Responsiveness of five measures of arm function in acute stroke rehabilitation

I have no clue how this is going to get your arm 100% recovered.  Ask your doctor, not politely, how this helps your recovery. YOU need to put the onus on your doctor to research, find and deliver efficacious stroke protocols.  Right now YOU have to find them yourself and they are only guidelines. 
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0269215518778316

Angela Vratsistas-Curto, Catherine Sherrington, Annie McCluskey

First Published May 30, 2018 Research Article

Download PDF	Article information

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the responsiveness of five arm function measures in people receiving acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

Design:

Inception cohort study.

Setting:

Comprehensive stroke unit providing early rehabilitation.

Subjects:

A total of 64 consecutively admitted stroke survivors with moderately severe disability (Modified Rankin Scale score median (interquartile range (IQR)): 4.0 (1.0)).

Main measures:

Responsiveness was analyzed by calculating effect size, standardized response mean and median-based effect size. Floor/ceiling effects were calculated as the percentage of participants scoring the lowest/highest possible scores.

Results:

Average length of stay and number of therapy days were 34 (SD = 27.9) and 12 (SD = 13.1), respectively. Box and Block Test and Functional Independence Measure–Self-Care showed the highest responsiveness with values in the moderate–large range (effect size = 1.09, standardized response mean = 1.07 and median-based effect size = 0.76; effect size = 0.94, standardized response mean = 1.04 and median-based effect size = 1.0). Responsiveness of Action Research Arm Test and Upper Limb–Motor Assessment Scale were moderate (effect size = 0.58, standardized response mean = 0.69 and median-based effect size = 0.59; effect size = 0.62, standardized response mean = 0.75 and median-based effect size = 0.67). For Manual Muscle Test, responsiveness was in the small–moderate range (effect size = 0.42, standardized response mean = 0.59 and median-based effect size = 0.5). Box and Block Test showed the largest floor effect on admission (28%), and Action Research Arm Test and Manual Muscle Test showed the largest ceiling effect on discharge (31%).

Conclusion:

These five measures varied in their ability to detect change with responsiveness ranging from the small to large range. Box and Block Test and Functional Independence Measure–Self-Care showed a greater ability to detect change; both demonstrated moderate–large responsiveness.