Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, April 13, 2026

Budget Impact Analysis of Kickstart Exoskeletal Technology for Stroke Rehabilitation within the Ontario Hospital System

Stroke survivors don't care about 'cost'. They want to know 100% RECOVERY EFFECTIVENESS! Are you that blitheringly stupid? What are the EXACT RECOVERY RESULTS? This just seems to be get them somewhat mobile so we can kick them out the door!

Of course, this technology has been out there a while and the incompetence shown in how long to bring it in is FUCKINGLY IMPRESSIVE!

 Budget Impact Analysis of Kickstart Exoskeletal Technology for Stroke Rehabilitation within the Ontario Hospital System

Danielle M. Dobney, PhD, MSc, CAT, Gaven Ren, BKin, Samena Rashid-Mohamed , BSc, MHSc, CHE, Danvir Sandhu , BSc (Candidate), Eimerie Mengulloe , Diploma in Digital Communications and Media Affiliations University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada University of Western Ontario, London, Canada University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada Trent University, Peterborough, Canada Study Context Ontario Hospital System, Canada Corresponding Author Danielle Dobney Email: ddobney@kickstartcanada.com Running Title Budget Impact of Kickstart in Stroke Rehabilitation Keywords stroke rehabilitation, budget impact analysis, health economics, exoskeleton, Ontario Word count 4765 (excluding title page and references) 

 Abstract: 


 Background: Stroke places a significant and growing economic burden on the Ontario health care system, particularly within inpatient rehabilitation. Technologies that accelerate functional recovery may improve both patient outcomes and system efficiency. 

Objective: 

 To estimate the budget impact of implementing Kickstart technology in Ontario hospitals. 

Methods: 

 A budget impact model was developed using Ontario-specific attributable stroke costs, adjusted to 2026 values using healthcare inflation. Hospital scenarios were modeled for community hospitals and regional stroke centres using published admission volumes. Savings were estimated based on reductions in inpatient rehabilitation length of stay (1-5 days) and a per-diem cost range of $800 - $1,200 CAD. A 35% eligibility rate was applied to reflect patients meeting clinical criteria for device use. 

Results: 

 The projected 2026 attributable cost of stroke was $39,455 CAD per patient, including $8,492 for inpatient rehabilitation. In community hospitals, annual savings ranged from $44,000 to $330,000, with a moderate estimate of $165,000. In regional centres, savings ranged from $112,000 to $840,000, with a moderate estimate of $420,000. Device costs were offset after approximately 5–9 patients. 

Conclusion: 

 Kickstart implementation may yield substantial cost savings by reducing rehabilitation length of stay while improving system capacity and efficiency. These findings support further real-world evaluation to validate projected benefits.

No comments:

Post a Comment