Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, May 4, 2024

Digital Apps to Improve Mobility in Adults with Neurological Conditions: A Health App-Focused Systematic Review

You're solving the problem totally wrong! Survivors would gladly do millions of repetitions if that protocol would lead EXACTLY to 100% recovery! You're trying to trick them into doing more repetitions when you have no clue how many are needed to recover.

Digital Apps to Improve Mobility in Adults with Neurological Conditions: A Health App-Focused Systematic Review

by
1 Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
2 School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
3 Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research/South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
4 Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney/Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
5 Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
6 School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
7 Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
8 Royal Rehab, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
9 Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
10 South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(9), 929; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12090929
Submission received: 28 March 2024 / Revised: 22 April 2024 / Accepted: 23 April 2024 / Published: 30 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Telerehabilitation for Optimising Recovery)

Abstract

The provision of mobility exercises through a smartphone application (app) for people undertaking neurological rehabilitation may improve mobility outcomes. However, it is difficult for clinicians and consumers to select high-quality, appropriate apps. This review aimed to identify (1) which mobile health (mHealth) apps are suitable for prescribing mobility exercises for adults with neurological health conditions, (2) how well these apps incorporate telehealth strategies, and (3) how well these apps rate in terms of quality and capacity for behaviour change. The Australian Apple iTunes Store was systematically searched, by using a search code and manually, for apps suitable for training mobility in neurological rehabilitation. Additional searches were conducted in known app repositories and for web-based apps. Trained reviewers extracted data from the included apps, including population-specific characteristics; quality, by using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS); and behaviour change potential, by using the App Behaviour Change Scale (ABACUS). The included apps (n = 18) provided <50 to >10,000 exercises, many incurred a subscription fee (n = 13), and half included telehealth features. App quality was moderate (mean MARS score of 3.2/5 and SD of 0.5), and potential for behaviour change was poor (mean ABACUS score of 5.7/21 and SD of 2.1). A limited number of high-quality apps are available for the prescription of mobility exercises in people with neurological conditions.

Share and Cite

No comments:

Post a Comment