Once again the stroke medical world is cherry picking the easier stroke cases to treat. All survivors should be treated and get to 100% recovery. Does NO ONE actually want to solve stroke? Or is that too fucking hard?
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022041?platform=hootsuite
Results of a Mathematical Model
Originally published1 Jan 2018Stroke. 2018;0:STROKEAHA.118.022041
Abstract
Background and Purpose—
Prehospital
routing algorithms for patients with suspected stroke because of large
vessel occlusions should account for likelihood of benefit from
endovascular therapy (EVT), risk of alteplase delays, and transport
times. We built a mathematical model to give a real-time, location-based
optimal emergency medical service routing location based on local
resources, transport times, and patient characteristics.
Methods—
Using
location, onset time, age, sex, and prehospital stroke severity, we
calculated odds of a favorable outcome for a patient with suspected
large vessel occlusions under 2 scenarios: direct to EVT-capable
hospital versus transport to the nearest alteplase-capable hospital with
transfer to EVT-capable hospital if appropriate. We project lifetime
outcomes incorporating disability, quality of life utility, and cost.
Multiple parameter sets of center-specific times (eg, door to alteplase)
were randomly selected within a clinically plausible range to account
for the model sensitivity to these estimates; for each iteration, the
optimal strategy was defined as the most cost-effective outcome
(threshold, $100 000 per quality-adjusted life-years gained). After 1000
simulations, the most frequently occurring optimal strategy was the
final recommendation, with its strength measured as the proportion of
runs for which it was optimal.
Results—
Routing
recommendations were highly sensitive to small changes in model input
parameters. Under many scenarios, the recommendations for direct
transfer to the EVT site increased with increasing stroke severity and
geographic proximity but did not vary substantially with respect to sex,
age, or onset time.
Conclusions—
We
present a mathematical decision model that determines ideal prehospital
routing recommendations for patients with suspected stroke because of
large vessel occlusions, with consideration of patient characteristics
and location at onset. This model may be further refined by
incorporating real-time data on traffic patterns and actual EVT and
alteplase timeliness performance. Further studies are needed to verify
model predictions.
Re whether anyone wants to solve the stroke recovery problems, my vote is "no." I think of it like type 1 diabetes - the dollar amount of disposables, insulin and pumps is sky-high. A person w/o diabetes produces no financial gain. Why cure it and eliminate all that revenue?
ReplyDeleteUltimately, eery business decision comes down to money - in the case of chronically disabled people, 2 years of PT and OT generates a lot of profit for rehab hospitals/clinics. If they recovered 100% in 2-4 months, what a financial loss.