Has your competent? hospital addressed these in-hospital stroke failures? Nine+ years and are they still incompetent?
Stroke outcomes can be worse when they occur in hospital, Canadian study finds December 2016
Diane and Bob weren't so lucky within the hospital.
The latest here:
In-Hospital Stroke Quality and Outcomes in the Mechanical Thrombectomy Era: Get With The Guidelines-Stroke, 2016 to 2023
Stroke
Abstract
In-hospital stroke is associated with delayed recognition and worse outcomes compared with community-onset stroke. Contemporary national data in the mechanical thrombectomy (MT) era are limited.METHODS:
We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult ischemic stroke admissions in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry from January 2016 to December 2023 (the MT era). In-hospital stroke was compared with community-onset stroke as the primary analysis. A secondary descriptive analysis comparing in-hospital patients with stroke from January 2006 to April 2012 and January 2016 to December 2023 was also performed. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, discharge home, and independent ambulation at discharge. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations accounted for within-hospital clustering and adjusted for demographics, vascular risk factors/comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Temporal trends in MT use were assessed with the Cochran-Armitage trend test.RESULTS:
Among 4 996 392 ischemic stroke admissions from 2016 to 2023, 191 355 (3.8%) were in-hospital, and 4 805 037 (96.2%) were community onset. In-hospital patients presented with greater severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >20: 14.5% versus 7.9%; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 0–4: 43.3% versus 60.4%) had worse outcomes including higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27 [95% CI, 2.18–2.36]; P<0.001), lower likelihood of discharge home (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.45–0.48]; P<0.001), and lower independent ambulation at discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.50–0.53]; P<0.001). Recognition-to-computed tomography time was longer for in-hospital (median 51 [interquartile range, 16–269] versus 18 [10–39] minutes; P<0.001). MT rates increased significantly from 2016 to 2023 in both in-hospital and community-onset patients (4.47%–9.54% and 2.35%–5.55%, respectively; P<0.001). Quality metrics and outcomes significantly improved in the MT era, independent of treatment modality.
CONCLUSIONS:
In patients with in-hospital stroke, MT rates increased over time, and improvements in quality metrics were observed regardless of treatment modality. A higher level of stroke severity and worse outcomes persists.
No comments:
Post a Comment