Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, January 16, 2026

Stroke Experts Challenge "90-Day Recovery" Myth: New Research Shows Patients Need Long-Term Care

All this is why everything in stroke is a COMPLETE FUCKING FAILURE! No one in the world is working on 100% recovery!

'Care' is NOT RECOVERY!

Stroke Experts Challenge "90-Day Recovery" Myth: New Research Shows Patients Need Long-Term Care

Centre for Neuro Skills
Centre for Neuro Skills

Study published by Centre for Neuro Skills researchers in Brain Injury journal argues current insurance policies leave stroke survivors with preventable disabilities and cost society billions

BAKERSFIELD, Calif., Jan. 13, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Stroke survivors need ongoing care far beyond the traditional 90-day recovery window, according to a recently published peer-reviewed article written by the Centre for Neuro Skills (CNS) research team. The article presents evidence that challenges current healthcare practices, limiting stroke treatment to the first 60-90 days post-injury. It indicates that a stroke should be treated as a chronic condition rather than a one-time medical event.

Brent-Mark-Grace-Stephanie-FIN_121925
Brent-Mark-Grace-Stephanie-FIN_121925


From left: Brent E. Masel, Mark J. Ashley, Stefanie N. Howell and Grace S. Griesbach

The review article published in the journal Brain Injury, "Stroke as a chronic health condition: a case for continued care(NOT RECOVERY!)," is authored by CNS researchers Brent E. Masel, Mark J. Ashley, Stefanie N. Howell and Grace S. Griesbach. It presents compelling evidence that stroke survivors can continue to improve with therapy well beyond the traditional 3-6 month "plateau" assumption that drives current insurance reimbursement policies.

"Stroke is disease causative and disease accelerative," the researchers write. "Despite the fact that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has classified stroke as a chronic condition, the focus of care(NOT RECOVERY!) remains on the first 60-90 days after the stroke. There is very little scientific evidence supporting the limits imposed on stroke rehabilitation."

The Cost of Inadequate Long-Term Care

In the US, the average lifetime cost of stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!) per patient is estimated at $140,048.

"Although more intense comprehensive long-term stroke rehabilitation would add to the healthcare financial burden, it would potentially reduce disability and long-term costs to society," the authors state. Among young stroke survivors aged 18-50, nearly 47% were unemployed five years post-stroke, with a 2-3 times greater unemployment rate than their non-injured peers after eight years.

Medical Complications Extend Far Beyond Acute Period

The CNS research highlights that medical complications occur in 67% of stroke survivors, with two-thirds experiencing at least one complication and 25% suffering two or more. The most common complications include depression, pain, falls, cognitive impairment and sleep disorders - many of which develop or persist well beyond the initial months.

Key findings include:

  • More than 50% of stroke survivors report cognitive impairment beyond the first year

  • About one in four stroke survivors (25-28%) develop depression(You prevent depression by having EXACT 100% RECOVERY PROTOCOLS!)

  • More than 70% develop obstructive sleep apnea, yet only 6% receive formal sleep testing

  • 36-51% experience post-stroke fatigue(What is the EXACT CURE FOR THAT?)

  • 30% develop dementia

  • Stroke survivors face a 30% risk of a second stroke within five years—nine times the risk of the general population




New blood test shows extent of brain injury after stroke—and reveals treatment effects

 How long before your incompetent? doctor, hospital and board of directors gets this installed? I'm guessing never!

 I bet your stroke hospital doesn't have a research analyst following AND implementing stroke research! Proof of COMPLETE INCOMPETENCY!

Do you prefer your doctor, hospital and board of director's incompetence NOT KNOWING? OR NOT DOING? Your choice; let them be incompetent or demand action!

New blood test shows extent of brain injury after stroke—and reveals treatment effects

Strokes are a medical emergency, yet imaging can capture only snapshots of how brain damage develops in the hours and days that follow. For many other organs, blood tests can indicate acute injury, but until now the brain has lacked a comparable marker. Researchers at LMU University Hospital and international partners report that a new blood biomarker, brain-derived tau (BD-tau), can track the extent of brain injury after ischemic stroke over time.

BD-tau can also predict patients' functional outcome months to years later and detect differences associated with successful vessel reopening as well as the effect of a drug tested in a clinical trial. The biomarker could also have applications for other neurological conditions.

Co-first authored by Dr. Naomi Vlegels and Nicoló Luca Knuth, the paper has been published in the journal Science Translational Medicine.

In ischemic stroke, part of the brain is no longer adequately supplied with blood. Clinical decisions for people who suddenly develop paralyses or speech problems are currently based largely on CT or MRI scans.

However, in the acute phase, imaging typically provides only point-in-time information. Repeated scans are logistically demanding, not always feasible, and imaging measures often reflect later recovery only to a limited extent. While acute injury to the heart or kidneys can often be monitored with blood tests, the brain has so far lacked such a marker.

"In stroke care, we currently face the problem that we cannot continuously track how brain injury evolves over time—and this limits our treatment decisions," says PD Dr. Dr. Steffen Tiedt, scientist at the Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD) and attending physician in the Stroke Unit at LMU University Hospital's Department of Neurology.

To address this need, he initiated a study at LMU University Hospital in 2013 aimed at developing a reliable blood test that can continuously reflect brain injury and make treatment effects measurable. His team identified brain-derived tau (BD-tau) as a blood biomarker that captures tau protein originating from the central nervous system—enabling exactly that.

In the study cohort established at LMU University Hospital, BD-tau was measured repeatedly from hospital admission through day seven. The findings were additionally validated in two independent multicenter cohorts, including a biomarker-based analysis within a Phase III clinical trial. In total, data from more than 1,200 stroke patients were included in the analyses.

Promising marker for tracking brain injury over time

Blood levels of BD-tau reflected the extent of brain injury: Early levels measured within hours after symptom onset were associated with the initial degree of damage and predicted final infarct size.

BD-tau also captured disease dynamics—larger increases during the first 24 to 48 hours were linked to infarct growth, and elevated levels were observed in complications such as recurrent events. Moreover, BD-tau was a strong predictor of recovery, forecasting functional outcome at 90 days and beyond at least as well as, or better than, other blood biomarkers and even imaging-based infarct volumes.

Finally, BD-tau revealed treatment effects: after a thrombectomy, BD-tau rose less when the vessel was fully reopened, and in a randomized study, the rise in BD-tau was markedly smaller with the neuroprotectant nerinetide than with placebo.

"We don't just need a picture from the beginning of a stroke—we need a way to follow the course of brain injury over time. BD-tau could become a kind of 'troponin for the brain'—an objective blood marker that makes progression and treatment effects measurable," says Tiedt.

The researcher emphasizes that further studies are needed—for example, to define reference ranges and thresholds and to enable faster measurement of BD-tau in the future (ideally as a point-of-care test).

In the long term, such a blood test could help clinicians monitor disease trajectories more closely, detect complications earlier, and evaluate new therapies more efficiently in clinical trials. In addition, BD-tau could help objectively and rapidly assess brain injury in other neurological diseases.

Publication details

Naomi Vlegels et al, Brain-derived tau for monitoring brain injury in acute ischemic stroke, Science Translational Medicine (2026). DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adz1280

Journal information: Science Translational Medicine 

Q&A: In-ear portable EEG system eases access for neurology diagnoses

 Ask your competent? doctor if anything here will provide AN EXACT 3D DAMAGE DIAGNOSIS! Such diagnosis is needed if we are ever to map damage to recovery protocols.

Q&A: In-ear portable EEG system eases access for neurology diagnoses

               ByRobert Herpen, MA
Fact checked byShenaz Bagha

Key takeaways:

  • The portable in-ear EEG aims to integrate real-time brain activity data into daily life.
  • Medical consultation is required once appropriate data is collected.

The need to rapidly, accurately and faithfully transmit brain wave activity via electroencephalogram when a specialist cannot be seen in a timely manner is a significant unmet need in clinical neurology.

One solution is a noninvasive, portable and wearable in-ear electroencephalogram (EEG) device for patients aged 6 years and older that allows for transmission of such data remotely and in real time.Healio spoke with Marc Vaillaud, MD, clinical innovations director at Paris-based Naox Technologies, to find out more about the potential of this new platform to enable faster consultations with doctors while working toward smoother diagnoses of neurology-based conditions.

Healio: What was the impetus behind creating an EEG that is both portable and adjustable?

Vaillaud: Naox was launched with a dual objective: to democratize access to EEG everywhere, including medically underserved areas, and to enable simple, long-term monitoring by integrating EEG into daily life, ultimately making AI available for brain data to prevent neurological disease.

Healio: Are there any other similar devices made by other companies and, if so, what distinguishes Naox’s device?

Vaillaud: The wearable EEG sector is gaining significant momentum, with various companies exploring different form factors such as headbands, around-the-ear, or in-ear devices. Currently, there are approximately four teams worldwide working specifically on in-ear EEG. However, Naox stands out for two primary reasons:

  • Regulatory status: We are the first and only in-ear solution to have received FDA clearance for medical-grade EEG. This is our strongest differentiator, validating our data quality for clinical use.
  • Scalability and fit: While some competitors focus on custom-molded earpieces for each subject, we prioritize scalability. Our device uses standardized earbuds with small, medium and large generic tips, making deployment immediate and logistics much simpler than custom solutions.

Healio: How does the EEG system work?

Vaillaud: Patients, users or any health care professional can place the earbuds of the Naox device in the ears. The sensors, which contain dry electrodes on their tips, are positioned in the ear canals, while the data captured is transmitted wirelessly or saved in the device in a standard EEG format.

Healio: Is there a specific condition the EEG targets, or is it a tool for recognizing any potential neurological issue?

Vaillaud: NAOX in-ear EEG was cleared as a tool to acquire, record and transmit electrical activity of the brain via a single-channel EEG. The medical use of data acquired is to be performed under the direction and interpretation of a licensed medical professional, who decides in which cases it should be used.

Healio: How does the in-ear EEG system’s performance compare to other EEG platforms?

Vaillaud: This was one of the central points of our FDA submission. We demonstrated that the in-ear signal from our device is highly comparable to the signal obtained from the low temporal electrodes derivation of a standard scalp EEG.Therefore, our device delivers performance equivalent to the clinical gold standard for these specific areas.

Healio: Once the data is recorded and transmitted, how does the patient interact with a clinician or specialist to gain a diagnosis?

Vaillaud: A medical consultation is required. The physician will either access the data on a secured platform locally or remotely, for interpretation if he is a certified neurophysiologist, or access the data with a report validated by a certified neurophysiologist.

Healio: Could you describe how patients would receive these devices? For example, would the doctor provide them during an office visit and then the patient would return the device at the next visit?

Vaillaud: Yes, the primary workflow involves the doctor prescribing the device for a specific duration based on clinical need. The patient receives the kit during an office visit and returns it once the monitoring period is complete.Additionally, we envision an “EEG stethoscope” model for hospital settings. In this scenario, doctors would carry their own device to perform immediate, spot-check monitoring on patients at the bedside whenever necessary.

Healio: Would patients need to be trained in its placement and use? Who would provide this training?

Vaillaud: Training is minimal and happens at the point of care. When the doctor hands the device to the patient, they will provide a quick demonstration on how to insert and activate it. We have designed the device with a heavy focus on user experience to ensure it is intuitive. It features only two buttons and clear LED status indicators, eliminating the complexity usually associated with EEG setup.

Healio: Are there any other requirements for proper utilization, like power or software?

Vaillaud: No additional tools or complex equipment are required for utilization. We designed the device to be fully standalone. Regarding power, it utilizes a standard USB-C port, so it can be charged easily just like any standard consumer electronic device.

For more information:

Marc Vaillaud, MD, can be reached on LinkedIn here.

Sukino raises $31 million Series B led by Bessemer to scale out‑of‑hospital care

 

'Care' is NOT RECOVERY!

This is the whole problem in stroke enumerated in one word; 'care'; NOT RECOVERY! 

Our non-existent stroke leadership should be demanding RECOVERY NOT 'CARE'!

My god, anyone in the business world would be fired immediately for managing or caring about something rather than delivering RESULTS. And this is why this is a complete fucking failure! This does nothing to guarantee recovery for survivors!

If your stroke medical 'professional'/hospital is touting 'care' it means they are a failure because they are delivering 'care'; NOT RECOVERY! I would never go to a failed hospital! Anytime I see the word 'care' associated with a stroke hospital; I immediately think fucking failure!

YOU have to get involved and change this failure mindset of 'care' to 100% RECOVERY! Survivors want RECOVERY, NOT 'CARE'!

I see nothing here that states going for 100% recovery! You need to create EXACT PROTOCOLS FOR THAT!

ASK SURVIVORS WHAT THEY WANT, THEY'LL NEVER RESPOND 'CARE'! This tyranny of low expectations has to be completely rooted out of any stroke conversation! I wouldn't go there because of such incompetency as not having 100% recovery protocols!

RECOVERY IS THE ONLY GOAL IN STROKE!

GET THERE!

Sukino raises $31 million Series B led by Bessemer to scale out‑of‑hospital care

Bengaluru-based out‑of‑hospital care(NOT RECOVERY!) chain Sukino has raised $31 million in a Series B round led by Bessemer Venture Partners, with participation from Rainmatter, to expand its post‑acute and rehabilitative care(NOT RECOVERY!) network across India. The company, founded in 2016 by Rajinish and Shalini Menon, currently operates over 850 beds across 11 centres in Bengaluru, Kochi and Coimbatore and is profitable at the group level.

Targeting India’s rising stroke and rehab burden

India accounts for roughly 10% of global stroke cases annually, a share that is rising due to obesity, sedentary lifestyles, hypertension, stress and air pollution. Each stroke patient typically needs 6–8 weeks of multimodal rehabilitation, including physical, speech, occupational and psychological therapy after hospital treatment.

Sukino positions itself as the bridge between this extended care(NOT RECOVERY!)need and the growing willingness of Indian families to seek structured support, offering affordable, protocol-driven post‑acute care(NOT RECOVERY!) so patients can return to fuller, more independent lives.

850+ beds today, aggressive expansion ahead

Sukino’s 11 centres, typically located between major hospitals and residential hubs, primarily serve stroke patients but also admit those needing rehabilitation for neurological, orthopaedic and oncology conditions. The company has recorded 64% year‑on‑year growth in the past year, adding five centres, and now plans to expand to 22 additional centres over the next two years.

“With this milestone, we are one step closer to reimagining how India heals after serious illness, making world‑class rehabilitative care(NOT RECOVERY!) as accessible and accepted as hospital care(NOT RECOVERY!) itself,” said co‑founder and CEO Rajinish Menon. “Our vision is to build an institution where patients and their families can count on structured, compassionate recovery support that restores not just health, but dignity and independence.”

Powered by insurance tailwinds and changing family attitudes

The company’s growth is supported by two key tailwinds: expanding insurance coverage and shifting social norms.

  • More health plans now cover 60–90 days of structured recovery, reducing out‑of‑pocket costs and improving access to quality rehab care(NOT RECOVERY!).
  • Families are increasingly comfortable with institutional recovery, recognising that specialised facilities can deliver better outcomes than home‑based care(NOT RECOVERY!) alone after serious illness.

These trends are helping formal post‑acute care(NOT RECOVERY!) move from a niche option to a mainstream part of the patient journey.

Investors back single‑speciality, post‑discharge care(NOT RECOVERY!)

“We’re thrilled to be partnering with Rajinish, Shalini and team,” said Vishal Gupta, Partner at Bessemer Venture Partners. He also added, “Their focus on protocol‑driven, empathy‑first support ensures high-quality care(NOT RECOVERY!) to patients who are at a tough and vulnerable point in their lives. Our belief in Sukino is rooted in our conviction that high-quality healthcare, especially in the single speciality space, will lead to better clinical care(NOT RECOVERY!) and outcomes for Indian consumers.”

Sharing his thesis on out‑of‑hospital care(NOT RECOVERY!), Rainmatter CEO Nitin Kamath said, “Most patients in India get medical attention for surgeries in hospitals, but there is a far greater need for continued care(NOT RECOVERY!) and support once they are discharged, especially for critical patients. Sukino is solving a real problem here by bridging the gap between hospital discharge and full recovery.” He added that Rainmatter Health is backing Sukino for the “next phase of the journey” as it scales a business that “also drives meaningful outcomes.”​

Injectable nanomaterial reduces secondary brain injury after ischemic stroke

I can almost guarantee your doctor and hospital will KNOW NOTHING AND DO NOTHING! 

No human research will occur; nothing will be done! That is how fucking incompetent the whole stroke medical world is. Hopefully comeuppance will hit them all with a stroke. And they can regret their incompetence in not solving stroke to 100% recovery!

Al this incompetence is a result of NO leadership firing the incompetent persons!

Injectable nanomaterial reduces secondary brain injury after ischemic stroke

When a person suffers a stroke, physicians must restore blood flow to the brain as quickly as possible to save their life. But, ironically, that life-saving rush of blood can also trigger a second wave of damage - killing brain cells, fueling inflammation and increasing the odds of long-term disability.

Now, Northwestern University scientists have developed an injectable regenerative nanomaterial that helps protect the brain during this vulnerable window.

In a new preclinical study, the team delivered a single intravenous dose, immediately after restoring blood flow, in a mouse model of ischemic stroke, the most common type of stroke. The therapy successfully crossed the blood-brain barrier - a major challenge for most drugs - to reach and repair brain tissue. The material significantly reduced brain damage and showed no signs of side effects or organ toxicity.

Published Jan. 7 in the journal Neurotherapeutics, the findings suggest the new therapy could eventually complement existing stroke treatments by limiting secondary brain injury and supporting recovery.

Current clinical approaches are entirely focused on blood flow restoration. Any treatment that facilitates neuronal recovery and minimizes injury would be very powerful, but that holy grail doesn't yet exist. This study is promising because it's leading us down a pathway to develop these technologies and therapeutics for this unmet need."

Dr. Ayush Batra, associate professor, neurology (neurocritical care) and pathology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, co-director of the NeuroVascular Inflammation Laboratory at Northwestern and a neurocritical care physician with Northwestern Medicine

The injectable therapy is based on supramolecular therapeutic peptides (STPs), a platform developed by Northwestern's Samuel I. Stupp. A study published in 2021 in the journal Science demonstrated the use of an STP technology - nicknamed "dancing molecules" - because of the highly dynamic nature of its therapeutic agents that could reverse paralysis and repair tissue in mice after a single injection at the site of severe spinal cord injury. The new study found scientists can administer similar dynamic assemblies of molecules intravenously, without requiring surgery or an invasive injection directly into the brain.

"One of the most promising aspects of this study is that we were able to show this therapeutic technology, which has shown incredible promise in spinal cord injury, can now begin to be applied in a stroke model and that it can be delivered systemically," said Stupp, co-corresponding author and Board of Trustees Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Chemistry, Medicine and Biomedical Engineering at Northwestern. "This systemic delivery mechanism and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier is a significant advance that could also be useful in treating traumatic brain injuries and neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS."

Stupp also is founding director of the Center for Regenerative Nanomedicine. He has appointments in the McCormick School of Engineering, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences and Feinberg School of Medicine.

Study mimicked real-world stroke treatment

Acute ischemic stroke, which accounts for 80% of all strokes in the U.S., is a devastating condition and is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, Batra said. Ischemic strokes occur when a clot blocks blood flow to the brain. Physicians reopen the vessel by administering "clot-busting" drugs or using devices to surgically remove the clot.

Severe strokes can lead to permanent, significant disability that affects a patient's quality of life and their ability to return to work and engage with their family and society.

"It has not only a significant personal and emotional burden on patients, but also a financial burden on families and communities," he said. "Reducing this level of disability with a therapy that could potentially help in restoring function and minimizing injury would really have a powerful long-term impact."

The findings are highly relevant for future clinical applications because the scientists tested the approach in a mouse model that closely mimics real-world ischemic stroke treatment, Batra said. They first blocked blood flow to simulate a major ischemic stroke and then restored it (a process called reperfusion), just as doctors restore blood flow acutely for ischemic stroke patients. 

The scientists monitored the mice for seven days and didn't observe any significant side effects or biocompatibility issues such as toxicity or immune system rejection. They used advanced imaging techniques, such as real-time intravital intracranial microscopy seen in this video, to confirm the therapy localized to the stroke injury site. Compared to untreated mice, those treated with the "dancing molecules" had significantly less brain tissue damage, reduced signs of inflammation and reduced signs of excessive, damaging immune response.

Stupp said the therapy has pro-regenerative and anti-inflammatory properties, both of which contributed to the positive results.

"You get an accumulation of harmful molecules once the blockage occurs and then suddenly you remove the clot and all those 'bad actors' get released into the bloodstream, where they cause additional damage," Stupp said. "But the dancing molecules carry with them some anti-inflammatory activity to counteract these effects and at the same time help repair neural networks." 

Dynamic 'dancing molecules' can be dialed down in concentration

The secret behind Stupp's "dancing molecules" breakthrough therapeutic is tuning the collective motion of molecules, so they can find and properly engage constantly moving cellular receptors. The treatment sends signals that encourage nerve cells to repair themselves. For example, it can help nerve fibers (called axons) grow again and reconnect with other nerve cells, restoring lost communication. This process is called plasticity, which means the brain and spinal cord can adapt and rebuild connections after injury. 

In previous studies, scientists injected the dancing molecules as a liquid, and when used to treat spinal cord injury, the therapy immediately gels into a complex network of nanofibers that mimic the dense, extracellular matrix of the spinal cord. By matching the matrix's structure, mimicking the motion of biological molecules and incorporating signals for receptors, the synthetic materials are able to communicate with cells.

In the new study, the scientists dialed down the concentration of supramolecular peptide assemblies to prevent possible clotting as the therapy enters the bloodstream. Smaller aggregates of peptides easily crossed the blood-brain barrier. Once enough molecules cross, larger nanofiber assemblies can form in brain tissue to produce a more potent therapeutic effect, Stupp said.

"We chose for this stroke study one of the most dynamic therapies we had in terms of its molecular structure so that supramolecular assemblies would have a better probability of crossing the blood-brain barrier," Stupp said. 

Optimizing therapeutic targeting

The fact that seemingly effective therapies cannot cross the blood-brain barrier has plagued the neuroscience field for decades, Batra said. This new therapy could change that.

When a physician acutely restores blood flow to a region of the brain in a stroke patient, the blood-brain barrier permeability is locally increased, naturally creating a transient opening and opportunity for therapeutic intervention, Batra said.

"Add to that a dynamic peptide that is able to cross more readily, and you're really optimizing the chances that your therapy is going where you want it to go," Batra said. 

Next steps

Further studies will need to assess whether this treatment can support longer-term, functional recovery, Batra said. For instance, many stroke patients suffer from significant cognitive decline throughout the subsequent year after a stroke. The new therapy is primed to address that secondary injury, Batra said, but the studies will require a longer follow-up period and more sophisticated behavioral testing. 

In addition, the team is interested in testing whether additional regenerative signals could be incorporated into the therapeutic peptides to produce even better results.

The study is titled, "Toward Development of a Dynamic Supramolecular Peptide Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke." Graduate student Zijun Gao and postdoctoral researcher Luisa Andrade da Silva are co-first authors of the paper. 

Funding for this study was primarily provided by the SQI Synthesizer Grant Program at the Center for Regenerative Nanomedicine.