Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 29,316 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Tuesday, September 3, 2019
Rehabilitation is Initiated Early After Stroke, but Most Motor Rehabilitation Trials Are Not: A Systematic Review
Stroke is the third most common cause of death and the most common cause of acquired adult disability in developed countries.1 Motor impairment is common after stroke, and a critical factor influencing the patient’s ability to live independently.2,3 The neurobiological mechanisms of plasticity and spontaneous recovery during the initial days and weeks after stroke have been reasonably well characterized using animal models.4,5 These mechanisms include cell genesis, functional plasticity, and structural adaptations, such as axonal sprouting and synaptogenesis. The nature and time course of these mechanisms map onto the trajectory of motor recovery observed in human patients, most of whom reach their recovery plateau within 3 months of stroke.6,7 Rehabilitation is primarily delivered in this time period, to capitalize on the unique physiological conditions that prevail, and shape the spontaneous recovery process for the patient’s benefit. Recovery of function is likely to be enhanced by novel treatments that interact with and facilitate the underlying mechanisms of spontaneous recovery. A variety of neurorehabilitation techniques aimed at improving motor recovery after stroke have been developed and trialed over the past 3 decades. These include repetitive task training, biofeedback, constraint-induced movement therapy, robotics, virtual reality, motor imagery, noninvasive brain stimulation, and pharmacological agents.8,9 However, despite almost 1000 randomized control trials (RCTs) in stroke rehabilitation,10 there is very little translation of this evidence base into clinical practice.11,12 Research efforts to develop the evidence base are challenged by difficulties in recruiting patients, resulting in small sample sizes; the heterogeneity of impairments after stroke and the complexity of their interactions with factors affecting recovery; and limited collaboration between scientists, clinicians, patient groups, and industry.11 Even when the research evidence base supports the development of clinical guidelines, significant barriers to implementation remain.10,13 Reviews of stroke rehabilitation commonly identify the need to perform research in real-world clinical settings9,11; however, they do not routinely report the timing of RCTs with respect to stroke onset. Similarly, Cochrane reviews typically draw conclusions about the efficacy of an intervention based on RCTs performed at any time after stroke.14–19 These
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment