Reliability and validity of virtual reality box & block test in healthy adults and patients with stroke: a prospective, multi-center, exploratory, cross-sectional study

 'Assessments' ARE ABSOLUTELY FUCKING USELESS UNLES THEY POINT DIRECTLY TO EXACT REHAB PROTOCOLS!

I never had this test, it would have been completely useless, I've never been able to get my fingers open due to spasticity. But that's ok because of the idiotic do nothingism of Dr. William M. Landau on spasticity!  

His statement from here:

Spasticity After Stroke: Why Bother? Aug. 2004

Wonder if he will be singing the same tune after he becomes the 1 in 4 per WHO that has a stroke, will he be satisfied with not getting recovered?

The latest here:

Reliability and validity of virtual reality box & block test in healthy adults and patients with stroke: a prospective, multi-center, exploratory, cross-sectional study

• Seo Jung Yun, 
• Jung Hyun Kim, 
• Ji Hyun Lee, 
• Dae Eun Kim, 
• Byung-Mo Oh, 
• Woo Hyung Lee, 
• Bum Sun Kwon & 
• Han Gil Seo 

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation volume 22, Article number: 241 (2025) Cite this article

• 119 Accesses

• Metricsdetails

Abstract

Background

Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising tool, offering immersive environments, real-time feedback, and kinematic data to support both evaluation and training in rehabilitation. The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a simple yet well-validated clinical tool commonly used to assess upper extremity function. This study aimed to develop and validate two versions of the virtual reality Box & Block Test (VR-BBT) in healthy adults and patients with stroke.

Methods

Participants completed the conventional BBT as well as two versions of a VR-BBT developed for this study: a physical interaction version (VR-PI) and a non-physical interaction version (VR-N). Primary outcome measures included the number of blocks transferred in the BBT, VR-PI, and VR-N. In patients with stroke, additional kinematic parameters (e.g., movement speed and distance) from the VR-BBT were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-four healthy adults and 24 patients with stroke were enrolled. Patients with stroke scored 55.65 ± 12.04 and 27.04 ± 16.88 in BBT, 28.40 ± 12.44 and 14.19 ± 10.24 in VR-PI, and 30.69 ± 11.29 and 16.21 ± 11.92 in VR-N for the unaffected and affected hands, respectively. The VR-BBT showed strong correlations with the BBT (r = 0.841 for VR-PI, r = 0.827 for VR-N). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) indicated excellent reliability (BBT = 0.982, VR-PI = 0.940, VR-N = 0.943). Correlations with FMA-UE were 0.839, 0.657, and 0.676 for BBT, VR-PI, and VR-N, respectively. The affected hand exhibited statistically significantly lower movement speed than the unaffected hand. Movement distance was greater in the affected hand than in the unaffected hand for VR-N (p = 0.046), with a similar but non-significant trend for VR-PI (p = 0.062).

Conclusions

The VR-BBT demonstrated strong reliability and validity despite differences in performance counts compared to BBT. The affected hand showed greater movement distance but lower speed, indicating inefficient motor control. These parameters were significantly associated with FMA-UE, suggesting their potential as objective markers of upper limb motor impairment. These findings suggest that the VR-BBT could serve as a complementary tool for motor function assessment, with potential applications in tele-rehabilitation and virtual reality-based rehabilitation.

Trial registration KCT0009584 (Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea).