Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, July 6, 2022

“Do you have a plan?” (for stroke)

 Applied from Seth Godin: What is your hospital's plan, your doctor's plan, your therapist's plan, to get you to 100% recovery? No plan?  Then everyone in stroke for you is incompetent.

“Do you have a plan?” (for stroke)

First, let’s agree that there’s a problem.

It may be that I think we’re facing something serious, something costly, something urgent–and you don’t.

We can have an honest conversation about the problem without worrying about whether there’s an easy or certain solution.

We can also have a conversation about whether it’s a problem (problems have solutions) or whether it’s simply a situation, something like gravity that we have to live with.

Once we agree that we have a problem, the status quo will show up. It will argue with every tool it has that any variation from the current path is too risky, too expensive and too painful to consider. The status quo will stall. It will argue for studies and will amplify the pain that will be caused to some as we try to make things better for everyone.

And the status quo usually wins. That’s because the makers of change are now playing defense, forced to justify every choice and ameliorate every inconvenience.

Perhaps there’s a more useful way forward.

We begin by agreeing that there’s a problem.

And then each party, every single one, needs to put forward a plan. A plan that either addresses the problem or takes responsibility for not addressing it.

And for each plan, we can consider the likely outcomes. For each plan, we can ask, “will that work?” and follow it up with, “why?” and “how?”

Perhaps you don’t think it’s a problem worth solving. That’s important to bring up before we ask you if you have a plan.

Delay might be the best option. But then let’s be honest and announce that instead of simply stalling.

No comments:

Post a Comment