Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label tPA delivery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tPA delivery. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Prourokinase vs Standard Care for Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke

 Safety concerns could easily be eliminated by this. No definition of mild stroke so bad research.

You wouldn't have to worry about hemorrhages if you vastly reduced the bolus by delivering it via magnetic nanoparticles. Or are you FUCKING INCOMPETENT in not knowing about that?

We should have been using magnetic nanoparticles to deliver tPA for years. Then you wouldn't have to waste money on research like this.

Maybe this solution from March, 2015

Magnetic nanoparticles could stop blood clot-caused strokes

Or this from May, 2012

Future of med devices: Nanorobots in your blood stream 

Send me hate mail on this: oc1dean@gmail.com. I'll print your complete statement with your name and my response in my blog. Or are you afraid to engage with my stroke-addled mind? No excuses are allowed! You're medically trained; it should be simple to precisely refute all my points with NO EXCUSES!! And what is your definition of competence in stroke? Swearing at me is allowed, I'll return the favor. Don't even attempt to use that brain research is hard.

The latest here:

Prourokinase vs Standard Care for Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke

Key Points

Question  Does intravenous prourokinase benefit patients with ischemic stroke presenting with minor neurologic deficits?

Findings  In this randomized clinical trial that included 1446 patients with acute ischemic stroke, there was no significant difference in excellent functional outcome at 90 days between those treated with prourokinase vs standard care.

Meaning  Results demonstrate that prourokinase was not superior to standard care for the treatment of patients with mild ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours after symptom onset.

Abstract

Importance  Trials have not demonstrated superiority of alteplase or tenecteplase vs standard care in patients with mild stroke and have raised safety concerns. Prourokinase is an alternative fibrinolytic that may have a favorable safety profile, and the benefit-risk profile of prourokinase in mild stroke is unknown.

Objective  To investigate the efficacy and safety of prourokinase in mild ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, blinded–end point randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2022 through December 2023 with 3 months of follow-up. The trial was conducted at 89 hospitals in China. Patients with a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 5 or less (scores range from 0-42, with higher scores indicating more severe neurological deficit) within 4.5 hours from the time the patient was last known to be well. Patients with intention to proceed to endovascular treatment were excluded.

Interventions  Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive prourokinase, 35 mg (15-mg bolus + 20-mg infusion over 30 minutes) or standard care, including antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, at the discretion of local investigators.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 (range, 0-6, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at day 90. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death.

Results  Of 3836 patients who underwent screening, 1446 (37.7%) were enrolled in the trial. Median (IQR) age was 65.9 (57.7-72.7) years, and 948 were male (65.5%). A total of 723 patients were assigned to prourokinase and 723 to standard care. The primary outcome occurred in 639 patients (88.5%) in the prourokinase group and 658 (91.0%) in the standard care group (relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01; 2-sided P = .12). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 0.7% (5 of 723 patients) with prourokinase and 0% with standard care, and mortality at 90 days was 2.3% and 1.4%, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance  Results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrate that prourokinase was not superior to standard care to improve the functional outcomes for patients with mild ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours after symptom onset but had a similar safety profile.

Trial Registration  ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05507645

Monday, January 20, 2025

Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke: a study on intravenous thrombolysis in patients over 80 years of age with acute ischaemic stroke.

You wouldn't have to worry about hemorrhages if you vastly reduced the bolus by delivering it via magnetic nanoparticles. Or are you FUCKING INCOMPETENT in not knowing about that?

We should have been using magnetic nanoparticles to deliver tPA for years. Then you wouldn't have to waste money on research like this.

Maybe this solution from March, 2015

Magnetic nanoparticles could stop blood clot-caused strokes

Or this from May, 2012

Future of med devices: Nanorobots in your blood stream 

Send me hate mail on this: oc1dean@gmail.com. I'll print your complete statement with your name and my response in my blog. Or are you afraid to engage with my stroke-addled mind? No excuses are allowed! You're medically trained; it should be simple to precisely refute all my points with NO EXCUSES!! And what is your definition of competence in stroke? Swearing at me is allowed, I'll return the favor. Don't even attempt to use that brain research is hard

Thelatest here:

Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke: a study on intravenous thrombolysis in patients over 80 years of age with acute ischaemic stroke.

Marius Matusevicius, Ana Paiva Nunes, Manju Krishnan, Jose Egido

BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 11; 15(1): e087454

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety and efficacy outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients aged >80 years with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) after IVT was approved in this patient population in several European and non-European countries during 2018-2019.

DESIGN

This is an observational registry study using prospectively collected data from the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke (SITS) registry. Comparisons will be performed between patients treated post-approval (July 2018 to December 2021) period with those treated pre-approval (June 2015 to June 2018) period using propensity score matching (PSM).

SETTING

This is a multicentre international study in hospitals treating AIS with IVT.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged >80 years who otherwise followed the IVT Summary of Product Characteristics of European countries as part of the mutual recognition procedure.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

The main outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage per SITS monitoring study definition, death and functional independency as defined by a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days.

RESULTS

After PSM, 614 patients remained in each group (mean age 87 years, 39% males). All baseline data were well balanced after PSM. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between pre- and post-approval patients for SICH (2.5% vs 2.3%, risk ratio (RR) 1.064, 95% CI 0.345-1.784), death (25.3% vs 28.4%, RR 0.889, 0.699-1.08) and functional independency at 90 days (40.3% vs 37%, RR 1.089, 0.942-1.237).

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study of IVT treatment in patients >80 years of age with AIS before and after formal approval for this treatment, we did not find any difference in outcomes between the pre- and post-approval periods.
Source: BMJ open

Wednesday, October 30, 2024

World Stroke Day Research Spotlight: A significant leap forward in targeted drug delivery for stroke patients

This just proves the COMPLETE FUCKING INCOMPENCE OF STROKE LEADERSHIP! It took over 9 years to get from first research concept to actual product.

You mean stroke leadership completely fucking failed at putting together magnetic nanoparticles delivering smaller loads of tPA resulting in much less chance of bleeds? Solving doctor reluctance.

We should have been using magnetic nanoparticles to deliver tPA for years.

Maybe this solution from March, 2015

Magnetic nanoparticles could stop blood clot-caused strokes

Or this from May, 2012

Future of med devices: Nanorobots in your blood stream

The latest here:

World Stroke Day Research Spotlight: A significant leap forward in targeted drug delivery for stroke patients

On World Stroke Day, we are bringing attention to two groundbreaking European stroke research projects. One of these, the ANGIE project, funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programme, focuses on an innovative approach to treating ischemic strokes—strokes caused by blood clots that block blood flow to the brain. 

Current treatments, like the drug rtPA, dissolve clots but must be administered in large doses, increasing the risk of dangerous side effects. To address this, researchers, led by Principal Investigator Professor Salvador Panè, developed tiny dissolvable microrobots that can be guided through blood vessels using magnetic fields. These microrobots deliver the drug directly to the clot, making treatment more precise and reducing risks. 

“This is a significant leap forward in targeted drug delivery,” said Professor Panè, while Arlene Wilkie, Director General of the Stroke Alliance for Europe, added, “We look forward to seeing this technology transform stroke care and improve patient outcomes.” 

This breakthrough offers hope for more effective and safer stroke treatments, potentially improving recovery rates and reducing long-term complications.

Learn more in this video

 

The project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 952152. 

More information can be found at www.h2020-angie.eu  

Monday, December 12, 2022

Utility of tPA Administration in Acute Treatment of Internal Carotid Artery Occlusions

 Interesting because an occlusion of the carotid artery does not directly cause a  stroke if the Circle of Willis is complete. So I don't understand.

Utility of tPA Administration in Acute Treatment of Internal Carotid Artery Occlusions

Abstract

Background

Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) remains part of the guidelines for acute ischemic stroke treatment, yet internal carotid artery occlusions (ICAO) are known to be poorly responsive to IV-tPA. It is unknown whether bridging thrombolysis (BT) is beneficial in such cases.

Purpose

We sought to evaluate whether the use of IV-tPA improved overall clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for ICA occlusions.

Methods

Data from 1367 consecutive stroke cases treated with EVT from 2012-2019 were prospectively collected from a single center. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the relationship between IV-tPA administration and clinical outcome.

Results

153 patients were found to have carotid terminus and tandem ICAO who received EVT and presented within 4.5h of last seen well. 50% (n = 82) received IV tPA. There were no differences between the groups with respect to age, NIHSS, time to EVT and ASPECTS score. 53% had tandem ICA-MCA occlusions. Rate of recanalization (≥ TICI 2B) and sICH did not significantly differ between the two groups. Regression analysis demonstrated no effect of IV-tPA on modified Rankin Score (mRS) at 90 days and overall mortality. Factors significantly associated with reduced mortality included lower age, lower NIHSS, and better rate of recanalization.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes in those receiving BT vs. direct EVT for ICAO. For centers with optimal door-to-puncture times, bypassing IV-tPA may expedite recanalization times and potentially yield more favorable outcomes. Patients with higher NIHSS and tandem lesions may have better outcomes with BT.

Get full access to this article

Thursday, June 30, 2022

Intravenous tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) Correlates With Favorable Venous Outflow Profiles in Acute Ischemic Stroke

If you're not measuring recovery you're doing fucking useless research. Venous outflow is some intermediate step.

“What's measured, improves.” So said management legend and author Peter F. Drucker 

Intravenous tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) Correlates With Favorable Venous Outflow Profiles in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038560Stroke. 2022;0:10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038560

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) is often administered before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Recent studies have questioned whether tPA is necessary given the high rates of arterial recanalization achieved by EVT, but whether tPA impacts venous outflow (VO) is unknown. We investigated whether tPA improves VO profiles on baseline computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) images before EVT.

METHODS:

Retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion undergoing EVT triage. Included patients underwent CT, CTA, and CT perfusion before EVT. VO profiles were determined by opacification of the vein of Labbé, sphenoparietal sinus, and superficial middle cerebral vein on CTA as 0, not visible; 1, moderate opacification; and 2, full. Pial arterial collaterals were graded on CTA, and tissue-level collaterals were assessed on CT perfusion using the hypoperfusion intensity ratio. Clinical and demographic data were determined from the electronic medical record. Using multivariable regression analysis, we determined the correlation between tPA administration and favorable VO profiles.

RESULTS:

Seven hundred seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. Three hundred sixty-five patients received tPA (tPA+), while 352 patients were not treated with tPA (tPA−). Fewer tPA+ patients had atrial fibrillation (n=128 [35%] versus n=156 [44%]; P=0.012) and anticoagulants/antiplatelet treatment before acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion onset (n=130 [36%] versus n=178 [52%]; P<0.001) compared with tPA− patients. One hundred eighty-five patients (51%) in the tPA+ and 100 patients (28%) in the tPA− group exhibited favorable VO (P<0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that tPA administration was a strong independent predictor of favorable VO profiles (OR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.7–4.0]; P<0.001) after control for favorable pial arterial CTA collaterals, favorable tissue-level collaterals on CT perfusion, age, presentation National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment, history of atrial fibrillation and time from symptom onset to imaging.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion undergoing thrombectomy triage, tPA administration was strongly associated with the presence of favorable VO profiles.

Tuesday, May 10, 2022

DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study

Nothing here even remotely tells you you have zero chance of getting 100% recovered at 4.5 hours. The tyranny of low expectations in full view, you'll have to scream at your doctor for such low goal setting in stroke.

DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study

Published:October 05, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70192-2

Summary

Background

Many patients with stroke are precluded from thrombolysis treatment because the time from onset of their symptoms is unknown. We aimed to test whether a mismatch in visibility of an acute ischaemic lesion between diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI (DWI-FLAIR mismatch) can be used to detect patients within the recommended time window for thrombolysis.

Methods

In this multicentre observational study, we analysed clinical and MRI data from patients presenting between Jan 1, 2001, and May 31, 2009, with acute stroke for whom DWI and FLAIR were done within 12 h of observed symptom onset. Two neurologists masked to clinical data judged the visibility of acute ischaemic lesions on DWI and FLAIR imaging, and DWI-FLAIR mismatch was diagnosed by consensus. We calculated predictive values of DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with symptom onset within 4·5 h and within 6 h and did multivariate regression analysis to identify potential confounding covariates. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01021319.

Findings

The final analysis included 543 patients. Mean age was 66·0 years (95% CI 64·7–67·3) and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 8 (IQR 4–15). Acute ischaemic lesions were identified on DWI in 516 patients (95%) and on FLAIR in 271 patients (50%). Interobserver agreement for acute ischaemic lesion visibility on FLAIR imaging was moderate (κ=0·569, 95% CI 0·504–0·634). DWI-FLAIR mismatch identified patients within 4·5 h of symptom onset with 62% (95% CI 57–67) sensitivity, 78% (72–84) specificity, 83% (79–88) positive predictive value, and 54% (48–60) negative predictive value. Multivariate regression analysis identified a longer time to MRI (p<0·0001), a lower age (p=0·0009), and a larger DWI lesion volume (p=0·0226) as independent predictors of lesion visibility on FLAIR imaging.

Interpretation

Patients with an acute ischaemic lesion detected with DWI but not with FLAIR imaging are likely to be within a time window for which thrombolysis is safe and effective. (Your definition of effective is vastly different that your patients. 100% recovery is the stroke survivor goal. GET THERE!) These findings lend support to the use of DWI-FLAIR mismatch for selection of patients in a future randomised trial of thrombolysis in patients with unknown time of symptom onset.

Funding

Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, National Institutes of Health.
 

Saturday, May 7, 2022

Ace the Case: A 38-Year-Old Man With Ischemic Stroke -CME

 This is so fucking godawful, The CME(Continuing Medical Education) stops right after the diagnosis of a PFO. So our stroke medical 'professionals don't give a flying fuck about actually getting survivors 100% recovered. Their tyranny of low expectations is so low it is found somewhere in hell. This is why survivors need to be in charge, existing stroke 'leadership' is a complete failure. And they don't even provide the correct answer to tPA administration. 4.5 hours. And that is even wrong since that administration time won't get you 100% recovered. 

In this research in mice the needed time frame for tPA delivery is 3 minutes.

Electrical 'storms' and 'flash floods' drown the brain after a stroke

The latest here:

Ace the Case: A 38-Year-Old Man With Ischemic Stroke - CME

Monday, February 28, 2022

Newer generation, clot-busting stroke medication cuts the risk of serious bleeding in half

 NOT GOD ENOUGH!  You could probably cut that risk to zero if you were to do the following.

The real solution to this is reducing the size of the bolus substantially.

You mean stroke leadership completely fucking failed at putting together magnetic nanoparticles delivering smaller loads of tPA resulting in much less chance of bleeds? Solving doctor reluctance.

We should have been using magnetic nanoparticles to deliver tPA for years.

Maybe this solution from March, 2015

Magnetic nanoparticles could stop blood clot-caused strokes

Or this from  May, 2012

Future of med devices: Nanorobots in your blood stream

The latest here:

Newer generation, clot-busting stroke medication cuts the risk of serious bleeding in half

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

In an international registry, patients with clot-caused strokes (ischemic) treated with the newer generation single injection clot-busting medication tenecteplase had  half as many serious complications involving bleeding into the brain compared to people who received the standard medication alteplase, according to preliminary research to be presented at the American Stroke Association's International Stroke Conference 2022.

Alteplase, the current standard of care for , is administered by injection followed by an hour-long infusion and has been FDA-approved for treating clot-caused strokes since 1996. Tenecteplase is a newer generation medication administered by a single injection into a blocked blood vessel. Both medications are approved for use in dissolving clots in blocked heart arteries, and tenecteplase is sometimes used off-label to treat ischemic strokes. The latest ischemic stroke treatment guidelines from the American Heart Association recommend it might be reasonable to consider tenecteplase for ischemic stroke in select . Several recent clinical trials focused on ischemic stroke have directly compared alteplase and tenecteplase, however, large, Phase 3 trials are still ongoing.

"No single trial has proved that tenecteplase is superior, however, in combination, the evidence has shown that tenecteplase is at least as good as alteplase in preventing long-term disability after a stroke and is more effective in dissolving large clots," said Steven J. Warach, M.D., Ph.D., lead author of the study and professor of neurology at the Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, medical director for Ascension hospitals in Texas and chair of Ascension's national stroke group.

The current study examined tenecteplase use at hospitals in New Zealand, Australia and the United States. The data registry among the hospitals launched in 2021 and included data for the previous three years: from July 2018 through June 2021. Stroke centers within the participating hospital systems began using tenecteplase after July 2018, and some administer only alteplase. All patients treated with thrombolytics (medications to dissolve blood clots) were included, enabling researchers to have a tenecteplase-treated group and an alteplase-treated group for comparison.

"The effects of a medicine used in real world is not always the same as those observed in the controlled environment of clinical trials. The goal of our analysis was to evaluate whether tenecteplase is as safe as alteplase when used to treat in routine clinical practice," Warach said.

The researchers analyzed data on 6,429 patients (average age of 70 years; 48.7% female) who received alteplase and 1,462 (average age of 73 years; 44.1% female) who received tenecteplase. On average, patients in both groups had experienced moderate .

The patients who received tenecteplase had slightly worse scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) compared to the patients who received alteplase. (NIHSS is the international standard used to measure stroke severity.) Patients who received tenecteplase were also more likely to undergo a minimally invasive procedure to mechanically remove a large clot in the brain (thrombectomy). Thrombectomy is needed for many stroke patients who have larger artery blockages and more severe strokes. Researchers noted the difference in outcomes between the two patient groups was anticipated because some stroke centers only gave tenecteplase to patients with large clots after 2018, when clinical trials confirmed that tenecteplase was better than alteplase in those patients.

To evaluate the safety of tenecteplase, researchers compared the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after treatment with alteplase vs. tenecteplase. (sICH is bleeding within the brain that worsened the patient's NIHSS score by at least 4 points.)

"Thrombolysis treatment involves the administration of powerful blood-thinning medication, and bleeding into the brain is the most serious side effect. Intracranial hemorrhage information was available for all our study patients since it is routinely recorded by all stroke centers," Warach said.

The results were adjusted for age, severity of stroke and the need for thrombectomy. The analysis found:

  • The sICH rate was 43% lower among patients who received tenecteplase (3.71% in the alteplase group, and 2.13% in the tenecteplase group);
  • Among patients who did not undergo thrombectomy, the sICH rate was 42% lower among those who received tenecteplase (3% for the alteplase group, and 1.74% for the tenecteplase group); and
  • Among patients who required thrombectomy, the sICH rate was 59% lower for patients who received tenecteplase (6.8% for the alteplase group, and 2.8% for the tenecteplase group).

"The significantly lower rates of sICH surprised us. Our finding that tenecteplase had about half the risk of sICH when compared with alteplase in routine clinical practice provides reassurance that tenecteplase does not result in harmful bleeding when used routinely for stroke treatment," Warach said.

"Our data show no safety concerns when tenecteplase is used in routine practice, however, safety outcome is only one aspect to consider. Functional outcomes of patients—incidence of disability from stroke and recovery time—are also important. The registry does include data on patients' recovery and disability outcomes; however, we have not yet performed an analysis of those outcomes. A number of clinical trials in progress comparing tenecteplase to alteplase are assessing whether tenecteplase improves the chances of functional recovery. Clinicians may elect to wait until results of these trials are published, however, our results provide reassurance that routine tenecteplase use is safe," Warach said.

Results from this retrospective, observational study cannot prove a cause-and-effect relationship between the type of clot-buster used and the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. In addition, the clinicians assessing the patients are aware of the treatments received, which may introduce bias in the results. Although many more patients received alteplase, the analysis adjusted for this imbalance.

The registry is continuing to add data on more patients from more stroke centers with the goal of addressing additional questions about whether tenecteplase treatment leads to quicker treatment initiation and better recovery from ischemic stroke.



Tuesday, January 25, 2022

Tissue plasminogen activator and patients with acute ischemic stroke: The litigation landscape

 The real solution to this is reducing the size of the bolus subtantially.

You mean stroke leadership completely fucking failed at putting together magnetic nanoparticles delivering smaller loads of tPA resulting in much less chance of bleeds? Solving doctor reluctance.

We should have been using magnetic nanoparticles to deliver tPA for years.

Maybe this solution from March, 2015

Magnetic nanoparticles could stop blood clot-caused strokes

Or this from  May, 2012

Future of med devices: Nanorobots in your blood stream

The latest here:

Tissue plasminogen activator and patients with acute ischemic stroke: The litigation landscape

First published: 22 January 2022

Prior presentation: American College of Emergency Physicians Research Forum, October 2021, Boston, MA.

Funding and support: : By JACEP Open policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.

Supervising Editor: Marna Rayl Greenberg, DO, MPH.

Abstract

Objective

Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is considered standard of care for acute ischemic stroke treatment, but some physicians withhold or delay this highly time-dependent therapy from stroke patients because they do not think it works well or they are worried about the adverse effects or fear medico-legal consequences. The authors sought to investigate whether litigation arises from physicians treating versus not treating acute ischemic stroke patients with tPA.

Methods

The authors examined closed cases from 1996 to 2020 in an online legal database, Westlaw, regarding alleged complaints for whether or not thrombolytic treatment was given for acute stroke.

Results

Sixty-six relevant cases were identified. In all 66 cases, the plaintiffs sued for issues stemming from either failure to give tPA or a delay in giving tPA. In 77% of cases the verdict was in favor of the defendant. Only 1 lawsuit included intracerebral hemorrhage after tPA, but it was brought forth owing to delay in giving tPA; the verdict was in favor of the defendant.

Conclusion

It is more common for patients to sue physicians for not administering tPA in a timely fashion or at any point. Medicolegal risks of withholding or delaying tPA are clear, whereas we found no clear medicolegal risk to providing tPA when indicated.

 

Saturday, January 15, 2022

Stroke services in Africa: What is there and what is needed

Two major problems. 

1. The chances of ever getting tPA delivered in anything under 4.5 hours is nigh impossible for most of the continent.

2. Mechanical thrombectomy in a reasonable time is also highly unlikely.

To address this lack of immediate interventions the services in Africa will have to rely on 100% recovery protocols. Since they don't exist yet and no one is working on them, I see little hope for stroke patients in Africa. At least until we get some stroke leadership that prioritizes 100% recovery protocols. 

You don't want to get into dangerous therapies like this:

Train track stroke therapy?

The latest here:

Stroke services in Africa: What is there and what is needed

First Published January 4, 2022 Research Article 

Over the past few years, the incidence and prevalence of stroke has been rising in most African countries and has been reported as one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. To study this problem, we need to realize the quality and availability of stroke care services as a priori to improve them.

In this study, we investigated the availability of different stroke-related services in 17 countries from different African regions. An online survey was conducted and fulfilled by stroke specialists and included primary prevention, acute management, diagnostic tools, medications, postdischarge services, and stroke registries. The results showed that although medications for secondary prevention are available, yet many other services are lacking in various countries.

This study displays the deficient aspects of stroke services in African countries as a preliminary step toward active corrective procedures for the improvement of stroke-related health services.

 

Friday, December 3, 2021

Achieving More Rapid Door-to-Needle Times and Improved Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Nationwide Quality Improvement Intervention

 But you don't know how fast you have to be to get tPA full recovery.  I'm sure it is well prior to the hospital.

In this research in mice the needed time frame for tPA delivery is 3 minutes.

Electrical 'storms' and 'flash floods' drown the brain after a stroke

 

'Think your stroke team can do that?' Since you will never meet that goal you are going to have to go down the difficult route of solving the 5 causes of the neuronal cascade of death in the first week. 100% recovery is still expected.

 

The latest here:

Achieving More Rapid Door-to-Needle Times and Improved Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Nationwide Quality Improvement Intervention

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035853Stroke. 2021;0:STROKEAHA.121.035853

Background and Purpose:

The benefits of tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) in acute ischemic stroke are time-dependent. However, delivery of thrombolytic therapy rapidly after hospital arrival was initially occurring infrequently in hospitals in the United States, discrepant with national guidelines.

Methods:

We evaluated door-to-needle (DTN) times and clinical outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving tPA before and after initiation of 2 successive nationwide quality improvement initiatives: Target: Stroke Phase I (2010–2013) and Target: Stroke Phase II (2014–2018) from 913 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals in the United States between April 2003 and September 2018.

Results:

Among 154 221 patients receiving tPA within 3 hours of stroke symptom onset (median age 72 years, 50.1% female), median DTN times decreased from 78 minutes (interquartile range, 60–98) preintervention, to 66 minutes (51–87) during Phase I, and 50 minutes (37–66) during Phase II (P<0.001). Proportions of patients with DTN ≤60 minutes increased from 26.4% to 42.7% to 68.6% (P<0.001). Proportions of patients with DTN ≤45 minutes increased from 10.1% to 17.7% to 41.4% (P<0.001). By the end of the second intervention, 75.4% and 51.7% patients achieved 60-minute and 45-minute DTN goals. Compared with the preintervention period, hospitals during the second intervention period (2014–2018) achieved higher rates of tPA use (11.7% versus 5.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.43 [95% CI, 2.31–2.56]), lower in-hospital mortality (6.0% versus 10.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.69 [0.64–0.73]), fewer bleeding complication (3.4% versus 5.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.68 [0.62–0.74]), and higher rates of discharge to home (49.6% versus 35.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.43 [1.38–1.50]). Similar findings were found in sensitivity analyses of 185 501 patients receiving tPA within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.

Conclusions:

A nationwide quality improvement program for acute ischemic stroke was associated with substantial improvement in the timeliness of thrombolytic therapy start, increased thrombolytic treatment, and improved clinical outcomes.

 

Tuesday, November 23, 2021

Zivin Lecture: Debate Rages on tPA vs. tNK for Acute Stroke

It's an incredibly simple question. Does TNK have a better 100% recovery rate than the abysmal 12% of tPA. I like the idea of giving it in the ambulance, door to puncture time is way too slow for tPA. And yet the discussion is around the wrong goal of recanalization instead of recovery. This is why survivors need to be in charge, they wouldn't accept the tyranny of low expectations shown here. 

What is the experience needed for TNK?

To Master Stroke Thrombectomy, It Takes Way More Than 50 Cases

The latest here:

Zivin Lecture: Debate Rages on tPA vs. tNK for Acute Stroke

Is it time to switch from alteplase (tPA) to tenecteplase (tNK) to treat acute stroke? There are data on both sides, but no large head-to-head trials have reported to date.

Cardiologists have been using tNK to lyse clots in acute myocardial infarction for two decades. That is nearly as long as stroke specialists have been using tPA to lyse clots in acute stroke.

tNK is cheaper than tPA in many locales. tNK requires a bolus injection over five to 10 seconds rather than the infusion required to administer tPA. And clinical trials show similar results in thrombolysis. Should stroke neurologists switch to tNK?

Yes, said Mark Parsons, professor and director of neurology, and The Royal Melbourne Hospital Chair of Neurology at the University of Melbourne in Australia. He pointed out that two Australian states have already replaced tPA with tNK for pre-thrombectomy care of acute stroke patients.

“tPA really doesn’t work very well in vascular occlusion,” Parsons said. “You are more likely to get early response with tNK, hence improved canalization. We know that early recanalization translates to better clinical outcomes. And tNK is infinitely more practical to give in the stroke ambulance.”

Not so fast, countered James Grotta, MD, director of Mobile Stroke Unit Consortium at the Clinical Innovation and Research Institute at Memorial Mermann Hospital-TMC in Houston.

“Just because something is newer and faster doesn’t mean it is better. tNK may be equivalent to tPA, but it’s not better, and we need to do better,” he said. “The best way to improve on tPA is not to try a different thrombolytic but to get whatever thrombolytic we are using into more patients, faster.”(But you don't know how fast tPA has to be delivered to get 100% recovery, do you? Without that piece of data you're just flailing in the dark?)

Parsons and Grotta led opposing sides on tPA vs. tNK for acute stroke during The Justin Zivin Memorial Session: “The Tried and Tested vs. The New Kid on the Block: The tPA vs. tNK Debate.”

New study data may help settle the question. Parsons noted the Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for Stroke Thrombolysis Evaluation (TASTE) trial for treatment within 45 hours of the onset of symptoms is nearly completed. TASTE-A, comparing treatment when used on the stroke ambulance, is about to begin.

Parsons was joined by Shelagh Coutts, MD, MSc, stroke neurologist, clinical investigator in stroke and associate professor of neurology at the University of Calgary in Canada, on the switch-to-tNK side.

“TNK is at least as good as tPA; it is easier to use; and it works well for drip-and-ship models,” Coutts said. “It is a question of when, not if, we switch to tNK.”

The data are clear, she said. In MI use, tNK is equivalent to tPA in terms of mortality, more potent in a patient with longer duration of MI and has a reduced rate of major bleeds.

tNK has been trialed in more than 27,000 patients worldwide, she continued. Stroke trials of tNK are smaller, but the data are similarly positive with better outcomes from tNK vs. tPA and better recanalization rates at one and 24 hours with no increased rate in intracerebral hemorrhage.

A formal meta-analysis of tNK stroke trials to date was presented at the International Stroke Conference. The data show similar disability-free rates for the two agents and demonstrate non-inferiority for tNK. The pooled data also suggest that the 0.25 mg/kg dose of tNK is more effective with fewer adverse events compared to other doses.

Grotta was joined by Christopher Lewandowski, MD, vice chair of emergency medicine at Henry Ford Hospital and clinical professor of emergency medicine at Wayne State University, on the stick-with-tPA side.

“As an ER doc, I can tell you that stroke is not the same as acute MI,” Lewandowski said. “The hemorrhage rate in stroke can be three, five, 10 times higher than in MI. TNK in acute MI is not better, it is equivalent. It is a little cheaper, and the bolus makes it nicer for nurses to use. But ER docs won’t start using tNK until a solid study supports superiority and ease of use over tPA. We just don’t have the experience with tNK that we have with tPA.”

 

 

Thursday, November 18, 2021

Close the time gap between stroke assessment and treatment

 How many minutes post stroke does tPA need to be delivered to get fully recovered? Don't know that, you don't have a clue on what needs to be done to get there, you're just guessing and hoping for the best. NOT GOOD ENOUGH!

Close the time gap between stroke assessment and treatment

This app helps EMS providers triage symptoms more accurately and quickly – and get the patient to the right facility without delay

Yesterday at 2:55 PM


Sponsored by ALLM

By Laura Neitzel, EMS1 BrandFocus Staff

When a person experiences a stroke or cardiac event, time is of the essence. According to the American Stroke Association, every 30 minutes of delay leads to a 10% decrease in the chance of a good outcome.(Wrong goal, the only goal in stroke is 100% recovery. You still don't know how many minutes post stroke you have to deliver tPA to get 100% recovery. My bet it is while still in the ambulance, and I don't consider mobile stroke units fast enough, they are using old technology(CT scans))


Quick and accurate triaging of stroke symptoms and transport to the right kind of facility are critical to patient outcomes.
Quick and accurate triaging of stroke symptoms and transport to the right kind of facility are critical to patient outcomes. (Getty Images)

Reducing the time from onset to treatment can make the difference between improving survival and prognosis or risking patient death or disability. Patient care begins the moment the EMS provider arrives and starts watching the systems, identifying the condition, triaging, communicating with the hospital team and making decisions that can better prepare them to receive and stabilize the patient.

But two key challenges at the prehospital provider level can lead to delays that impact a patient’s chances of survival and recovery:

1. Assessing the type and severity of stroke in a prehospital environment.

2. Finding an appropriate closest (not just closest) hospital with the medical team, equipment and level of care needed to treat the stroke patient.

THE CHALLENGE IN ASSESSING AND TRIAGING STROKE PATIENTS

Multiple stroke assessment scales have been developed to help both prehospital and in-hospital clinicians determine the likelihood of stroke in a patient exhibiting symptoms of stroke. Because “time is brain,” quick and accurate assessment with severity scoring of a stroke is more likely to lead to a better outcome.

While NIHSS scale is used successfully in the hospital setting to determine the severity of stroke and help guide stroke therapy decisions, it measures 15 clinical functions or deficits, so the time it takes to complete may be impractical for the ambulance.

EMS providers in a prehospital setting need to be familiar with a range of stroke assessment scales. While all will measure voluntary muscle use and recognize generalized signs of stroke, they are not all equal in their ability to identify the type of stroke. According to this report from the National Institutes of Health, there is no single gold standard.

Some assessment protocols have more steps and take more time to complete, while others require the provider to make manual calculations or complete checklists. Scales like the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) or the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) scale are short, simple, easy to remember and avoid the need for calculations – thus making them more feasible in the ambulance.

However, they may miss the specificity needed to identify certain types of stroke, like a symptomatic large anterior vessel occlusion (sLAVO, or simply LVO), which might require the patient to receive endovacscular (EVT) treatment at a comprehensive stroke center.

This can become a critical issue for patient outcomes.

According to a study comparing prehospital scales for predicting sLAVO, the difficulty in reliably identifying sLAVO can cause delays in patient care.

“Because sLAVO cannot be reliably identified in the ambulance, patients suspected of acute stroke are often transferred to the nearest hospital (often a PSC) to start IVT as soon as possible. For patients with sLAVO, this routing leads to a median of 60 to 109 minutes’ delay due to interhospital transfers, with associated worse functional outcomes. Prehospital identification of patients with sLAVO enabling direct allocation to a CSC would greatly reduce delays to EVT treatment and improve clinical outcomes.”[1]

Triaging and identifying the stroke type according to stroke assessment and prediction scales is only the first challenge. The second is getting the patient to a medical facility with the appropriate team and resources in place – in accordance with local protocols that may or may not allow the EMS provider to bypass the nearest hospital in favor of one with the right resources.

ALLM’s JoinTriage app helps to solve both of these challenges.

MAKE ASSESSMENT MORE ACCURATE AND TRIAGING QUICKER

The JoinTriage app from ALLM helps EMS providers quickly and accurately triage patients and ensure they receive the care they need as quickly as possible.

JoinTriage solves and speeds up the triage challenge with the power of artificial intelligence. Within two minutes, the app walks the user through a new set of protocols (developed by ALLM in clinical association with Grady Memorial Hospital and Emory University) that combine features of NIHSS, as well as other major assessment scales used by EMS providers, including FAST, VAN, RACE and CPSS.

The responses are then used to evaluate symptoms and summarize the patient’s condition with a numerical score. The score is accompanied by other useful information, such as the probability of severe outcomes.

Having one decision support engine that encompasses other protocols makes it easier, faster and more feasible for EMS providers to triage and identify various types of stroke in the ambulance, including sLAVO, so providers can make more consistent, data-driven decisions and get the patient to the right kind of facility without delay.

REDUCING DELAYS IN TRANSPORT

When a patient’s condition has been assessed and a score provided, the JoinTriage app will display a map showing the locations of recommended medical centers best suited to treat the patient.

The crown jewel in the JoinTriage app is its database that currently lists all hospitals and medical facilities in the U.S., along with their certifications and capabilities, filling a huge knowledge gap. ALLM is expanding this database to include urgent care centers, primary care offices, nursing homes and other alternative destinations that may be available to EMS providers under the  Emergency Triage, Treat and Transport Model.

The app is also configurable to the requirements of the jurisdiction, so you don’t need to worry about going afoul of local or regional rules, protocols, and restrictions.

COMPLETE THE CONTINUUM OF CARE

In addition to putting a more powerful stroke assessment tool in the hands of EMS providers, JoinTriage also helps them communicate with and coordinate resources at the destination hospital.

By integrating with Join, ALLM’s communication app for hospitals, JoinTriage enables EMS providers to share patient information with the destination hospital via Join chat, giving medical teams at the destination sufficient time to prepare for optimal treatment. They can even do tele-EMS consults while the patient is enroute to the hospital. Further, EMS crew can benefit by receiving the real-time feedback from clinicians directly, thus EMS agencies becoming learning organizations with continual improvement.

A recent study conducted in Vermont, published in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, shows that the stroke assessment scale, FAST-ED, using JoinTriage in the field is statistically comparable to FAST-ED done in the ER. The study also highlights the significance of JoinTriage used by EMS when integrated with the Join app at the hospital level can improve the standard of stroke care, including effective pre-notifications.

“Patient-centered quick and appropriate care is paramount in emergency situations,” said Harry Reddy, chief executive officer of ALLM. “We’re excited to see the innovative and clinically-proven JoinTriage/Join app suite helping transform EMS care for the benefit of patients and providers at point of care and communities at large.”

In the race against time, EMS providers have a new advantage – JoinTriage.

JoinTriage currently has over 35,000 registered users. It is free to EMS providers and available for both iOS and Android devices.

For more information, visit ALLM.

<