

Tuesday, April 26, 2022

Ticagrelor Induced Angioedema Following Carotid Artery Stenting

With this and earlier reports of stenting problems you'll want your doctor to GUARANTEE no problems.  I can see zero use for stenting if the Circle of Willis is complete, just close up the offending artery to prevent the throwing of clots. But don't listen to me, I'm not medically trained.

Have your doctor vet this: Up-to-date perspective on the treatment of cervical carotid high-degree stenosis, DEBATE: treat or not to treat?

Ticagrelor Induced Angioedema Following Carotid Artery Stenting

First Published April 23, 2022 Case Report 

Ticagrelor is a frequent component of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following carotid artery stent placement. Hemorrhagic complications remain the focus of most reports, however, other adverse events must also be known to the prescribing physician. Angioedema is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication reported following ticagrelor administration and we present 1 such case here with a review of the existing literature.

 

Monday, April 25, 2022

Benefits of ticagrelor, aspirin for stroke outweigh risks over 30 days

So you know what your doctor is considering after your stroke.

Benefits of ticagrelor, aspirin for stroke outweigh risks over 30 days

The benefits of ticagrelor and aspirin outweighed the risk for major hemorrhage in patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke or at high risk for transient ischemic attack during 30 days of treatment, according to a Neurology study.

“Due to their pharmacological effects, long-term treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, which has triggered interest in defining the duration of therapy with the best benefit-risk profile,” Yongjun Wang, MD, of Beijing Tiantan Hospital and Capital Medical University, and colleagues wrote.

human head, brain highlighted
Source: Adobe Stock.

Researchers sought to determine the short-term benefits and risks of ticagrelor with aspirin in patients with acute mild to moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA in the THALES (The Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Treated with Ticagrelor and ASA for Prevention of Stroke and Death) trial.

They analyzed 11,016 patients (5,523 in the ticagrelor-aspirin group, 5,493 in the aspirin-only group; mean age, 65 years; 39% women) and evaluated the cumulative incidence of irreversible efficacy and safety outcomes at various intervals during the 30-day treatment period. Researchers categorized efficacy as major ischemic events, defined as a composite of ischemic stroke or non-hemorrhagic death, and safety as major hemorrhage, defined as a composite of intracranial hemorrhage and fatal bleedings. They classified net clinical impact as the combination of the two.

Results showed the reduction of major ischemic events by ticagrelor occurred in the first week (4.1% vs. 5.3%; absolute risk reduction = 1.15%; 95% CI, 0.36-1.94) and remained through 30 days. In addition, researchers observed an increase in major hemorrhage during the first week, which remained relatively constant in subsequent weeks (absolute risk increase = 0.3%). Cumulative analysis also showed that net clinical impact favored the ticagrelor-aspirin group within the first week (aRR = 0.97%; 95% CI, 0.17-1.77) and remained constant through the treatment period.

“This analysis does not support shortening the 30-day regimen of (dual anti-platelet therapy) with ticagrelor and aspirin, and shorter treatment period has not been studied,” Wang and colleagues wrote.

 

Monday, September 6, 2021

Ischemic Benefit and Hemorrhage Risk Of Ticagrelor-Aspirin Versus Aspirin In Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Or TIA

 You can hope that your doctor and hospital are following this and have set up a protocol on this.

Ischemic Benefit and Hemorrhage Risk Of Ticagrelor-Aspirin Versus Aspirin In Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Or TIA
Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035555Stroke. ;0

Background and Purpose: In patients with acute mild-moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA), the Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Treated with Ticagrelor and Aspirin for Prevention of Stroke and Death (THALES) trial demonstrated that when added to aspirin, ticagrelor reduced stroke or death but increased risk of severe hemorrhage compared with placebo. The primary efficacy outcome of THALES included hemorrhagic stroke and death, events also counted in the primary safety outcome. We sought to disentangle risk and benefit, assess their relative impact, and attempt to identify subgroups with disproportionate risk or benefit.

Methods: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of patients with mild-to-moderate acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA, patients were randomized within 24 hours after symptom onset to a 30-day regimen of either ticagrelor plus aspirin or matching placebo plus aspirin. For the present analyses, we defined the efficacy outcome, major ischemic events, as the composite of ischemic stroke or non-hemorrhagic death, and defined the safety outcome, major hemorrhage, as intracranial hemorrhage or hemorrhagic death. Net clinical impact was defined as the combination of these two endpoints.

Results: In 11 016 patients (5523 ticagrelor-aspirin and 5493 aspirin), a major ischemic event occurred in 294 patients (5.3%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and in 359 patients (6.5%) in the aspirin group (absolute risk reduction 1.19%, 95%CI 0.31%-2.07%). Major hemorrhage occurred in 22 patients (0.4%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 6 patients (0.1%) in the aspirin group (absolute risk increase 0.29%, 95% CI, 0.10-0.48%). Net clinical impact favored ticagrelor-aspirin (absolute risk reduction 0.97%, 95% CI, 0.08%-1.87%). Findings were similar when different thresholds for disability were applied and over a range of predefined subgroups.

Conclusions: In patients with mild-moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA, ischemic benefits of 30-day treatment with ticagrelor-aspirin outweigh risks of hemorrhage.

Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03354429

 

Saturday, November 7, 2020

Brilinta Wins Indication in Recurrent Stroke Prevention

Nothing on whether this is better than warfarin, so your doctor is still just guessing on secondary stroke prevention. Hope you are OK with such guesswork.

Brilinta Wins Indication in Recurrent Stroke Prevention

FDA approval based on THALES give the drug a foothold beyond CVD

Ticagrelor (Brilinta) over a computer rendering of a brain with a flash of light symbolizing a stroke above FDA APPROVED

FDA granted ticagrelor (Brilinta) an indication for secondary prevention in stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA), AstraZeneca announced.

The P2Y12 inhibitor is to be used as part of a dual antiplatelet regimen along with a daily maintenance dose of 75-100 mg aspirin for the reduction of recurrent stroke risk.

The expanded indication was based on the THALES trial, which was published in July in the New England Journal of Medicine.

In the trial with more than 11,000 participants, minor stroke and TIA patients randomized to ticagrelor plus aspirin had lower 30-day composite stroke and death rates than those randomized to aspirin alone (5.5% vs 6.6%, HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.96).

The benefit had been driven by fewer ischemic strokes (5.0% vs 6.3%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93), with no significant difference in mortality rates between groups (0.7% vs 0.5%, HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.81-2.19).

Ticagrelor did, however, lead to more severe bleeding (0.5% vs 0.1%, HR 3.99, 95% CI 1.74-9.14) and more intracranial hemorrhage (0.4% vs 0.1%, HR 3.33, 95% CI 1.34-8.28).

THALES investigators estimated a number needed to treat (NNT) of 92 to prevent one stroke or death and a number needed to harm of 263 for severe bleeding.

"One in four patients who have had a stroke will experience a second one, with the risk particularly high within the first 30 days. The approval of Brilinta in combination with aspirin is an important advancement to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and much-awaited good news for physicians and patients," said THALES lead investigator S. Claiborne Johnston, MD, PhD, of the University of Texas at Austin, in a press release.

Following FDA approval of the new indication, Johnston's group released a secondary analysis of THALES, which showed ticagrelor associated with fewer disabling strokes, from either the progression of the index event or a new stroke.

Incidence of recurrent disabling stroke (with modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 2+) or death at 30 days reached 4.0% in the ticagrelor plus aspirin group and 4.7% of those taking aspirin alone (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.99).

The NNT was 133 to prevent one disabling stroke or death and 112 to prevent one disabling or fatal ischemic stroke, the investigators reported in JAMA Neurology in conjunction with presentation at the European Stroke Organization/World Stroke Organization virtual conference.

The reduction of disabling stroke was consistent across prespecified subgroups with the exception of people with diabetes. This finding may be due to chance or could reflect hypofibrinolysis in these individuals, Johnston and colleagues suggested.

Ticagrelor did not significantly reduce recurrent non-disabling strokes (mRS 0-1) or death at 30 days in the trial (1.3% vs 1.6%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57-1.08).

Overall, treatment with ticagrelor was associated with less disability when recurrent strokes did occur. In patients with recurrent ischemic stroke, the resulting disability burden favored ticagrelor over aspirin alone (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.91).

Independent predictors of recurrent disabling stroke were baseline NIH Stroke Scale score 4 to 5, ipsilateral stenosis of at least 30%, Asian race, older age, and higher systolic blood pressure.

Johnston's team cautioned that residual confounding was possible in the secondary analysis. There was also no disability assessment at day 90, though authors argued that 30-day mRS is highly correlated with 90-day mRS scores.

Ticagrelor's new indication for stroke prevention joins its other existing indications: reduction of risk of cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome or a history of MI; and reduction of the risk of a first MI or stroke in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.

Notably, ticagrelor is more expensive than clopidogrel (Plavix), another P2Y12 inhibitor used in secondary stroke prevention.

Unlike ticagrelor, however, clopidogrel did not significantly reduce disabling ischemic strokes when added to aspirin in the POINT trial. It took a pooling of the CHANCE and POINT trials to suggest such a benefit, Johnston and colleagues noted.

The CHANCE-2 trial directly comparing the two P2Y12 inhibitors is ongoing.

Last Updated November 07, 2020
 

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Brilinta Boosts Secondary Stroke Prevention

For discussion with your doctor and while you are at it ask what the 30-day death rate is at their hospital. No knowledge, fire them, because it means they don't care about or know what the fuck they are doing.

DO YOU MEASURE ANYTHING?
  1. tPA full recovery? Better than 12%?
  2. 30 day deaths? Better than competitors?
  3. rehab full recovery? Better than 10%?

Brilinta Boosts Secondary Stroke Prevention

— THALES trial supports addition to aspirin but comparison with clopidogrel now needed

A box of Brilinta over a photo of aspirin tablets
For acute ischemic strokes, early treatment with ticagrelor (Brilinta) and aspirin was better than aspirin alone for secondary prevention, the THALES trial showed.
In people with mild-to-moderate acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), the composite outcome of stroke or death in the 30 days after randomization favored a 30-day regimen of ticagrelor plus aspirin over aspirin alone (5.5% vs 6.6%, HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.96).
This was driven by fewer ischemic strokes (5.0% vs 6.3%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93), with no significant difference in mortality rates between groups (0.7% vs 0.5%, HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.81-2.19). Disability rates didn't differ significantly.
The dual antiplatelet group experienced more severe bleeding by GUSTO criteria (0.5% vs 0.1%, HR 3.99, 95% CI 1.74-9.14) and more intracranial hemorrhage (0.4% vs 0.1%, HR 3.33, 95% CI 1.34-8.28), reported the investigators, led by S. Claiborne Johnston, MD, PhD, of Dell Medical School of the University of Texas at Austin.
A full manuscript of the study was published in the July 16 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. Topline data were previously announced by trial sponsor AstraZeneca.
"The benefit from treatment with ticagrelor-aspirin as compared with aspirin alone would be expected to result in a number needed to treat of 92 to prevent one primary-outcome event and a number needed to harm of 263 for severe bleeding," the researchers concluded.
"Based on these results, plus the higher severe bleeding with ticagrelor, and greater expense, I don't think ticagrelor will replace clopidogrel [Plavix] as part of the dual antiplatelet regimen used after high risk TIA or minor stroke," commented James Grotta, MD, of Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center in Houston.
The CHANCE-2 trial directly comparing ticagrelor against clopidogrel as the add-on to aspirin is ongoing. Until then, it is "hard to compare" these drugs without a head-to-head comparison, Grotta said.
Nevertheless, the POINT and CHANCE studies suggested larger relative reductions in the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke with clopidogrel-aspirin compared to THALES' ticagrelor-aspirin, according to Peter Rothwell, MD, PhD, of University of Oxford, England, writing in an editorial.
Moreover, the risk in major bleeding was increased to a greater extent with the ticagrelor combination than the clopidogrel one, particularly with respect to intracranial hemorrhage, Rothwell continued.
Finally, clopidogrel-aspirin resulted in a significant reduction in risk of disabling or fatal stroke versus aspirin alone in a pooled analysis of the POINT and CHANCE trials, whereas ticagrelor-aspirin did not achieve the same in THALES, he noted.
Grotta said he would have expected the ticagrelor-aspirin combination to have produced greater benefit over aspirin than what was seen with clopidogrel-aspirin given the genetic polymorphism for clopidogrel response.
"Regardless of which combination of antiplatelet drugs is favored for the high-risk minority, all patients should receive aspirin immediately after TIA unless aspirin is contraindicated. Too many patients are sent home from emergency departments without this simple treatment that substantially reduces the risk and severity of early recurrent stroke," Rothwell urged.
THALES included 11,016 participants who presented with acute ischemic stroke (NIH Stroke Scale score 5 or less) or high-risk TIA at 414 sites in 28 countries who were not undergoing thrombolysis or thrombectomy.
People were randomized within 24 hours after symptom onset. They either received a 30-day regimen of ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, followed by 90 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (300-325 mg on the first day, followed by 75-100 mg daily) or matching placebo plus aspirin.
Baseline characteristics were similar between study arms. Mean age was 65 years, and 39% of the participants were women.
People already on aspirin before their index stroke or TIA accounted for 13% of the group.
Johnston and colleagues noted the limited generalizability of THALES to excluded populations, namely those with more severe strokes, cardioembolic strokes, and people who had treatment initiated more than 24 hours after symptom onset. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation were also excluded.
"The bleeding risk associated with ticagrelor and aspirin might exceed the benefit among lower-risk patients who make up the majority in practice, and so the current trial results should not be overgeneralized," Rothwell cautioned.
Ticagrelor was first approved by the FDA in 2011 for the indication of thrombotic event risk reduction in people with acute coronary syndrome.
Last month, the P2Y12 inhibitor won an expanded indication to reduce risk of a first heart attack or stroke in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.
  • author['full_name']
    Nicole Lou is a reporter for MedPage Today, where she covers cardiology news and other developments in medicine. Follow
Disclosures
The trial was funded by AstraZeneca, which also analyzed the data.
Johnston reported receiving an institutional grant from AstraZeneca.
Rothwell disclosed receiving personal fees from Bayer and BMS.

Wednesday, January 29, 2020

BRILINTA met primary endpoint in Phase III THALES trial in stroke

HOW LONG BEFORE THIS GETS TO A REHAB PROTOCOL IN YOUR HOSPITAL? I'm guessing decades, maybe in time for your children's and grandchildren's strokes. 

BRILINTA met primary endpoint in Phase III THALES trial in stroke


BRILINTA reduced the risk of the composite of stroke and
death after an acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack
High-level results from the Phase III THALES trial showed AstraZeneca’s BRILINTA (ticagrelor) 90 mg used twice daily and taken with aspirin for 30 days, reached a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in the risk of the primary composite endpoint of stroke and death, compared to aspirin alone.
THALES was conducted in over 11,000 patients who had a minor acute ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the 24 hours prior to treatment initiation. The preliminary safety findings in the THALES trial were consistent with the known profile of BRILINTA, with an increased bleeding rate in the treatment arm.
Mene Pangalos, Executive Vice President, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, said: “Results of the Phase III THALES trial showed BRILINTA, in combination with aspirin, improved outcomes in patients who had experienced a minor acute ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. We look forward to sharing the detailed results with health authorities.”
Dr. Clay Johnston, lead investigator for the THALES trial and Dean of the Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, said: “The risk of having a subsequent stroke is highest in the first few days and weeks after a minor acute ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. While an expected increase in bleeding was observed, the findings from THALES showed that BRILINTA, in combination with aspirin, reduced the risk of potentially devastating events in this crucial time.”
The full THALES trial results will be presented at a forthcoming medical meeting.
BRILINTA is not indicated in patients with minor acute ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack.
BRILINTA is indicated to reduce the rate of CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke in patients with ACS or a history of MI. For at least the first 12 months following ACS, it is superior to clopidogrel.
BRILINTA also reduces the rate of stent thrombosis in patients who have been stented for treatment of ACS.
Dosing: In the management of ACS, initiate BRILINTA treatment with a 180-mg loading dose. Administer 90 mg twice daily during the first year after an ACS event. After one year administer 60 mg twice daily. Use BRILINTA with a daily maintenance dose of aspirin of 75-100 mg.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION FOR BRILINTA® (ticagrelor) 60-MG AND 90-MG TABLETS
WARNING: (A) BLEEDING RISK, (B) ASPIRIN DOSE AND BRILINTA EFFECTIVENESS
A.  BLEEDING RISK
  • BRILINTA, like other antiplatelet agents, can cause significant, sometimes fatal bleeding
  • Do not use BRILINTA in patients with active pathological bleeding or a history of intracranial hemorrhage
  • Do not start BRILINTA in patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  • If possible, manage bleeding without discontinuing BRILINTA. Stopping BRILINTA increases the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events
B.  ASPIRIN DOSE AND BRILINTA EFFECTIVENESS
  • Maintenance doses of aspirin above 100 mg reduce the effectiveness of BRILINTA and should be avoided
CONTRAINDICATIONS
  • BRILINTA is contraindicated in patients with a history of intracranial hemorrhage or active pathological bleeding such as peptic ulcer or intracranial hemorrhage. BRILINTA is also contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity (eg, angioedema) to ticagrelor or any component of the product
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
  • Dyspnea was reported in about 14% of patients treated with BRILINTA, more frequently than in patients treated with control agents. Dyspnea resulting from BRILINTA is often self-limiting
  • Discontinuation of BRILINTA will increase the risk of MI, stroke, and death. When possible, interrupt therapy with BRILINTA for 5 days prior to surgery that has a major risk of bleeding. If BRILINTA must be temporarily discontinued, restart as soon as possible
  • Ticagrelor can cause ventricular pauses. Bradyarrhythmias including AV block have been reported in the post-marketing setting. PLATO and PEGASUS excluded patients at increased risk of bradyarrhythmias not protected by a pacemaker, and they may be at increased risk of developing bradyarrhythmias with ticagrelor
  • Avoid use of BRILINTA in patients with severe hepatic impairment. Severe hepatic impairment is likely to increase serum concentration of ticagrelor and there are no studies of BRILINTA in these patients
  • In patients with Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT): False negative results for HIT-related platelet functional tests, including the heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) assay, have been reported with BRILINTA. BRILINTA is not expected to impact PF4 antibody testing for HIT
ADVERSE REACTIONS
  • The most common adverse reactions associated with the use of BRILINTA included bleeding and dyspnea: In PLATO, for BRILINTA vs clopidogrel, non-CABG    PLATO-defined major bleeding (3.9% vs 3.3%) and dyspnea (14% vs 8%); in PEGASUS, BRILINTA vs aspirin alone, TIMI Total Major bleeding (1.7% vs 0.8%) and dyspnea (14% vs 6%)
DRUG INTERACTIONS
  • Avoid use with strong CYP3A inhibitors and strong CYP3A inducers. BRILINTA is metabolized by CYP3A4/5. Strong inhibitors substantially increase ticagrelor exposure and so increase the risk of adverse events. Strong inducers substantially reduce ticagrelor exposure and so decrease the efficacy of ticagrelor
  • As with other oral P2Y12 inhibitors, co-administration of opioid agonists delay and reduce the absorption of ticagrelor. Consider use of a parenteral anti-platelet in ACS patients requiring co-administration
  • Patients receiving more than 40 mg per day of simvastatin or lovastatin may be at increased risk of statin-related adverse events
  • Monitor digoxin levels with initiation of, or change in, BRILINTA therapy
SPECIAL POPULATIONS
  • Lactation: Breastfeeding not recommended
Please read full Prescribing Information, including Boxed WARNINGS, and Medication Guide.