Which of these 177 hyperacute therapies that need more research did they study?
Did anything here advance knowledge in helping survivors recover?
I bet nothing useful comes from this, your doctor can email them asking what they did to advance the stroke strategy.
http://circres.ahajournals.org/content/118/9/1425.abstract?etoc
+ Author Affiliations
- Correspondence to Michael D. Hill, MD, MSc, Calgary Stroke Program, Department Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Health Sciences Centre, 3300 Hospital Dr NW Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada. E-mail michael.hill@ucalgary.ca
-
↵* Drs Zerna and Hegedus jointly wrote and are considered co-first authors of this article.
-
↵† Dr Hill provided oversight and senior authorship.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to
review advances in stroke treatment in the hyperacute period. With
recent evolutions of
technology in the fields of imaging,
thrombectomy devices, and emergency room workflow management, as well as
improvement
in statistical methods and study design, there
have been ground breaking changes in the treatment of acute ischemic
stroke.
We describe how stroke presents as a clinical
syndrome and how imaging as the most important biomarker will help
differentiate
between stroke subtypes and treatment
eligibility. The evolution of hyperacute treatment has led to the
current standard of
care: intravenous thrombolysis with tissue-type
plasminogen activator and endovascular treatment for proximal vessel
occlusion
in the anterior cerebral circulation. All
patients with acute ischemic stroke are in need of hyperacute secondary
prevention
because the risk of recurrence is highest
closest to the index event. The dominant themes of modern stroke care
are the use
of neurovascular imaging and speed of diagnosis
and treatment.
No comments:
Post a Comment