Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, July 26, 2021

Oropharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 test causing atypical internal carotid artery dissection and stroke in a patient after mild COVID-19

 Are you that blind that you missed the real reason for the dissection? Hyperextended neck is the reason.

What Is Beauty Parlor Stroke Syndrome? | SELF

The latest here:

Oropharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 test causing atypical internal carotid artery dissection and stroke in a patient after mild COVID-19

First Published July 23, 2021 Case Report 

We report a patient who had recovered from pneumonia caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) presenting with acute cerebral ischemia due to atypical dissection of the left internal carotid artery immediately after an oropharyngeal swab (OPS) for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing. The symptoms consisting of right-side hemiparesis and aphasia improved after systemic thrombolysis and the patient recovered completely in the further course. We demonstrate findings from imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, neurovascular ultrasound) among other investigations and discuss coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related vessel wall vulnerability as well as tissue injury posed by the swab procedure as underlying causes of the dissection. Individuals performing OPSs during the corona pandemic should be aware of this so far undescribed complication.

A 52-year-old man who had fully recovered from mild pneumonia due to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in home quarantine 5 days earlier presented to our emergency room with acute severe left middle cerebral artery (MCA) syndrome on 5 May 2020. Just before onset of symptoms, an oropharyngeal swab (OPS) had been collected by a paramedic in a seated position. During the procedure, the patient’s head was hyperextended and he experienced acute neck pain; 30 min later, he was found agitated and unable to communicate by his relatives. Upon presentation to our emergency room 50 min after symptom onset, the patient suffered from high-grade sensorimotor right-side hemiparesis and global aphasia, with an initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)-Score of 17. Immediate computed tomography (CT)-examination of the brain showed no early stroke signs but CT-perfusion revealed large areas of hypoperfusion in left precentral and central areas. Large vessel occlusion was absent in CT-angiography, but irregularities in the left carotid bulb with suspected short-segment stenosis due to atypical dissection were found (Figure 1a). Systemic thrombolysis was administered with 70 mg rtPA at a door-to-needle time of 10 min, 60 min after symptom onset. Symptoms improved quickly subsequently, with mild paraesthesia of the right arm and mild aphasia remaining. Ultrasound examination confirmed a short vessel wall hematoma in the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) (Figure 1b–d) without signs of arteriosclerosis. The diagnosis of ICA dissection was supported by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and neck with a focal proximal ICA dissection and cerebral infarctions in the left MCA territory (Figure 2). Further diagnostic workup revealed continuous sinus rhythm, unremarkable transoesophageal echocardiography, exclusion of hereditary thrombophilia and normal cerebrospinal fluid findings with negative viral search panel including negative SARS-CoV-2-RT-PCR. There were no signs or symptoms of hereditary tissue disease or migraine; cerebrovascular risk factors (such as smoking, obesity, hypertension) were absent and family history was unremarkable for dissection or stroke. Medical treatment included platelet inhibition with 100 mg/day acetylsalicylic acid and 40 mg/day atorvastatin as lipid lowering therapy. During rehabilitation, symptoms further improved and the patient recovered without sequelae, allowing him to go back to work after 3 months. Follow-up examination in our outpatient clinic including ultrasound and MRI 3 months later confirmed full neurological recovery, albeit with incomplete remission of ICA vessel wall injury (Figure 2d, f).

figure

Figure 1. (a–d) CT angiography and neurovascular ultrasound at admission. Red arrows: intraarterial mass inside the left proximal ICA, suspicious for hematoma of the vessel wall; blue arrows: residual lumen of the left ICA. (a) CT angiography with short segment stenosis and residual eccentric lumen in the left carotid bulb. (b) Flow signal in close proximity to the wall hematoma. (c) Axial cross-section (B-mode). (d) Sagittal longitudinal section (B-mode). Dotted yellow line: measurement of 6.8 mm.

CT, computed tomography; ICA, internal carotid artery.

figure

Figure 2. (a–e) Confirmation of left ICA dissection in MRI and follow-up images after 12 weeks. MRI with T1-weighted, fat-saturated images (a–b) and time-of-flight angiography (c–d) showing suspicious ICA dissection in week 0 (a, c) and improvement at follow up in week 12 (b, d). (e) Diffusion-weighted imaging at week 0 shows a diffusion restricted pattern in the territory of the left medial cerebral artery matching haemodynamic infarction. (f) Follow-up neurovascular ultrasound at 12 weeks shows receding vessel wall hematoma (dotted green line: 4.5 mm).

ICA, internal carotid artery; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

COVID-19 as a predisposing condition for arterial dissections

Ischemic stroke has been described as major cardiovascular complication in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).1 Mechanistically, this has been attributed mostly to a higher risk of thrombotic events due to a hypercoagulable state driven by systemic inflammation during the course of COVID-19.1 Additionally, direct coronavirus-induced endotheliitis has been observed in some patients.2 It seems plausible that this thrombo-inflammation increases vessel wall vulnerability, which may ultimately lead to dissection even upon mild tissue trauma.3 In fact, published cases of unusual presentations of arterial dissections in COVID-19 patients include spontaneous bilateral carotid artery dissection and spontaneous coronary artery dissection.4,5 Arterial dissections are not specific for SARS-CoV-2, as also other respiratory infections have been shown to present a risk factor for cervical artery dissections (CAD) in the past.6,7 This risk was shown to be independent from mechanical strain through cough or sneeze, hinting at associated vessel pathology. Interestingly, in our case, vessel wall vulnerability seemed to outlast the acute infection phase as the dissection occurred 5 days after clinical recovery from COVID-19.

Role of tissue trauma following OPS

In the present case, the timing of stroke symptoms is highly suggestive for a causal link between the sampling of the OPS and the occurrence of ICA dissection. It is well established that CAD can appear after only minor trauma or even spontaneously.8,9 Hyperextension of the neck can be considered as such a minor trauma and has been described to be associated with CAD in the past, as it probably leads to compression of the ICA against the transverse processes of cervical vertebrae.9 Pressure exerted on the posterolateral wall of the oropharynx by the swab could also have added slight force onto the vessel in this case. The patient had been instructed to recline his head to a maximum position, which he described retrospectively as uncomfortable, and he reported that the swab felt locally painful. Remarkably, the site of dissection at the proximal ICA close to the carotid bulb, about 7 cm from the skull base, is untypical, since most ICA dissections occur adjacent to the skull base or 2–3 cm proximal to it.10,11

Since the beginning of the pandemic, the wide application of OPSs or nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2-RNA have been indispensable for diagnosis and incidence monitoring.12 Although this procedure can be generally regarded as safe, the present case report underlines the potential risk of rare but severe complications, e.g. dissection of head and neck arteries. Therefore, the manipulation should be performed only by trained personnel and with high caution, particularly in individuals with predisposing risk factors such as existing or currently remitted COVID-19 or a history of arterial dissection. Moreover, swabs testing against SARS-CoV-2 should be restricted to situations reasonable from an infectiological perspective.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment