Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label tracking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tracking. Show all posts

Monday, September 5, 2016

Bart Starr returns to Tijuana for stem cells

Right now I would have to say stem cell therapy is complete quackery. I have seen nothing that even comes close to proving that it works or even if the stem cells survived.  Be careful out there.
The unasked question. 'What proof have your doctors given you that these stem cells caused your improvement?' Without that answer, this is all just placebo and magic. If the stem cell company or researchers you are following don't mention tracking of stem cells then they have NO fucking clue if they survive or not.

What should be used to check the health of stem cells: 

Tracking of Administered Progenitor Cells in Brain Injury and Stroke by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The problems that can occur:

Donor-derived brain tumor following neural stem cell transplantation in an ataxia telangiectasia patient.

He went abroad for stem cell treatment. Now he’s a cautionary tale. Stroke patient Jim Gass

And the credulous article on Bart Starr:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2016/09/05/bart-starr-returns-tijuana-stem-cells/89881768/ 
Wearing a sporty black Green Bay Packers polo shirt, Bart Starr got off of a private jet here last week and walked into the California sunshine.
This was quite a feat. Starr, 82, had suffered two strokes and a heart attack in 2014, followed by a bronchial infection that nearly killed him in 2015 and then a broken hip that put him back in a wheelchair in December.
Just a few weeks ago, the legendary former Packers quarterback even underwent surgery to remove stones from his bladder.
Yet here he was again, on his feet and smiling after flying in for another round of experimental stem cell treatments 20 miles south of here, in Tijuana, Mexico.
“Three times,” Starr interjected when asked by USA TODAY Sports about his visits here since June 2015.
“We’re really looking for big things to happen with this visit because this is probably the healthiest Bart’s been in two years,” said Cherry Starr, Bart’s wife.
Cherry Starr believes her husband has bounced back from his health setbacks with help from these treatments, the same kind of treatments received by two other famous stroke victims: hockey great Gordie Howe and former NFL MVP quarterback John Brodie.
The treatments involve a combination of stem cells derived from donated bone marrow and fetal brain tissue. They are manufactured by a company in San Diego, Stemedica, but they are not approved for use in the USA.
To gain such approval, they first would have to pass years of expensive tests on their safety and effectiveness.
But Brodie, 81, Starr and Howe, who died in June, didn’t believe they had time to wait. They also believed they had little to lose by going to Mexico, where the company has said it’s more cost-effective to have its products tested than in the USA. Stemedica ships the cells to a sleek, modern clinic in an old, run-down part of Tijuana, not far from various dental clinics and a taco restaurant.
“When I first went down there, I didn’t really know what to expect,” Cherry Starr said Thursday after returning home to Alabama. “I thought,`Oh my gosh, what are we getting into?’ when we were driving through town. But it’s a lovely, lovely facility.”
Clinica Santa Clarita in Tijuana has had about 250 patients take part in its clinical trial over the past two years. Patients are often charged for these experimental treatments, which cost $30,000. Bart Starr also paid for his treatment, Cherry said.
His treatment involved an injection of fetal-derived neural cells into his spine last week, followed by an injection of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells into his arm the next day.
Afterward, Cherry Starr said “everything went absolutely great” but that it was too early to notice any possible effects. Bart Starr, a Pro Football Hall of Famer, can walk slowly and usually with help at his sides. His speech also is limited, but it’s still a big improvement from being wheelchair-bound and barely able to feed himself after his stroke two years ago.
“Stem cells, wow!” said Brodie, who greeted Starr here Tuesday and is a former rival of Starr’s as quarterback of the San Francisco 49ers.
American stem cell experts stress caution about such treatments, either in the USA or especially in other countries where safety and effectiveness standards might not be as strict. For example, it’s not known how much Starr, Brodie or Howe improved on their own through natural healing or physical therapy.
Larry Goldstein, a stem cell expert and professor at the University of California San Diego, said it takes at least five to 10 years to test whether such treatments really work. In the meantime, few stem cell treatments are approved for use in the USA, though many American clinics have been offering legally and scientifically questionable stem cell treatments derived from a patient’s own fat or bone marrow.
Stemedica’s stem cells are different than these because they are derived from donors and are replicated in a lab. They are considered unapproved biological drugs in the USA.
“There is definitely a wild west of clinics in the U.S. and outside the U.S. offering unproven treatments of stem cells,” Goldstein told USA TODAY Sports in June.
Stemedica is working toward approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, including with a clinical trial in Toledo for traumatic brain injury patients. It involves bone marrow-derived cells and is part of the Gordie Howe Initiative, named after perhaps the most famous stem cell patient in America. Before his death at age 88, his family credited the Tijuana treatments with boosting the last year and a half of his life after his stroke.
On Aug. 29, a subsidiary of Stemedica announced that data from a separate, pre-clinical study showed that its bone marrow-derived stem cells improved heart function after heart attacks.
“We’ve always known that our stem cells exhibit unique qualities and characteristics, and we’re very proud of what people call the `anecdotal evidence’ coming from patient testimonials,” said Dave McGuigan, Stemedica’s vice president for marketing and business development. “But now that we can give the academic and scientific community statistical evidence to go alongside the anecdotal meaningful evidence, that can only help add to the Stemedica story.”
Follow sports reporter Brent Schrotenboer on Twitter @Schrotenboer. E-mail: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Recent progress in tracking the viability of transplanted stem cells in vivo

If the stem cell company or researchers you are following don't mention tracking of stem cells then they have NO fucking clue if they survive or not. You can attribute that to laziness or fraud, but regardless not doing so is incompetent.
http://phys.org/news/2016-05-tracking-viability-transplanted-stem-cells.html
Noninvasive cell-tracking methods are indispensable for assessing the safety and efficacy of stem-cell based therapy. Thus, the research of noninvasive cell-tracking methods for determining in vivo the translocation and long-term viability of the transplanted stem cells have received considerable attention. A recent review article summarized the recent progress in tracking the viability of the transplanted stem cells in vivo.

In the article coauthored with S. Lin, G. Chen, D. Huang, C. Meng, and Q. Wang, scholars at Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and College of Biological Science and Technology, Fuzhou University summarized the current methods for tracking the viability of the transplanted stem cells in vivo, including reporter-gene based methods, exogenous contrast label-based methods and multimodel imaging methods.

In recent decades, stem cell-based regenerative medicine has attracted intense attention and extraordinary expectation due to its potentials in the treatment of numerous major diseases, such as hepatic, cardiac, pulmonary, renal and neurological diseases.

Knowing the viability, distribution and differentiation of the transplanted stem cells in vivo is a prerequisite for better understanding the role of stem cells playing in the therapeutic process, in which the survival report of the transplanted stem cells in vivo is particularly crucial in determining the success of stem cell-based regenerative medicine. Therefore, the development of non-invasive imaging methods that can monitor the viability of the transplanted stem cells in situ is urgently needed.

In this article, the authors summarized the development history of stem cell-tracking imaging techniques, explained the imaging principles, pros and cons underlying these techniques, and provided an overview of the applications of these techniques in animal models or humans. Furthermore, this review provided a guideline for researchers to select the right tracking method for the right study. Finally, this review discussed the current challenges in tracking the viability of transplanted stem cells, and emphasized the promise of the combined NIR-II fluorescence imaging/BLI method and MRI/PET method for further applications in high-throughput cell therapy screening in animal models and safe imaging in clinical trials, respectively.

Explore further: Researchers track neural stem cells by coloring chicken eggs from the inside

More information: SuYing LIN et al. Progress of tracking the viability of transplanted stem cells, Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) (2016). DOI: 10.1360/N972015-01404


Image at link.



Noninvasive cell-tracking methods are indispensable for assessing the safety and efficacy of stem-cell based therapy. Thus, the research of noninvasive cell-tracking methods for determining in vivo the translocation and long-term viability of the transplanted stem cells have received considerable attention. A recent review article summarized the recent progress in tracking the viability of the transplanted stem cells in vivo.
In the article coauthored with S. Lin, G. Chen, D. Huang, C. Meng, and Q. Wang, scholars at Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and College of Biological Science and Technology, Fuzhou University summarized the current methods for tracking the of the in vivo, including reporter-gene based methods, exogenous contrast label-based methods and multimodel imaging methods.
In recent decades, stem cell-based regenerative medicine has attracted intense attention and extraordinary expectation due to its potentials in the treatment of numerous major diseases, such as hepatic, cardiac, pulmonary, renal and neurological diseases.
Knowing the viability, distribution and differentiation of the transplanted stem cells in vivo is a prerequisite for better understanding the role of stem cells playing in the therapeutic process, in which the survival report of the transplanted stem cells in vivo is particularly crucial in determining the success of stem cell-based regenerative medicine. Therefore, the development of non-invasive imaging methods that can monitor the viability of the transplanted stem cells in situ is urgently needed.
In this article, the authors summarized the development history of stem cell-tracking imaging techniques, explained the imaging principles, pros and cons underlying these techniques, and provided an overview of the applications of these techniques in animal models or humans. Furthermore, this review provided a guideline for researchers to select the right tracking method for the right study. Finally, this review discussed the current challenges in tracking the viability of transplanted , and emphasized the promise of the combined NIR-II fluorescence imaging/BLI method and MRI/PET method for further applications in high-throughput cell therapy screening in animal models and safe imaging in clinical trials, respectively.
More information: SuYing LIN et al. Progress of tracking the viability of transplanted stem cells, Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) (2016). DOI: 10.1360/N972015-01404


Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-05-tracking-viability-transplanted-stem-cells.html#jCp

Thursday, May 21, 2015

Tracking of Administered Progenitor Cells in Brain Injury and Stroke by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

If your stem cell provider isn't tracking the cells they inject then they have no f*cking idea if they survived and are doing any good at all. This is why I don't trust any statements about Gordie Howe. They have absolutely no idea if the stem cells even lived. Any clinical research that doesn't include tracking should never even get funded.
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-15063-5_12
$29.95 / €24.95 / £19.95 *
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Get Access

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury and stroke remain important causes of chronic neurologic morbidity due to the lack of vasculature in injured brain. Promising data from preclinical and clinical studies suggest that transplantation of exogenous hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and neural progenitor cells (NPCs) has therapeutic potential for boosting brain repair. This neuroregeneration could be achieved by HSCs/NPCs migration, differentiation, enhanced endogenous angiogenesis and neurogenesis, and the secretion of trophic factors by these cells in injured tissue and stroke. The neuroregeneration is achieved by significant decrease in graft-versus-host disease and improved functional behavior of damaged brain. Importantly, these stem cells are derived from peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood (UCB), bone marrow (BM), and embryonic sources. A subpopulation of CD34+ human HSCs identified by the cell-surface molecule AC133 (CD133) has been shown to be more specific for endothelial differentiation and vascular repair. Similarly, NPCs have shown to induced angiogenesis and neurogenesis in stroke. Several studies have been exploited in vivo imaging modalities, importantly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor the migration and engraftment efficacy of administered cells for cell-based therapies. This chapter covers the characterization of contrast agents, cell-labeling methods for MRI, use of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and NPCs in vascular integrity and neuroregeneration, and molecular mechanisms of their homing to the injured or stroke site, such as their interaction with brain endothelium as depicted by MRI.

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Rice researchers use Bismuth to track stem cells

Ask your researchers how they know the stem cells they are inserting into the brain are ending up in the right location. Do they even know where that correct location is?
http://www.stemcellsfreak.com/2013/09/bismuth-stem-cells.html