Physician discusses rapid improvement ten years after stroke at the INR(Institute of Neurological Recovery

 You'll want to google this first:

(institute of neurological recovery quack)

If this truly worked you would see research results rather than anecdotes. But up to you to decide which side is correct. The client in the video would be able to prove she had a stroke and be available for followup questions with no INR employes around.  That is the minimum needed to prove this works.

institute of neurological recovery video

This whole response to the Better Business Bureau of Boca Raton, FL is instructive:

No service was provided to improve my wife's disabilities from a
stroke as state by the doctor. Procedure date September 15,
2016 - no changes good, bad just nothing at all. He is a total
scam artist with films of Australian actors playing the parts of
stroke victims demonstrating amazing recovery results. I found
out after the procedure that many people were scammed in LA
which he ran out of town to Boca Raton now. He scammed me
for $7600.00 without any remorse...$7100 from ******** *******
however ***** ***** BackCharged $500 - a good company, *****
***** not ******** *******...

Desired Outcome

Total refund for no service provided

Institute of Neurological Recovery Response

02/10/2017

Case# ********* ******* ****** The allegation that the patient did not respond to treatment is not correct. The allegation that there were no changes for the good is not correct. The allegation that this is a scam is not correct. The allegation that the scam includes films of Australian actors playing the part of stroke victims is not correct. The allegation "ran out of town" is not correct. There has been no bank reversal of these charges. There is no merit to any of these complaints. February 8, 2017 *** ******* General Manager Institute of Neurological Recovery

Customer Response

02/14/2017

(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) *** ******* is dishonest as is the doctor. Thieves respond as such. The consent form was a cut and paste job. Never did I see the total charge of $7600.00 until Mr. ******* sent that created consent form last week.

Institute of Neurological Recovery Response

02/22/2017

BBB Complaint Case# XXXXXXXX The allegations that "*** ******* is dishonest as is the doctor" are completely unsupported, and not correct. The implication that Mr. ******* and the Doctor are thieves is unsupported, and absolutely untrue. The allegation that "The consent form was a cut and paste job" is completely unsupported, and not correct. Both the bank and the credit card company accepted this same form. The allegation that the consent form was created last week is completely unsupported, and not correct. The allegation that the consumer never saw the total charge of $7600.00 until "Mr. ******* sent that created consent form last week" is completely unsupported, and not correct. The consumer was fully informed of the treatment fee prior to treatment. The consumer reviewed and signed the consent form, which informed the consumer of the cost of treatment, prior to treatment. The consumer's signature is on the credit card slip, signed prior to treatment, and was honored by the bank and credit card companies. Similar allegations made by the consumer to the credit card company and the banks were found to be non-meritorious. The consumer has supplied no evidence of wrongdoing. All rulings have been completely in our favor, as the ruling from the BBB must be, based on the indisputable evidence. There is no merit to any of his complaints. February 22, 2017 *** ******* General Manager Institute of Neurological Recovery