https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/06/02/stanford-researchers-stunned-by-stem-cell-experiment-that-helped-stroke-patient-walk/
Nothing here gives me any sense of hope
that stem cells work. They have NO fucking clue if the stem cells even
survived and migrated to the correct locations.
1. No reference to how many growth factors were created.
2. Nothing on the objective damage in the brain.
3. No specification of what scale was used for measurement so we could tell how objective it was.
4. Nothing listed here proves cause and effect.
I really do wonder if our researchers even know how to run research.
I could make just as strong a case that the the real cause of the improvement was the trepanation.
 |
| Healed over trepanation, notice the rounded edges |
Stanford researchers studying the effect of stem cells injected
directly into the brains of stroke patients said Thursday that they were
"stunned" by the extent to which the experimental treatment restored
motor function in some of the patients. While the research involved
only 18 patients and was designed primarily to look at the safety of
such a procedure and not its effectiveness, it is creating
significant buzz in the neuroscience community because the
results appear to contradict a core belief about brain damage — that it
is permanent and irreversible.
The results, published in the journal
Stroke, could
have implications for our understanding of an array of disorders
including traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury and Alzheimer's if
confirmed in larger-scale testing.
The work involved patients who
had passed the critical six-month mark when recoveries generally
plateau and there are rarely further improvements. This is the point at
which therapies are typically stopped as brain circuits are thought to
be dead and unable to be repaired. Each participant in the study had
suffered a stroke beneath the brain’s outermost layer and had
significant impairments in moving their arms and-or legs. Some
participants in the study had had a stroke as long as three to five
years before the experimental treatment.
The
one-time therapy involved surgeons drilling a hole into the study
participants' skulls and injecting stem cells in several locations
around the area damaged by the stroke. These stem cells were harvested
from the bone marrow of adult donors. While the procedure sounds
dramatic, it is considered relatively simple as far as brain surgery
goes. The patients were conscious the whole time and went home the same
day.
They suffered minimal adverse effects such as temporary
headaches, nausea and vomiting. One patient experienced some fluid
buildup from the procedure that had to be drained but recovered fully
from the issue. The volunteers were then tested at one month, six and 12
months after surgery using brain imaging and several standard scales
that look at speech, vision, motor ability and other aspects of daily
functioning.
Gary Steinberg, the study's lead author and chair of neurosurgery at
Stanford, said in an interview that while he is cautious
about "overselling" the results of such a small study, his team has
been "stunned" that seven of the 18 patients experienced significant
improvement in their abilities following treatment.
"Their
recovery was not just a minimal recovery like someone who couldn't move
a thumb now being able to wiggle it. It was much more meaningful. One
71-year-old wheelchair-bound patient was walking again," said Steinberg,
who personally performed most of the surgeries.
He also
recounted the progress of a much younger patient, age 39, who was two
years post-stroke and had had such problems walking and speaking that
she "did not want to get married to her boyfriend." "She was embarrassed
about walking down the aisle," he explained. But after treatment,
Steinberg said, "She's now walking much better and talking much better
and she's married and pregnant."
Steinberg said that the study
does not support the idea that the injected stem cells become neurons,
as has been previously thought. Instead, it suggests that they seem to
trigger some kind of biochemical process that enhances the brain's
ability to repair itself.
"A theory is that they turn the adult brain into the neonatal brain that recovers well," he explained.
Sean
Savitz, a professor of neurosurgery at the University of Texas, said he
was encouraged by the study but said there is a lot more work to be
done to try to confirm the results and figure out the mechanism for the
reaction. One major question, he said, is whether there is
something about the stem cells that is stimulating the changes or
whether it is simply the procedure itself inducing some other sort of
biological reaction or a placebo effect.
Nicholas Boulis, a
neurosurgeon and researcher at Emory University, said the study appears
to support the idea that there may be latent pathways in the brain that
can be reactivated — a theory that has been "working its way to the
surface" over the past few years.