Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Sunday, June 21, 2026

Association of Successful Recanalization and Functional Outcomes in Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of TEMPO-2 Trial

 Success is 100% recovery, you didn't describe that, SO THIS WAS ALL A FUCKING FAILURE!

Association of Successful Recanalization and Functional Outcomes in Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of TEMPO-2 Trial


Abstract

 Complete recanalization of cerebral arteries is strongly associated with good functional outcome in ischemic stroke. We hypothesize that successful recanalization results in better functional outcomes.

METHODS:

This is a secondary observational cohort analysis of TEMPO-2 (Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion), a randomized controlled trial comparing tenecteplase with standard of care (control) in minor stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5) with intracranial occlusion/focal perfusion abnormality ≤12 hours of onset. Among those enrolled based on computed tomography angiography with visible occlusion, a follow-up computed tomography angiography was done at 4 to 8 hours after randomization. The primary outcome was return to baseline functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Safety outcomes included stroke progression (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥2 worsening), bleeding events, and mortality. Patients with successful recanalization, defined as revised Arterial Occlusive Lesion score ≥2b/3, were compared with those with unsuccessful recanalization on follow-up computed tomography angiography. Regression analysis was used to assess the association of successful recanalization with outcomes after adjusting for age, sex, baseline stroke severity, and onset-to-randomization time.Of the 886 enrolled patients, 517 (58.3%) with follow-up computed tomography angiography were included. Of these, 178 (34.6%) had successful recanalization (122 [68.5%]: tenecteplase, 56 (31.5%): control), and 336 (65.4%) did not achieve successful recanalization (unsuccessful recanalization; 134: tenecteplase, 202: control). Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without successful recanalization. Successful recanalization was significantly associated with the primary outcome as compared with unsuccessful recanalization (adjusted risk ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.07–1.34]). Patients with successful recanalization had significantly lower rates of stroke progression as compared with unsuccessful recanalization (2.8% versus 13.1%, adjusted risk ratio, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.08–0.52]). Multivariable analysis showed that tenecteplase treatment was the strongest independent predictor of successful recanalization (odds ratio, 3.48 [95% CI, 2.33–5.18]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Successful recanalization is a critical determinant of early and 90-day functional recovery in patients with minor stroke with intracranial occlusion, regardless of treatment modality. Tenecteplase significantly increases the odds of achieving successful recanalization compared with standard care.

REGISTRATION:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02398656.

Graphical Abstract



Get full access to this article

No comments:

Post a Comment