Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

In-Hospital Stroke Quality and Outcomes in the Mechanical Thrombectomy Era: Get With The Guidelines-Stroke, 2016 to 2023

 Has your competent? hospital addressed these in-hospital stroke failures? Nine+ years and are they still incompetent?

 Stroke outcomes can be worse when they occur in hospital, Canadian study finds December 2016 

Diane and Bob weren't so lucky within the hospital. 

The latest here: 

In-Hospital Stroke Quality and Outcomes in the Mechanical Thrombectomy Era: Get With The Guidelines-Stroke, 2016 to 2023


Stroke

Abstract

 In-hospital stroke is associated with delayed recognition and worse outcomes compared with community-onset stroke. Contemporary national data in the mechanical thrombectomy (MT) era are limited. 

METHODS:

 We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult ischemic stroke admissions in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry from January 2016 to December 2023 (the MT era). In-hospital stroke was compared with community-onset stroke as the primary analysis. A secondary descriptive analysis comparing in-hospital patients with stroke from January 2006 to April 2012 and January 2016 to December 2023 was also performed. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, discharge home, and independent ambulation at discharge. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations accounted for within-hospital clustering and adjusted for demographics, vascular risk factors/comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Temporal trends in MT use were assessed with the Cochran-Armitage trend test.

RESULTS:

Among 4 996 392 ischemic stroke admissions from 2016 to 2023, 191 355 (3.8%) were in-hospital, and 4 805 037 (96.2%) were community onset. In-hospital patients presented with greater severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >20: 14.5% versus 7.9%; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 0–4: 43.3% versus 60.4%) had worse outcomes including higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27 [95% CI, 2.18–2.36]; P<0.001), lower likelihood of discharge home (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.45–0.48]; P<0.001), and lower independent ambulation at discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.50–0.53]; P<0.001). Recognition-to-computed tomography time was longer for in-hospital (median 51 [interquartile range, 16–269] versus 18 [10–39] minutes; P<0.001). MT rates increased significantly from 2016 to 2023 in both in-hospital and community-onset patients (4.47%–9.54% and 2.35%–5.55%, respectively; P<0.001). Quality metrics and outcomes significantly improved in the MT era, independent of treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with in-hospital stroke, MT rates increased over time, and improvements in quality metrics were observed regardless of treatment modality. A higher level of stroke severity and worse outcomes persists.

Graphical Abstract



Get full access to this article

No comments:

Post a Comment