Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, July 17, 2026

Smartphone-based real-time feedback to suppress trunk compensation for unsupervised upper limb rehabilitation in patients with brain disorders

 Since it is likely spasticity causing the problems; this is fucking useless info! CURE SPASTICITY FIRST!

Your doctor needs to solve this first: Stroke Trunk Control Linked to Muscle Stiffness May 2026 

The latest here:

Smartphone-based real-time feedback to suppress trunk compensation for unsupervised upper limb rehabilitation in patients with brain disorders

    We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

    Abstract

    Background

    To ensure continuous rehabilitation for patients with hemiparesis due to brain disorders, there is a growing need for simple, accessible systems that enable unsupervised self-training. The occurrence of compensatory trunk movements during the unsupervised exercise may prevent true functional recovery. This study proposes a smartphone-based visual-auditory feedback system designed to detect and suppress compensatory trunk movements in real-time without wearable sensors.

    Methods

    A pilot cohort (n = 16) was first used to calibrate detection thresholds for compensatory trunk movements. Subsequently, a total of 55 hemiparetic patients were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial and allocated to a Feedback (FB) group (n = 27) or a Non-Feedback (NFB) group (n = 28). Participants performed standardised upper limb rehabilitation tasks using the Rapael Smart Board™, a planar upper limb rehabilitation device. The proposed system utilised a smartphone camera with MediaPipe-based pose estimation to track trunk movements and provided real-time traffic-light feedback based on calibrated thresholds. Outcome measures included trunk path length, trunk deviation, task efficiency, and spatial occupancy, which were evaluated using 3D coordinates reconstructed from depth camera data.

    Results

    The FB group demonstrated significantly improved postural stability compared to the NFB group, with a 37.9% reduction in trunk path length (p = 0.014) and a 35.3% decrease in spatial occupancy (p = 0.003). Kinematic analysis revealed that the NFB group's shorter hand path lengths were achieved through kinematic redundancy—specifically, the recruitment of trunk degrees of freedom—rather than through selective upper limb motor control. In contrast, the FB group maintained a stable posture near the neutral position, ensuring true upper limb engagement. The usability assessment demonstrated that the system was well received by users and was reliable (Cronbach's = 0.775).

    Conclusion

    The proposed system, which integrates mobile technology, effectively suppresses compensatory trunk movements and promotes selective motor control, and ensures that rehabilitation outcomes reflect true upper limb joint engagement rather than kinematic redundancy through compensatory trunk recruitment. While certain design considerations remain, particularly related to dynamic recalibration and the use of a fixed auditory feedback window, the system retains strong potential as an automated feedback solution, offering a scalable and accessible pathway for high-quality unsupervised home rehabilitation.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment