Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, January 5, 2022

Frequency, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients With Stroke Beyond 6 Hours of Onset in US Clinical Practice

The obvious takeaway is to come up with interventions that still get you 100% recovered regardless of the time presented to the hospital. But that won't occur, we don't have two functioning neurons in all of stroke leadership. With NO leadership and NO strategy, survivors will continue to be screwed until we get survivors in charge.

Frequency, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients With Stroke Beyond 6 Hours of Onset in US Clinical Practice


Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034069Stroke. 2021;52:3805–3814

Background and Purpose:

In 2018, 2 randomized controlled trials showed the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients treated 6 to 24 hours from last known well using imaging-guided selection. However, little is known about outcomes in contemporary nontrial settings. We assessed the frequency of EVT and outcomes beyond 6 hours in the US Get With The Guidelines–Stroke clinical registry.

Methods:

We analyzed all acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT between January 1, 2009 and October, 1, 2018, at Get With The Guidelines–Stroke hospitals in the United States. We assessed trends over time in frequency of EVT beyond 6 hours, compared patient characteristics and outcomes between those treated within versus beyond 6 hours, and evaluated the associations between EVT time and outcomes.

Results:

We identified 53 702 patients at 697 sites treated with EVT during the study period. Treatment after 6 hours from last known well occurred in 17 720 (33%) of all 53 702 EVT cases (median 4.7 hours, interquartile range, 3.3–7 hours). The proportion of EVT cases treated after 6 hours from last known well varied widely across sites (median 30%, interquartile range, 24%–38%). Compared with patients treated within 6 hours, those treated beyond six hours were younger, less likely to have atrial fibrillation, less likely to arrive by ambulance, had lower stroke severity, were less likely to be anticoagulated, and more likely to be treated at centers with higher EVT volumes. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, patients receiving EVT beyond 6 hours had less favorable in-hospital mortality, ambulation at discharge, and discharge disposition compared to those treated within 6 hours.

Conclusions:

EVT is frequently performed for patients with ischemic stroke after 6 hours from last known well, accounting for one-third of cases nationally, and adjusted functional outcomes at discharge are worse in these patients compared to those treated with EVT within 6 hours. Further efforts are needed for optimal EVT outcomes in clinical practice settings.(Nothing will occur as a result of this research, there are no leaders in stroke,only mice.)

 

No comments:

Post a Comment