Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery May Serve As a Tissue Clock in Patients Treated With Endovascular Thrombectomy

 And somehow you think predicting failure to recover is important.  It is vastly more important to have exact recovery protocols. GET THERE!

Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery May Serve As a Tissue Clock in Patients Treated With Endovascular Thrombectomy

Junya Aoki

,

Yuki Sakamoto

,

Kentaro Suzuki

,

Yuji Nishi

,

Akihito Kutsuna

,

Yukako Takei

,

Kazutaka Sawada

,

Takuya Kanamaru

,

Arata Abe

,

Takehiro Katano

,

Yuho Takeshi

,

Toru Nakagami

, … See all authors

Originally published7 May 2021https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033374Stroke. 2021;52:2232–2240

• is related to

Abstract

• Download figure
• Download PowerPoint

Background and Purpose:

We investigated whether the signal change on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) can serve as a tissue clock that predicts the clinical outcome after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), independently of the onset-to-admission time.

Methods:

Consecutive patients with acute stroke treated with EVT between September 2014 and December 2018 were enrolled. Based on the parenchymal signal change on FLAIR, patients were classified into FLAIR-negative and FLAIR-positive groups. The clinical characteristics, imaging findings, EVT parameters, and the intracranial hemorrhage defined as Heidelberg Bleeding Classification ≥1c hemorrhage (parenchymal hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and/or subdural hemorrhage) were compared between the 2 groups. A modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 at 3 months was considered to represent a good outcome.

Results:

Of the 227 patients with EVT during the study period, 140 patients (62%) were classified into the FLAIR-negative group and 87 (38%) were classified into the FLAIR-positive group. In the FLAIR-negative group, the patients were older (P=0.011), the onset-to-image time was shorter (P<0.001), the frequency of cardioembolic stroke was higher (P=0.006), and the rate of intravenous thrombolysis was higher (P<0.001) in comparison to the FLAIR-positive group. Although the rate of complete recanalization after EVT did not differ between the 2 groups (P=0.173), the frequency of both any-intracranial hemorrhage and Heidelberg Bleeding Classification ≥1c hemorrhage were higher in the FLAIR-positive group (P=0.004 and 0.011). At 3 months, the percentage of patients with a good outcome (FLAIR-negative, 41%; FLAIR-positive, 27%) was significantly related to the FLAIR signal change (P=0.047), while the onset-to-image time was not significant (P=0.271). A multivariate regression analysis showed that a FLAIR-negative status was independently associated with a good outcome (odds ratio, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.02–4.31], P=0.044).

Conclusions:

A FLAIR-negative status may predict the clinical outcome more accurately than the onset-to-admission time, which may support the role of FLAIR as a tissue clock.