Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, May 11, 2026

Effects of semi-independent bedside rehabilitation of the upper limb assisted with a mobile wrist-hand exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) for inpatients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)

 NO protocol written or locatable; so everything you did is fucking useless! You're fired!

And using Bobath just compounded your incompetence!

Who still uses NDT(Bobath) in stroke rehab when it should have been shitcanned since 2003? Physiotherapy Based on the Bobath Concept for Adults with Post-Stroke Hemiplegia: A Review of Effectiveness Studies 2003)) 

The latest here:

Effects of semi-independent bedside rehabilitation of the upper limb assisted with a mobile wrist-hand exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) for inpatients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)

    We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

    Abstract

    Background

    Robotic-assisted rehabilitation has been used to release the labor burden in manual practice for early stroke rehabilitation. However, its broader application is constrained by high costs, limited accessibility, and high dependence on professional operation. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of semi-independent, bedside upper limb rehabilitation assisted by a wrist-hand exoneuromusculoskeleton (WH-ENMS) for individuals with subacute stroke via a randomized controlled trial compared with the outcomes achieved by conventional therapy and training programs assisted by an interlimb-coordinated (IC) robot.

    Methods

    Fifty-four participants with subacute stroke were randomized into three groups: ENMS, IC, or conventional therapy. All groups underwent 21 rehabilitation sessions (60 min/day for 21 consecutive days), each including 30 min of standardized Bobath therapy. During the additional 30 min of training, the ENMS group engaged in semi-independent bedside training with minimal supervision, the IC group received supervised IC cycling, and the conventional group received proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. The rehabilitative effects were evaluated via clinical scores. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), and the secondary outcomes included the action research arm test (ARAT), modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and modified Barthel index (MBI). The manpower consumption was quantified on the basis of the professional hours required during training.

    Results

    The ENMS group required significantly less total occupational therapist (OT) involvement (11.6 h) compared with the IC (22.9 h) and conventional (21.0 h) groups, representing a 49.4% reduction in professional manpower demand. All groups showed significant improvements in FMA-UE, ARAT, and MBI scores. Compared with the other groups, the ENMS group achieved superior gains in voluntary motor function (FMA-UE and ARAT, P < 0.05). The ENMS group also obtained significant reductions in muscle spasticity across multiple joints (MAS, P < 0.05). The IC group demonstrated the largest MBI improvements, while the conventional group showed greater gains in hand function than the IC group (P < 0.05).

    Conclusions

    Semi-independent bedside rehabilitation with WH-ENMS is feasible, safe, and effective for inpatients with subacute stroke. It reduced the demand for professional manpower while promoting upper limb recovery, particularly wrist–hand function, during the critical subacute neuroplasticity window. This approach could optimize rehabilitation resource allocation and facilitate more personalized interventions.

    Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2300074469. Registered on 2023/08/08.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment