Deans' stroke musings: Shoulder and elbow muscle activity during fully supported trajectory tracking in people who have had a stroke

Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, April 16, 2022

Shoulder and elbow muscle activity during fully supported trajectory tracking in people who have had a stroke

Well you described something, but I see nothing produced from here that is going to do survivors one fucking bit of good.

Shoulder and elbow muscle activity during fully supported trajectory tracking in people who have had a stroke

A.M. Hughes a,*,

C.T. Freeman b,

J.H. Burridge a,

P.H. Chappell b,

P.L. Lewin b,

E. Rogers b
a School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
b School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

abstract

An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem for stroke patients. This paper provides an insight into mechanisms associated with recovery of upper limb function by examining how stroke participants’ upper limb muscle activation patterns differ from those of neurologically intact participants, and how they change in response to an intervention.In this study, ﬁve chronic stroke participants undertook nine tracking tasks in which trajectory (orientation and length), speed and resistance to movement were varied. During these tasks, EMG signals were recorded from triceps, biceps, anterior deltoid, upper, middle and lower trapezius and pectoralis major.Data collection was performed in sessions both before, and after, an intervention in which participants performed a similar range of tracking tasks with the addition of responsive electrical stimulation applied to their triceps muscle. The intervention consisted of eighteen one hour treatment sessions, with two participants attending an additional seven sessions. During all sessions, each participant’s arm was supported by a hinged arm holder which constrained their hand to move in a two dimensional plane.Analysis of the pre intervention EMG data showed that timing and amplitude of peak EMG activity for all stroke participants differed from neurologically intact participants. Analysis of post intervention EMG data revealed that statistically signiﬁcant changes in these quantities had occurred towards those of neu-rologically intact participants.