Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 33,305 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Sunday, March 30, 2025
Effects of vestibular rehabilitation and dual-task training on balance and gait in sub-acute and chronic stroke survivors
Sunday, September 6, 2020
The Effects of Vestibular Rehabilitation on Gait Performance in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
You'll have to ask your doctor what the hell vestibular rehabilitation is.
The Effects of Vestibular Rehabilitation on Gait Performance in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Highlights
- •
This review found a beneficial effect of vestibular rehabilitation for stroke.
- •
We cannot make definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of rehabilitation.
- •
More high quality large-scale RCTs after stroke are needed.(So you didn't do the research properly?)
Abstract
Background:
Patients with post stroke hemiparesis have poor postural stability; nevertheless, it is unclear whether vestibular rehabilitation affects gait performance after a stroke or not. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to investigate the effects of vestibular rehabilitation on gait performance in patients with post stroke.
Methods:
The Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were comprehensively searched. All literature published from each source's earliest date to June 2019 was included. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by paired reviewers. Outcomes of gait performance were the 10-Meter Walking Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Dynamic Gait Index. We applied the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale to evaluate the risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system to evaluate the quality of a body of evidence.
Results:
Three studies were included, and two out of three trials showed beneficial effects of vestibular rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Quality assessment using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria found very low-quality evidence of all included studies due to inadequate allocation concealment, low participant numbers, and lack of blinding.
Conclusion:
This review found beneficial effects of vestibular rehabilitation on gait performance in patients with stroke. However, due to the very low-quality evidence of previous randomized controlled trials as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria, definitive conclusions on the effectiveness of vestibular rehabilitation cannot be made. Hence, more high-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials of vestibular rehabilitation after stroke are needed.
Saturday, December 7, 2019
Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy versus Dual Task Training on Balance and Gait in Posterior Cerebral Artery (PCA) Stroke
So VRT is more effective but you didn't write up a protocol on it, so completely useless. Didn't your mentors and senior researchers tell you the only goal of stroke research is rehab protocols leading to 100% recovery? They were that incompetent? Did you account for this possibly being the Hawthorne effect?
Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy versus Dual Task Training on Balance and Gait in Posterior Cerebral Artery (PCA) Stroke
- Source: Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research . Nov2019, Vol. 13 Issue 11, p10-17. 8p.
- Author(s): SALEEM, SANA; ARORA, BHARTI; CHAUHAN, PRIYA
Abstract:
- Introduction: Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy (VRT) and Dual Task (DT) training are rehabilitation approaches increasingly used in the care of stroke patients to improve balance and gait, although no comparative evidence has been provided for their efficacy. Aim: The study was aimed to compare the effectiveness of vestibular rehabilitation therapy versus dual task training on balance and gait in posterior cerebral artery stroke. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 subjects i.e., subacute Posterior Cerebral Arterystroke individuals were randomly assigned into 2 groups, group A Vestibular Rehabilitation with Conventional Therapy (n=15) and group B DT training (n=15). Each group received treatment for 45 minutes in a day, 3 times in a week for 4 weeks. Both the groups A and B were also given Conventional Physiotherapy treatment comprising of stretching, strengthening and stability exercises, over the period for 5 days for 4 weeks. Participants were assisted with Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS) to assess the performance of gait and Mini-BEST test to assess the balance. Mean change score were calculated as the difference between post and pre-test scores and an independent t-test was used to test the difference in the changed scores between two groups. Paired t-test was used to analyse within group differences. A level of significance was set at p≤0.05. Results: The comparison of post intervention scores of Mini- BESTest between Group A and Group B showed significant difference (t-value=2.577, p-value=0.018). The comparison of post intervention scores of WGS between Group A and Group B showed significant difference (t-value= -2.356, p-value=0.028). So, result showed that Group A (Vestibular Rehabilitation) was more significant as compared to Group B (DT training) in both Mini-BESTest and WGS.
- Conclusion: The result of this study is encouraging to use VRT as a part of rehabilitation protocol by alleviating their gait disturbances, improving balance and gaining confidence of walking with PCA stroke patients as compared with DT Training.
- Copyright of Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research is the property of JCDR Research & Publications Private Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.

