Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label useless research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label useless research. Show all posts

Friday, July 11, 2025

Sex-specific hemoglobin thresholds and longitudinal trajectories in intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes: a multicenter cohort study

Does anything here get survivors recovered? NO? So, useless!


Sex-specific hemoglobin thresholds and longitudinal trajectories in intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes: a multicenter cohort study


Abstract

Background

We aim to investigate the association between admission hemoglobin and outcomes after primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), including 3-month outcome and long-term survival and recurrence.

Methods

Utilizing a multicenter stroke registry database, we retrospectively analyzed patients with spontaneous ICH confirmed within 48 h of symptom onset who had admission hemoglobin measurements and baseline neuroimaging. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to evaluate associations between admission hemoglobin levels and risks of all-cause mortality and ICH recurrence during follow-up. Nonlinear relationships were assessed using threshold effect models with inflection point determination. Sensitivity analyses were restricted to patients who underwent repeated routine blood testing during hospitalization to examine whether increased hemoglobin levels during hospitalization correlated with improved clinical outcomes.

Results

The cohort comprised 2,407 patients (mean age 64 ± 14 years; 65.1% male) with spontaneous ICH, followed for a median duration of 2.0 years (IQR 0.8–3.2). Threshold analysis revealed a nonlinear L-shaped association between admission hemoglobin and mortality. Below 14.3 g/dL, hemoglobin elevation correlated with reduced mortality risk (adjusted HR 0.88 per 1-g/dL increase, 95% CI 0.81–0.95). Above this threshold, no significant association was observed (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.98–1.31). Lower admission hemoglobin was independently associated with higher ICH recurrence risk (HR 0.88 per 1-g/dL decrease, 95% CI 0.775–0.998). In sensitivity analyses of 954 patients with serial hemoglobin measurements, improved 3-month functional outcomes and reduced long-term mortality were observed in patients with longitudinal elevation during hospitalization.

Conclusions

Admission hemoglobin demonstrates a L-shaped association with post-ICH mortality, with inflection point observed near 14.3 g/dL. Lower hemoglobin independently predicts higher hemorrhage recurrence risk. Longitudinal hemoglobin elevation during hospitalization correlates with improved functional outcomes and survival.

Trial registration

Clinical trials NCT06548737 (retrospectively registered)

Key points

What is already known on this topic

Prior studies in general acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke) populations describe a U-shaped association between hemoglobin levels and mortality. However, thresholds specific to ICH outcomes remain undefined, particularly in sex-specific contexts.

What this study adds

Based on a multi-center cohort with 2.0 (IQR 0.8–3.2) years of follow-up, we found a baseline hemoglobin level of at least 14.3 g/dL was associated with better prognosis (3-month outcome, and long-term survival and ICH prevention) of patients. Improved 3-month functional outcomes and reduced long-term mortality were observed in patients with longitudinal elevation during hospitalization.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy

Managing the hemoglobin level in the acute phase after ICH could be a possible treatment therapy.

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Low-Frequency Stimulation More Efficient Than Kilohertz-Frequency in Stroke Rehabilitation: Study

 Where EXACTLY IS THE PROTOCOL LOCATION? No location, absolutely fucking useless research! I'd have you all fired, including your mentors and senior researchers! A lot of dead wood needs to be removed in stroke so survivors will get useful research to 100% recovery!

Low-Frequency Stimulation More Efficient Than Kilohertz-Frequency in Stroke Rehabilitation: Study

Monday, March 10, 2025

Therapists' perspectives on an interdisciplinary approach of arm-hand rehabilitation in cervical spinal cord injury: a qualitative study

 My conclusion is you're COMPLETELY MISSING THE ONLY GOAL IN STROKE: 100% RECOVERY! And that requires EXACT PROTOCOLS!

My second conclusion is you don't understand ONE GODDAMN THING ABOUT SURVIVOR MOTIVATION, DO YOU? You create EXACT 100% recovery protocols and your survivor will be motivated to do the millions of reps needed because they are looking forward to 100% recovery. GET THERE!

There would be no need for this useless research.

Therapists' perspectives on an interdisciplinary approach of arm-hand rehabilitation in cervical spinal cord injury: a qualitative study

Authors:
Nele Bertels
Barbara Piškur
Yvonne Janssen-Potten

Abstract

Purpose: 

To explore therapists’ experiences on what elements arm-hand rehabilitation should contain, their importance, and the information needed to apply them in clinical practice. 

Materials and methods: 

This qualitative study, with an exploratory approach, used focus group discussions with purposive sampling. Based on Braun and Clarke’s methodology, inductive thematic analysis was employed to develop themes, subthemes, and categories. The study included seven physiotherapists and seven occupational (≥2 year experience) therapists from three spinal cord rehabilitation wards in Belgium and the Netherlands. 

Results: 

The data analysis revealed five major themes, i.e., gathering knowledge, the process of thinking and acting, practice beyond therapy, and motivation. The first theme involves collecting information about the person and their client system. The second focuses on the goal-setting process for a patient-tailored therapy plan, described in the third theme as goal task-oriented with an individualized therapy dose. The fourth theme highlights meaningful activities to enhance performance beyond therapy, while the fifth emphasizes maintaining motivation through rehabilitation. 

Conclusion: 

Therapists highlight centralizing the person and their social environment in arm-hand rehabilitation, leading to a personalized goal-setting process and a patient-tailored therapy plan incorporating meaningful tasks. This approach can increase therapy dose and improve patients’ motivation.(See my remarks above.)

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

Predictive Model for Estimating the Risk of Epilepsy After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

 Why the fuck are you uselessly predicting this rather than doing the research that will prevent it from happening?  We already know about the risk. I'd fire you all including your mentors and senior researchers!

Predictive Model for Estimating the Risk of Epilepsy After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage


The RISE Score


  • Abstract

    Background and Objectives

    The occurrence of seizures after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with a poorer functional and cognitive prognosis and less favorable quality of life. It would be of value to promptly identify patients at risk of epilepsy to optimize follow-up protocols and design preventive strategies. Our aim was to develop a predictive score to help stratify epilepsy risk in patients with aSAH.

    Methods

    This is a retrospective, longitudinal study of all adults with aSAH admitted to our center (2012–2021). We collected demographic data, clinical and radiologic variables, data on early-onset seizures (EOSs), and data on development of epilepsy. Exclusion criteria were previous structural brain lesion, epilepsy, and ≤7 days' follow-up. Multiple Cox regression was used to evaluate factors independently associated with unprovoked remote seizures (i.e., epilepsy). The best fitting regression model was used to develop a predictive score. Performance was evaluated in an external validation cohort of 308 patients using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis.

    Results

    From an initial database of 743 patients, 419 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The mean age was 60 ± 14 years, 269 patients (64%) were women, and 50 (11.9%) developed epilepsy within a median follow-up of 4.2 years. Premorbid modified Rankin Score (mRS) (hazard ratio [HR] 4.74 [1.8–12.4], p = 0.001), VASOGRADE score (HR 2.45 [1.4–4.2], p = 0.001), surgical treatment (HR 2.77 [1.6–4.9], p = 0.001), and presence of EOSs (HR 1.84 [1.0–3.4], p = 0.05) were independently associated with epilepsy. The proposed scale, designated RISE, scores 1 point for premorbid mRS ≥ 2 (R), VASOGRADE-Yellow (I, Ischemia), surgical intervention (S), and history of EOSs (E) and 2 points for VASOGRADE-Red. RISE stratifies patients into 3 groups: low (0–1), moderate (2–3), and high (4–5) risk (2.9%, 20.8%, and 75.7% developed epilepsy, respectively). On validation in a cohort from a different tertiary care center (N = 308), the new scale yielded a similar risk distribution and good predictive power for epilepsy within 5 years after aSAH (area under the curve [AUC] 0.82; 95% CI 0.74–0.90).

    Discussion

    The RISE scale is a robust predictor of post-SAH epilepsy with immediate clinical applicability. In addition to facilitating personalized diagnosis and treatment, RISE may be of value for exploring future antiepileptogenesis strategies.

    Get full access to this article