Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases. Show all posts

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Unbalanced metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases ratios predict hemorrhagic transformation of lesion in ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolysis: results from the MAGIC study

Way out of my league, so you'll have to contact a genius somewhere to decipher this.
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2015.00121/full?
imageBenedetta Piccardi1*, imageVanessa Palumbo2, imageMascia Nesi2, imagePatrizia Nencini2, imageAnna Maria Gori3, imageBetti Giusti3, imageGiovanni Pracucci1, imagePaolina Tonelli1, imageEleonora Innocenti1, imageAlice Sereni3, imageElena Sticchi3, imageDanilo Toni4, imagePaolo Bovi5, imageMario Guidotti6, imageMaria Rosaria Tola7, imageDomenico Consoli8, imageGiuseppe Micieli9, imageRossana Tassi10, imageGiovanni Orlandi11, imageFrancesco Perini12, imageNorina Marcello13, imageAntonia Nucera14, imageFrancesca Massaro15, imageMaria Luisa DeLodovici16, imageGiorgio Bono16, imageMaria Sessa17, imageRosanna Abbate3 and imageDomenico Inzitari1,18, On behalf of the MAGIC Study Group
  • 1Neuroscience Section, Department of Neurofarba, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • 2Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
  • 3Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Atherothrombotic Diseases Center, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • 4Emergency Department Stroke Unit, Department of Neurological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • 5SSO Stroke Unit, U.O. Neurologia d.O., DAI di Neuroscienze, Azienda Ospedaliera Integrata, Verona, Italy
  • 6Neurology Unit, Valduce General Hospital, Como, Italy
  • 7U.O. Neurologia, DAI Neuroscienze-Riabilitazione, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria S. Anna, Ferrara, Italy
  • 8U.O. Neurologia, G. Jazzolino Hospital, Vibo Valentia, Italy
  • 9Istituto Neurologico Nazionale C. Mondino, Pavia, Italy
  • 10U.O.C. Stroke Unit, Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche e Neurosensoriali, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
  • 11Department of Neurosciences, Neurological Clinic, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • 12UOC di Neurologia e “Stroke Unit”, Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
  • 13Neurology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
  • 14Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
  • 15Neurology Unit, Misericordia e Dolce Hospital, Prato, Italy
  • 16Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
  • 17Department of Neurology, Istituti Ospitalieri, Cremona, Italy
  • 18Institute of Neuroscience, Italian National Research Council, Florence, Italy
Background: Experimentally, metalloproteinases (MMPs) play a detrimental role related to the severity of ischemic brain lesions. Both MMPs activity and function in tissues reflect the balance between MMPs and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). We aimed to evaluate the role of MMPs/TIMPs balance in the setting of rtPA-treated stroke patients.
Methods: Blood was taken before and 24-h after rtPA from 327 patients (mean age 68 years, median NIHSS 11) with acute ischemic stroke. Delta median values of each MMP/TIMP ratio [(post rtPA MMP/TIMP-baseline MMP/TIMP)/(baseline MMP/TIMP)] were analyzed related to symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) according to NINDS criteria, relevant hemorrhagic transformation (HT) defined as confluent petechiae within the infarcted area or any parenchymal hemorrhage, stroke subtypes (according to Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project) and 3-month death. The net effect of each MMP/TIMP ratio was estimated by a logistic regression model including major clinical determinants of outcomes
Results: Adjusting for major clinical determinants, only increase in MMP9/TIMP1 and MMP9/TIMP2 ratios remained significantly associated with sICH (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.67 [1.17–2.38], p = 0.005; 1.74 [1.21–2.49], p = 0.003, respectively). Only relative increase in MMP9/TIMP1 ratio proved significantly associated with relevant HT (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.74 [1.17–2.57], p = 0.006) with a trend toward significance for MMP9/TIMP2 ratio (p = 0.007).
Discussion: Our data add substantial clinical evidence about the role of MMPs/TIMPs balance in rtPA-treated stroke patients. These results may serve to generate hypotheses on MMPs inhibitors to be administered together with rtPA in order to counteract its deleterious effect.

Introduction

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases that are involved in extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation (1). The turnover of ECM is regulated by the balance between MMPs and a group of endogenous proteins called tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) (2). Active MMPs and some MMP proenzymes form 1:1 complexes with TIMPs and the unbalance between these two families of molecules appears implicated in a variety of diseases (3). A list of MMPs and TIMPs with their putative role in acute ischemic stroke is shown in Table S1 in Supplementary Material.
After cerebral ischemia, the general neuronal response to excitotoxic injury determines the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines that stimulate the local production of MMPs and TIMPs (4). In experimental models of brain ischemia, MMPs and MMP/TIMP unbalance play a detrimental role related to blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption leading to hemorrhagic transformation and edema of an ischemic brain lesion (5). Circulating levels of MMP9 have been proved associated with poor outcomes in stroke patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) (6, 7). Furthermore, recent studies suggest that rtPA adverse effects may be mediated through MMPs upregulation and activation (2). No clinical study has hitherto considered selectively the effect of the balance between MMPs and their physiological inhibitor related to stroke outcomes after thrombolysis. Theoretical effects of rtPA on MMP/TIMP unbalance have been shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org Figure 1. Impact of tissue plasminogen activator on MMP/TIMP unbalance at the neurovascular unit level. After acute ischemic stroke, rtPA may cross blood–brain barrier (BBB), enter the brain parenchyma, and thereby damage neurovascular unit components by promoting metalloproteinase (MMPs) production and activation. Indeed, unbalance between MMPs and their natural inhibitors (tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases, TIMPs) may exacerbate BBB disruption leading to hemorrhagic transformation and edema of an ischemic brain lesion.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MMPs/TIMPs ratio on outcomes of ischemic stroke in the same cohort of the biological markers associated with acute ischemic stroke (MAGIC) study. Because MMP inhibition is considered a possible therapeutic target for stroke patients (8), a clearer understanding of MMP/TIMP interplay, compared with the effect of MMPs only, would have important implications for acute stroke therapies.

More at link.