This is where our first world fucking failures of stroke associations need to create 100% recovery protocols so LMICs can emulate them. But that won't occur, our stroke medical 'professionals' have NO leadership skills whatsoever! The first inclination this is useless is 'guidelines'; NOT PROTOCOLS!
Perceived determinants of clinical practice guideline implementation for stroke rehabilitation in LMICs a multinational REFORM survey
Scientific Reports 15, Article number: 43120 (2025)
Abstract
Implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is integral to improving the quality of stroke rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, various barriers hinder their effective utilization. This survey aimed to identify the barriers faced by rehabilitation professionals in utilizing CPGs for post-stroke motor rehabilitation. A cross-sectional survey based on the Australian Living Guidelines for Stroke Rehabilitation was developed to identify factors that influence healthcare professionals’ adherence to clinical practice guidelines. The survey comprised 50 questions spanning five domains: demographics, work practices, rehabilitation techniques, clinical practice awareness, and CPG feasibility and implementation. A panel of 10 experts validated the questionnaire. The survey was disseminated via emails, through professional associations, and platforms such as WhatsApp, LinkedIn, and X (formerly Twitter). Quantitative analysis data were analysed using Jamovi 2.3.21. The results indicated that less experienced professionals were more likely to implement CPGs, utilize telerehabilitation, and follow transition care protocols, while experienced practitioners adhered to both CPGs and hospital guidelines and employed motor outcome measures. Identified barriers included limited awareness, insufficient training, resource constraints, and challenges related to language and cultural relevance. To enhance CPG implementation, it is necessary to develop context-specific CPGs, establish stepwise clinical protocols, integrate evidence-based practice and CPG training into university curricula, and increase awareness among policymakers and stroke survivors. Engaging diverse stakeholders—patients, caregivers, multidisciplinary teams, and policymakers—is essential to foster an enabling environment for CPG adoption and advancing stroke rehabilitation practices in LMICs.
Introduction
Over the past decade, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have witnessed a 42% rise in stroke incidence. This is significantly higher than in high-income countries, contributing disproportionately to the global burden of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) post stroke.1 This calls for an effective implementation of evidence-based interventions for stroke survivors, which is proven to improve quality of life.1,2
Motor rehabilitation, a subset of stroke rehabilitation, has been studied extensively in recent decades. It is defined “as a process that engages people with stroke to benefit their motor function, activity capacity and performance in daily life,” and is implemented using learning- and task-dependent mechanisms.3 Recognized as a critical component of the stroke rehabilitation pathway for individuals with movement deficits, it addresses both the ‘activity’ and ‘participation’ dimensions of the International Classification of Impairment, Disability, and Handicap model.3
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are systematically developed recommendations that not only serve to guide practice but have been shown to improve clinical outcomes post-stroke, reduce healthcare costs, and improve clinical decision-making and healthcare delivery while guiding future research.4,5,6 This has been recommended as an essential step in the process of motor rehabilitation post-stroke by the European Stroke Organization (ESO). Despite its proven importance, many LMIC settings lack well-established stroke care pathways and capacities for optimal stroke care.7 However, its uptake by rehabilitation professionals in many countries is often limited due to various perceived barriers.8,9,10,11,12 The most perceived barriers from HICs are the time-consuming nature of CPG implementation and the limited skilled workforce, which lacks familiarity with recommended treatments.10,11 Among LMICs, the challenges are numerous and multifaceted, notably being the lack of awareness of existing stroke rehabilitation guidelines, compounded by the poorly developed CPGs lacking methodological rigor and context-specificity further resulting in poor clinical implementability.12 Most CPGs for stroke rehabilitation from LMICs fail to include relevant stakeholders during their development, fail to reach the relevant target audience, and are not contextually relevant to the users, failing to integrate sociocultural and economic considerations11,12,13.
The WHO’s 2023 report consolidated global CPGs for stroke rehabilitation using the ‘Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation’ (AGREE) tool, included guidelines originated from HICs, except those from South Africa, without mentioning the process or the need to implement such evidence-based recommendations.13,14,15. In addition, Platz T 2019., noted that the large evidence base does not directly aid practice recommendations, leaving clinicians with questions regarding its implementation in clinical practice.14 These findings, highlighting the need for contextualization of existing CPGs for use in low-resource settings were reported in 2024 by the Global Consortium of Stroke rehabilitation-serving low-resource settings.15 Similarly, the Lancet Neurology Commission, with the World Stroke Organisation and the International Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Alliance, recommends contextualizing and implementing CPGs according to the regional needs to effectively practice Evidence-Based Practice (EBP).13
Implementing CPGs is a priority to optimise the quality of stroke rehabilitation delivery in LMICs. This would require understanding the gaps and user perspectives in the use of CPGs among rehabilitation professionals in these regions. The findings of this survey could then inform targeted solutions for better uptake of CPGs among rehabilitation professionals. Focusing on post-stroke motor rehabilitation, the survey aimed to explore the barriers to utilizing CPGs among rehabilitation professionals in LMICs. The paper explains the methodology, including the design and implementation of a questionnaire, data analysis, and results thereof.
No comments:
Post a Comment