Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, October 18, 2025

Effects of PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab on preventing early neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke patients with or without large artery atherosclerosis: a subgroup analysis of a randomized trial

Your competent? doctor WORKED UP AN EXACT PROTOCOL TO PREVENT EARLY NEUROLOGICAL DETERIORATION A LONG TIME AGO, RIGHT? NO? So, your doctor, hospital and board of directors are completely fucking incompetent? Thus, making damn sure you'll never get to 100% recovery!

Do you prefer your doctor, hospital and board of director's incompetence NOT KNOWING? OR NOT DOING?

Send me personal hate mail on this: oc1dean@gmail.com. I'll print your complete statement with your name(If you can't stand by your name don't bother replying anonymously) and my response in my blog. Or are you afraid to engage with my stroke-addled mind? No excuses are allowed! You're medically trained; it should be simple to precisely state EXACTLY WHY you aren't working on 100% recovery protocols with NO EXCUSES!



  • Early neurological deterioration (26 posts to January 2017)
  • pcsk9 (10 posts to November 2012)

  • Effects of PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab on preventing early neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke patients with or without large artery atherosclerosis: a subgroup analysis of a randomized trial


    Abstract

    Background

    Our previous study has demonstrated the preventive effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor on early neurological deterioration (END) in patients with acute non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke. Here, we performed a post hoc subgroup analysis to investigate whether the large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) subtype contributed to the clinical outcomes.

    Methods

    According to the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification, patients were divided into LAA and small vessel occlusion (SVO) subgroups. In each subgroup, patients were further subdivided into combination therapy of evolocumab and atorvastatin (PI group) and atorvastatin monotherapy (AT group). The primary outcome was END within 7 days, defined as a ≥ 2-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score increase or NIHSS motor score ≥ 1-point compared with baseline.

    Results

    A total of 272 patients were included: 186 were categorized into the LAA subtype (93 in the PI group and 93 in the AT group) and 86 into the SVO subtype (43 in the PI group and 43 in the AT group). Compared with AT group, the primary analyses showed a significantly lower incidence of END with PI group in the LAA subtype (14.0% versus 28.0%; RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.80; p = 0.006), but not in the SVO subtype (11.6% versus 16.3%; RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.26 to 2.33; p = 0.649). Similar results were observed in terms of favorable functional Outcome at 90 days, combination therapy of evolocumab and atorvastatin was significantly associated with a high proportion of modified Rankin Scale scores of 0–2 at 90 days in the LAA group (81.7% versus 61.3%; RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.65; p < 0.001), but not in the SVO subtype (86.0% versus 74.4%; RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.42; p = 0.157). Other outcomes were similar between the two treatment groups in patients with LAA or SVO subtypes.

    Conclusions

    Among patients with LAA subtype stroke, combination therapy of evolocumab and atorvastatin may be superior to atorvastatin monotherapy regarding preventing END.

    Trial registration

    http://www.chictr.org.cn. Identifier: ChicTR2200059445. Date of registration: 29 April 2022.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment