Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, August 20, 2022

Thrombectomy may benefit patients with pre-stroke disability, more research needed

You better not have any pre-stroke disability because your doctors may not know what to do.

Thrombectomy may benefit patients with pre-stroke disability, more research needed

Although thrombectomy was linked with improved functional recovery in patients with pre-stroke disability, it might also increase the risk for survival with significant disability, according to a study in JAMA Network Open.

“Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide,” Maximilian I. Sprugel, MD, of the department of neurology at Frederick Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany, and colleagues wrote. “Acute treatment strategies have greatly advanced in recent years, with thrombectomy and intravenous thrombolysis leading to rapid reperfusion and reduced disability.”

Image of brain with ischemic stroke
Source: Adobe Stock.

With uncertainty surrounding the benefits of thrombectomy in patients with pre-stroke disability, Sprugel and fellow researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the procedure in patients with large vessel occlusion and pre-stroke disability (modified Rankin Scale score 3 or 4).

The cohort study included 205 participants (72.7% women; median age, 82 years) who were admitted to a single tertiary care center between January 2006, and June 2019, of whom 102 received thrombectomy and 103 were non-surgical controls. Outcomes of interest included functional recovery at a 90-day follow-up, defined as clinical recovery to functional status prior to onset of stroke, and functional dependency, mortality, early neurologic improvement and recanalization.

According to results, functional recovery was reported in 19.6% of thrombectomy patients at 90 days and 7.8% of controls (adjusted difference = 9.4%; 95% CI, 2.2-16.7). The rate of functional dependency did not differ significantly between the two groups, with researchers reporting the outcome in 27.5% of thrombectomy patients and 18.4% of controls (AD = 8.9%; 95% CI, 2.5 to 20.2).

Data additionally revealed the rate of functional recovery after thrombectomy was 44% for patients with early neurologic improvement within 7 days, 29.4% for patients with small infarct volume (<50 mL) and 7% for patients with large infarct volume and without early neurologic improvement.

“Thrombectomy was associated with improved functional recovery in patients with pre-stroke disability. However, intervention-associated benefits were small and thrombectomy might increase the risk of survival with substantial disability,” Sprugel and colleagues wrote. “Further research is needed to assess both benefits and harms of the intervention.”

No comments:

Post a Comment