Impossible to tell since none are objective and have EXACT PROTOCOLS!
Are All “Healthy Diets” Equal for Stroke Prevention?
Eating healthy is supposed to protect the heart — but do all "heart-healthy" dietary patterns protect equally well against stroke? A new analysis from the PREDIMED trial takes on this question and delivers surprisingly clear answers. Castro-Barquero et al. compared four widely promoted dietary patterns — Mediterranean, DASH, MIND, and the Planetary Health Diet — in over 7,000 high-risk individuals over a median follow-up of 4.3 years. The result: Those participants in the highest quintile of cumulative adherence had approximately 75% lower stroke risk than those in the lowest quintile. For DASH and the Planetary Health Diet, only non-significant trends emerged.

The MIND diet combines Mediterranean principles with a focus on brain health — and performs on par with classic Mediterranean eating. One possible explanation is that these dietary patterns share several components, including plant-based foods, olive oil, and nuts. That said, caution is warranted. Because this was a post hoc observational analysis of adherence within a randomized trial, causal inference regarding the dietary scores themselves remains limited. Those with higher dietary adherence were also generally healthier and more physically active; residual confounding cannot be ruled out. Only 135 stroke events were available for analysis, which limits statistical power, particularly for subgroup comparisons. And the cohort consisted of older, high-risk individuals in Spain, which constrains generalizability.
Nevertheless, this study strengthens the case for Mediterranean and MIND dietary patterns in stroke prevention, without the differences between diet scores being over-interpreted. The real message remains simple: Overall dietary quality appears important, but in this cohort, the strongest evidence supported Mediterranean and MIND dietary patterns.
No comments:
Post a Comment